Health Affairs Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
School of Public Health, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Zoonoses Public Health. 2024 Sep;71(6):653-662. doi: 10.1111/zph.13128. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
Although tick-borne disease (TBD) incidence has increased in the United States (U.S.) in the past decade, new evidence suggests that notifiable diseases surveillance records may not accurately reflect the true magnitude of TBD diagnoses. Furthermore, while regional electronic health records (EHR) are readily accessible their potential use as a more stable and consistent source of TBD diagnoses data has remained largely unexplored.
In this study, we used EHR from a database of more than 100 hospitals, healthcare networks, and insurance providers in Indiana, U.S., to better understand incidence, spatio-temporal and demographic distribution of TBD Diagnoses from 2009-2018. Our results revealed that in Indiana, from 2009 to 2018, there were 5173 unique TBD Diagnoses across three diagnoses categories: Lyme disease (72.5%, n = 3751), Rickettsioses (12.0%, n = 623) and Other TBD Diagnoses (15.4%, n = 799). Using EHR, the average yearly Lyme disease diagnoses was more than double the cases obtained using notifiable disease surveillance data for the same period. Patients with a TBD Diagnoses were generally older (ages 45-59) and less racially diverse (96.3% white). Rickettsiosis diagnoses were reported more among male patients (55.2%), while Lyme disease diagnoses were higher among female patients (57.1%). Temporal data illustrated higher frequencies of diagnoses from May to July. Hot spot analysis identified a Lyme disease hot spot in northwest Indiana, while hotspots of Rickettsiosis and Other TBD Diagnoses category were identified in southwest Indiana. Extrapolated to the Indiana population, chi-squared (χ) tests of independence revealed that the observed distribution of TBD diagnoses in our data was significantly different from the expected distribution in the Indiana population-based race, gender and age groups.
Our study findings demonstrate that in Indiana, EHR provide a stable data source for elucidating TBD disease burden and for monitoring spatio-temporal trends in TBD diagnoses.
尽管在美国(U.S.)过去十年中,蜱传疾病(TBD)的发病率有所增加,但新的证据表明,法定疾病监测记录可能无法准确反映 TBD 诊断的真实规模。此外,虽然区域电子健康记录(EHR)易于获取,但它们作为更稳定和一致的 TBD 诊断数据来源的潜力在很大程度上仍未得到探索。
在这项研究中,我们使用了美国印第安纳州 100 多家医院、医疗网络和保险公司的数据库中的 EHR,以更好地了解 2009-2018 年 TBD 诊断的发病率、时空和人口统计学分布。我们的研究结果表明,在印第安纳州,从 2009 年到 2018 年,有 5173 例 TBD 诊断的独特病例,分为三个诊断类别:莱姆病(72.5%,n=3751)、立克次体病(12.0%,n=623)和其他 TBD 诊断(15.4%,n=799)。使用 EHR,莱姆病的年平均诊断病例数是同期法定疾病监测数据的两倍多。TBD 诊断患者的年龄通常较大(45-59 岁),种族多样性较低(96.3%为白人)。立克次体病诊断报告更多见于男性患者(55.2%),而莱姆病诊断则多见于女性患者(57.1%)。时间数据显示,从 5 月到 7 月诊断的频率较高。热点分析确定了印第安纳州西北部的莱姆病热点,而西南印第安纳州则确定了立克次体病和其他 TBD 诊断类别的热点。推断到印第安纳州的人口,卡方(χ)检验独立性表明,我们数据中 TBD 诊断的观察分布与基于种族、性别和年龄组的印第安纳州人口的预期分布显著不同。
我们的研究结果表明,在印第安纳州,EHR 为阐明 TBD 疾病负担和监测 TBD 诊断的时空趋势提供了稳定的数据来源。