School of Social and Health Sciences, James Cook University, Singapore 387380, Singapore.
College of Healthcare Sciences, James Cook University, Douglas 4811, Australia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Mar 14;21(3):347. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21030347.
The current study's aim was to better understand people's feelings towards different types of natural and built green space environments in the highly urbanized "garden city" of Singapore. We examined which types of green spaces elicited positive (eudemonic) or negative (apprehensive) affective responses. A total of 288 adult residents of Singapore completed a survey that asked them to report their affective states in response to images of 10 locally different environment types and to complete measures of childhood location, frequency of visiting natural/built environments, nature connectedness, and dispositional anxiety, as well as demographic items on age and gender. The 10 green space environment types were mapped onto an experiential state space representing feelings of apprehension and eudemonia in response to specific types of urban green spaces. In terms of a biophilic response, feelings of eudemonia were no different in natural green spaces compared to built green spaces. A higher frequency of experience in specific environments is associated with enhanced feelings of eudemonia in these environments. The findings indicate that people in Singapore can be apprehensive as much in natural green spaces as in built green spaces, and they can also find eudemonic experiences in built green spaces such as roof-top gardens or town parks.
本研究旨在更好地了解人们在高度城市化的“花园城市”新加坡对不同类型的自然和人造绿色空间环境的感受。我们考察了哪些类型的绿色空间会引起积极(幸福)或消极(忧虑)的情感反应。共有 288 名新加坡成年居民完成了一项调查,要求他们对 10 种本地不同环境类型的图像报告他们的情感状态,并完成关于童年居住地、访问自然/人造环境的频率、与自然的联系、性格焦虑以及年龄和性别等人口统计项目的测量。这 10 种绿色空间环境类型被映射到一个体验状态空间上,该空间代表了对特定类型的城市绿色空间的忧虑和幸福感受。就亲生命反应而言,自然绿色空间和人造绿色空间的幸福感没有区别。在特定环境中更频繁的体验与这些环境中幸福感的增强有关。研究结果表明,新加坡人在自然绿色空间中可能和在人造绿色空间中一样感到忧虑,他们也可以在人造绿色空间中体验到幸福感,例如屋顶花园或城市公园。