• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共病模式对冠心病患者结局和治疗的影响。

Impact of multimorbidity patterns on outcomes and treatment in patients with coronary artery disease.

作者信息

Zheng Wen, Huang Xin, Wang Xiao, Suo Min, Yan Yan, Gong Wei, Ai Hui, Que Bin, Nie Shaoping

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 2 Anzhen Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100029, China.

Department of Cardiology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.10 Tieyi Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100000, China.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Open. 2024 Mar 27;4(2):oeae009. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeae009. eCollection 2024 Mar.

DOI:10.1093/ehjopen/oeae009
PMID:38544919
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10970685/
Abstract

AIMS

With an aging population and better survival rates, coronary artery disease (CAD) with multimorbidity has become more prevalent, complicating treatment and impacting life quality and longevity. This study identifies multimorbidity patterns in CAD patients and their effect on clinical outcomes, emphasizing treatment strategies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study analysed data from the DCEM registry (173 459 patients) and BleeMACS cohort (15 401 patients) to categorize CAD patients into three multimorbidity patterns. The focus was on how these patterns influence outcomes, especially concerning the efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). The study identified three distinct multimorbidity patterns: Class 1 encompassed cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic comorbidities indicating the highest risk; Class 2 included hypertension-dyslipidaemia comorbidities, reflecting intermediate risk; and Class 3 involved non-specific comorbidities, indicating the lowest risk. Class 1 patients demonstrated a six-fold increase in in-hospital mortality and a four-fold increase in severe in-hospital complications compared with Class 3. Over a 1-year period, Class 1 was associated with the highest risk, displaying a significant increase in all-cause mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.52-2.31, < 0.001] and a notable risk for major bleeding (adjusted HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.36-2.24, < 0.001) compared with Class 3. The use of DAPT, particularly aspirin combined with clopidogrel, significantly reduced the 1-year all-cause mortality in Class 1 patients (adjusted HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.37-0.98, = 0.04) without increasing in major bleeding.

CONCLUSION

Coronary artery disease patients with a cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic profile face the highest mortality risk. Targeted DAPT, especially aspirin and clopidogrel, effectively lowers mortality without significantly raising bleeding risks.

REGISTRATION

DCEM registry (NCT05797402) and BleeMACS registry (NCT02466854).

摘要

目的

随着人口老龄化和生存率提高,合并多种疾病的冠状动脉疾病(CAD)愈发普遍,使治疗复杂化并影响生活质量和寿命。本研究确定CAD患者的多种疾病模式及其对临床结局的影响,强调治疗策略。

方法与结果

该研究分析了DCEM注册研究(173459例患者)和BleeMACS队列研究(15401例患者)的数据,将CAD患者分为三种多种疾病模式。重点在于这些模式如何影响结局,特别是关于双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)的疗效和安全性。研究确定了三种不同的多种疾病模式:1类包括心血管-肾脏-代谢共病,表明风险最高;2类包括高血压-血脂异常共病,反映中度风险;3类涉及非特异性共病,表明风险最低。与3类相比,1类患者住院死亡率增加了6倍,严重住院并发症增加了4倍。在1年期间,1类与最高风险相关,与3类相比,全因死亡率显著增加[调整后风险比(HR)1.87,95%置信区间(CI)1.52-2.31,<0.001],且大出血风险显著(调整后HR 1.74,95%CI 1.36-2.24,<0.001)。使用DAPT,尤其是阿司匹林联合氯吡格雷,显著降低了1类患者的1年全因死亡率(调整后HR 0.60,95%CI 0.37-0.98,=0.04),且未增加大出血风险。

