Gaurav Ankit, Kumar Prasoon, Sudesh Pebam, Prakash Mahesh, Meena Shyam Charan, Patel Sandeep, Kumar Vishal
Department of Orthopaedics, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012 India.
Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012 India.
Indian J Orthop. 2024 Feb 14;58(4):339-344. doi: 10.1007/s43465-024-01104-8. eCollection 2024 Apr.
The choice of entry point, Greater trochanter (GT), or Piriformis entry (PE) for antegrade intramedullary nailing (IMN) of the femur is crucial. This study was performed to compare these two entry points in the patients with shaft of femur fractures regarding intra-operative parameters, radiological and functional outcomes.
Twenty-four patients underwent GT entry nailing, while 25 patients underwent PE nailing. Surgical time, Intra-operative blood units transfused, Intra-operative fluoroscopy exposure by number of C-arm shots taken, mean drop in hemoglobin, and incidence of iatrogenic fracture were recorded. Patients were followed up at 4 weeks, 6 weeks, and 6 months to look for radiological healing and improvements in functional outcome using Modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS). MRI of bilateral hips with pelvis was done in 25 patients at 6 months of follow-up to detect any preliminary signs of AVN.
The mean drop in hemoglobin in the GT group was significantly lesser than the PE group ( = 0.02). Mean MHHS at 4 weeks post-op was also significantly higher in the GT group ( = 0.01). There was no significant difference between both the groups regarding surgical duration, fluoroscopy exposure, radiological and functional outcomes in the long term. None of the patients who underwent MRI displayed any preliminary sign of AVN.
GT entry nails lead to lesser surgical time, fluoroscopy exposure, and intra-operative blood loss. Both the nailing systems achieve excellent fracture unions and comparable functional outcomes in the long term, and there is a minuscule risk of AVN in adult patients undergoing IMN.
对于股骨顺行髓内钉固定术(IMN),选择大转子(GT)或梨状肌入路(PE)作为入点至关重要。本研究旨在比较股骨骨干骨折患者的这两种入点在术中参数、影像学及功能结果方面的差异。
24例患者接受GT入路髓内钉固定,25例患者接受PE入路髓内钉固定。记录手术时间、术中输血量、术中C形臂透视次数、血红蛋白平均下降值及医源性骨折发生率。在4周、6周和6个月时对患者进行随访,使用改良Harris髋关节评分(MHHS)评估影像学愈合及功能结果改善情况。在随访6个月时,对25例患者进行双侧髋关节及骨盆的MRI检查,以检测有无早期股骨头缺血性坏死(AVN)迹象。
GT组血红蛋白平均下降值显著低于PE组(=0.02)。术后4周时,GT组的平均MHHS也显著更高(=0.01)。两组在手术时长、透视暴露次数、长期影像学及功能结果方面无显著差异。接受MRI检查的患者均未显示出任何早期AVN迹象。
GT入路髓内钉可缩短手术时间、减少透视暴露及术中失血量。两种髓内钉固定系统长期均能实现良好的骨折愈合及相当的功能结果,且接受IMN的成年患者发生AVN的风险极小。