Parmar Ronak P, Bakutra Gaurav V, Vishnoi Shivlal L, Nadig Priyadarshini, Rana Rutvik
Manubhai Patel Dental College & Hospital, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
Department of Periodontology & Implantology, Government Dental College & Hospital, Jamnagar, Gujarat, India.
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2024 May-Jun;14(3):252-256. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.03.007. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
Recently researches in the field of dental implantology have increased, in spite of that very limited knowledge is available to the patients about dental implants as an option for replacement of missing teeth. Goal of replacement of missing teeth is not only functional rehabilitation but overall improvement in quality of life of the patient.
To assess the awareness of dental implants and to compare oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL) in patients treated with implant supported fixed prosthesis (ISPs) and teeth supported fixed prosthesis (FPDs).
& Material: General implant awareness questionnaire was used to assess the awareness of dental implants in 500 participants. Oral health impact profile (OHIP) questionnaire was used to compare OHRQoL between 300 patients treated with ISPs and 300 patients treated with FPDs.
Sample size was taken to estimate difference between groups at 30 % & 80% power and 5% risk. IBM SPSS 20 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) was used for statistical analysis. Chi square test and independent - test was used to find statistical difference between variables.
27.2% participants were aware about dental implants. 74.4% participants agreed that missing teeth should be replaced with prosthetic options. Dentists were primary source of knowledge (66%) of dental implants for patients. Parameters like functional limitations, psychological discomfort and pain during mastication were significantly (p < 0.05) higher in FPDs compared to implant supported prosthesis.
Awareness of dental implants in general population needs to be increased. Functional and psychological comfort was significantly higher in ISPs compared to teeth supported FPDs.
尽管目前患者对牙种植体作为缺失牙替代选择的了解非常有限,但近年来牙种植学领域的研究有所增加。缺失牙替代的目标不仅是功能康复,还包括患者生活质量的全面改善。
评估患者对牙种植体的认知,并比较接受种植支持固定义齿(ISP)和牙支持固定义齿(FPD)治疗的患者的口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)。
使用一般种植体认知问卷评估500名参与者对牙种植体的认知。使用口腔健康影响程度(OHIP)问卷比较300名接受ISP治疗的患者和300名接受FPD治疗的患者的OHRQoL。
样本量按30%和80%的检验效能以及5%的风险估计组间差异。使用IBM SPSS 20(SPSS公司,伊利诺伊州芝加哥)进行统计分析。采用卡方检验和独立样本检验来发现变量之间的统计学差异。
27.2%的参与者了解牙种植体。74.4%的参与者同意缺失牙应采用修复方式替代。牙医是患者牙种植体知识的主要来源(66%)。与种植支持义齿相比,FPD在功能限制、心理不适和咀嚼时疼痛等参数方面显著更高(p<0.05)。
普通人群对牙种植体的认知需要提高。与牙支持的FPD相比,ISP在功能和心理舒适度方面显著更高。