Adami Giovanni, Pedrollo Elisa, Rossini Maurizio, Fassio Angelo, Braga Vania, Pasetto Emma, Pollastri Francesco, Benini Camilla, Viapiana Ombretta, Gatti Davide
Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, 37134, Italy.
JBMR Plus. 2024 Feb 7;8(4):ziae016. doi: 10.1093/jbmrpl/ziae016. eCollection 2024 Apr.
Optimization of sequential and combination treatment is crucial in shaping long-term management of postmenopausal osteoporosis (OP).
We conducted a 6-month prospective observational study on postmenopausal women with severe OP receiving treatment with romosozumab either alone (in patients naïve to treatment) or in combination with ongoing long-term denosumab (>2 years) or continuing ongoing denosumab alone (>2 years). We collected serum samples for bone turnover markers, bone modulators, and calcium phosphate metabolism at baseline, month 3 and month 6. BMD was assessed at baseline and after 6 months.
Fifty-two postmenopausal women with OP were included in the study. Nineteen received romosozumab alone, 11 received romosozumab combined to ongoing denosumab, and 22 continued denosumab alone. BMD increased significantly at all sites at 6 months of follow-up in the romosozumab alone group (femoral neck +8.1%, total hip +6.8%, and lumbar spine +7.9%). In contrast, BMD increased significantly only at lumbar spine in the combination group (+7.2%) and in the denosumab group (+1.5%). P1nP increased significantly in romosozumab groups at month 3 (+70.4% in romosozumab alone group and +99.1% in combination group). Sclerostin levels increased steeply in both romosozumab groups, and Dkk1 did not change.
Romosozumab added to ongoing denosumab resulted in an increase in P1nP and lumbar spine BMD, but not in femoral neck BMD. For patients on denosumab, using romosozumab as an additional treatment appeared to be useful in terms of bone formation markers and spine BMD vs denosumab alone. Further randomized controlled trials, possibly powered to fracture outcomes, are needed to confirm our results.
序贯治疗和联合治疗的优化对于塑造绝经后骨质疏松症(OP)的长期管理至关重要。
我们对患有严重OP的绝经后女性进行了一项为期6个月的前瞻性观察研究,这些女性接受了单独使用罗莫单抗治疗(初治患者)或与持续使用超过2年的地诺单抗联合治疗,或仅继续单独使用持续超过2年的地诺单抗治疗。我们在基线、第3个月和第6个月收集血清样本以检测骨转换标志物、骨调节剂和钙磷代谢指标。在基线和6个月后评估骨密度。
52名患有OP的绝经后女性纳入研究。19名单独接受罗莫单抗治疗,11名接受罗莫单抗与持续使用的地诺单抗联合治疗,22名仅继续使用地诺单抗治疗。单独使用罗莫单抗组在随访6个月时所有部位的骨密度均显著增加(股骨颈增加8.1%,全髋增加6.8%,腰椎增加7.9%)。相比之下,联合治疗组仅腰椎骨密度显著增加(增加7.2%),地诺单抗组增加1.5%。单独使用罗莫单抗组和联合治疗组在第3个月时I型前胶原氨基端前肽(P1nP)显著增加(单独使用罗莫单抗组增加70.4%,联合治疗组增加99.1%)。两组罗莫单抗治疗组的硬化蛋白水平均急剧上升,而Dickkopf-1(Dkk1)未发生变化。
在持续使用地诺单抗基础上加用罗莫单抗可使P1nP和腰椎骨密度增加,但股骨颈骨密度未增加。对于使用地诺单抗的患者,与单独使用地诺单抗相比,加用罗莫单抗作为额外治疗在骨形成标志物和脊柱骨密度方面似乎是有益的。需要进一步的随机对照试验(可能以骨折结局为效能指标)来证实我们的结果。