结论

具有心血管-肾脏-代谢特征的冠状动脉疾病患者面临最高的死亡风险。针对性的DAPT,尤其是阿司匹林和氯吡格雷,可有效降低死亡率,而不会显著增加出血风险。

注册情况

DCEM注册研究(NCT05797402)和BleeMACS注册研究(NCT02466854)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc88/10970685/61cc843bd55d/oeae009f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc88/10970685/a551a6d32889/oeae009_ga.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc88/10970685/7557e92f30aa/oeae009f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc88/10970685/61cc843bd55d/oeae009f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc88/10970685/a551a6d32889/oeae009_ga.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc88/10970685/7557e92f30aa/oeae009f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc88/10970685/61cc843bd55d/oeae009f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of multimorbidity patterns on outcomes and treatment in patients with coronary artery disease.共病模式对冠心病患者结局和治疗的影响。
Eur Heart J Open. 2024 Mar 27;4(2):oeae009. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeae009. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Versus Aspirin Monotherapy in Diabetics With Multivessel Disease Undergoing CABG: FREEDOM Insights.多血管病变行 CABG 的糖尿病患者中双联抗血小板治疗与阿司匹林单药治疗的比较:FREEDOM 研究结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jan 17;69(2):119-127. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.043.
3
Benefits and Risks of Prolonged Duration Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (Clopidogrel and Aspirin) After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in High-Risk Patients With Diabetes Mellitus.高危糖尿病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后延长双联抗血小板治疗(氯吡格雷和阿司匹林)的获益与风险。
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Mar 1;142:14-24. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.11.043. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
4
Three, six, or twelve months of dual antiplatelet therapy after DES implantation in patients with or without acute coronary syndromes: an individual patient data pairwise and network meta-analysis of six randomized trials and 11 473 patients.药物洗脱支架植入术后,无论患者有无急性冠脉综合征,给予3个月、6个月或12个月双联抗血小板治疗:六项随机试验和11473例患者的个体患者数据成对和网状荟萃分析
Eur Heart J. 2017 Apr 7;38(14):1034-1043. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw627.
5
Multimorbidity in patients with heart failure from 11 Asian regions: A prospective cohort study using the ASIAN-HF registry.11 个亚洲地区心力衰竭患者的多病共存情况:使用 ASIAN-HF 注册研究的前瞻性队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Mar 27;15(3):e1002541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002541. eCollection 2018 Mar.
6
Effects of dual antiplatelet therapy on graft patency after lower extremity bypass.下肢旁路术后双联抗血小板治疗对移植物通畅率的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Mar;73(3):930-939. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.06.127. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
7
Adverse clinical outcomes associated with double dose clopidogrel compared to the other antiplatelet regimens in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.与其他抗血小板治疗方案相比,双倍剂量氯吡格雷治疗冠状动脉疾病患者的不良临床结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2018 Sep 3;19(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s40360-018-0247-9.
8
[Benefits and risks of prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent in patients with stable coronary artery disease and diabetes].[药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后,稳定型冠状动脉疾病合并糖尿病患者长期双重抗血小板治疗的获益与风险]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2022 May 24;50(5):458-465. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20220114-00034.
9
Incidence, Patterns, and Impact of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Cessation Among Patients With and Without Chronic Kidney Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results From the PARIS Registry (Patterns of Non-Adherence to Anti-Platelet Regimens in Stented Patients).接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的慢性肾脏病患者和非慢性肾脏病患者中断双联抗血小板治疗的发生率、模式和影响:PARIS 登记研究(支架置入患者抗血小板治疗方案不依从模式)的结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Mar;11(3):e006144. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.006144.
10
Impact of clinical presentation on ischaemic and bleeding outcomes in patients receiving 6- or 24-month duration of dual-antiplatelet therapy after stent implantation: a pre-specified analysis from the PRODIGY (Prolonging Dual-Antiplatelet Treatment After Grading Stent-Induced Intimal Hyperplasia) trial.接受支架植入后 6 或 24 个月双抗血小板治疗的患者临床特征对缺血和出血结局的影响:来自 PRODIGY(评价支架内内膜增生后延长双联抗血小板治疗)试验的预先指定分析。
Eur Heart J. 2015 May 21;36(20):1242-51. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv038. Epub 2015 Feb 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between Charlson Comorbidity Index and in-hospital outcomes among aortic stenosis patients undergoing aortic valve replacement: an observational study at the National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases.接受主动脉瓣置换术的主动脉狭窄患者的Charlson合并症指数与住院结局之间的关联:一项在中国国家心血管病临床医学研究中心进行的观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 17;15(6):e083677. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083677.

本文引用的文献

1
A network-based study reveals multimorbidity patterns in people with type 2 diabetes.一项基于网络的研究揭示了2型糖尿病患者的多种合并症模式。
iScience. 2023 Sep 20;26(10):107979. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107979. eCollection 2023 Oct 20.
2
Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Health: A Presidential Advisory From the American Heart Association.心血管-肾脏-代谢健康:美国心脏协会的总统顾问报告
Circulation. 2023 Nov 14;148(20):1606-1635. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001184. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
3
Risk factors, outcomes and healthcare utilisation in individuals with multimorbidity including heart failure, chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a national electronic health record study.
患有心力衰竭、慢性肾脏病和 2 型糖尿病等多种疾病的个体的风险因素、结局和医疗保健利用情况:一项全国性电子健康记录研究。
Open Heart. 2023 Sep;10(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002332.
4
Multimorbidity prevalence and patterns in chronic kidney disease: findings from an observational multicentre UK cohort study.慢性肾脏病的多种合并症患病率和模式:来自英国多中心观察队列研究的结果。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2023 Aug;55(8):2047-2057. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03516-1. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
5
Multimorbidity patterns and association with mortality in 0.5 million Chinese adults.500 万中国成年人的多病模式及与死亡率的关系。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2022 Mar 20;135(6):648-657. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001985.
6
Hypertension in Diabetes: An Update of Basic Mechanisms and Clinical Disease.糖尿病中的高血压:基础机制和临床疾病的更新。
Hypertension. 2021 Nov;78(5):1197-1205. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.17981. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
7
Effects of Dapagliflozin in Patients With Kidney Disease, With and Without Heart Failure.达格列净在合并和不合并心力衰竭的肾脏病患者中的疗效。
JACC Heart Fail. 2021 Nov;9(11):807-820. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2021.06.017. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
8
Major bleeding risk and mortality associated with antiplatelet drugs in real-world clinical practice. A prospective cohort study.抗血小板药物在真实临床实践中的大出血风险和死亡率。一项前瞻性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 7;15(8):e0237022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237022. eCollection 2020.
9
Twelve-year clinical trajectories of multimorbidity in a population of older adults.十二年来老年人多病共存的临床轨迹。
Nat Commun. 2020 Jun 26;11(1):3223. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16780-x.
10
Statistical and Functional Studies Identify Epistasis of Cardiovascular Risk Genomic Variants From Genome-Wide Association Studies.统计和功能研究确定了来自全基因组关联研究的心血管风险基因组变异的上位性。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Apr 7;9(7):e014146. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014146. Epub 2020 Apr 2.