Hillmeister Philipp, Li Kangbo, Dai Mengjun, Sacirovic Mesud, Pagonas Nikolaos, Ritter Oliver, Bramlage Peter, Bondke Persson Anja, Buschmann Ivo, Zemmrich Claudia
Department for Angiology, Center for Internal Medicine I, Deutsches Angiologie Zentrum (DAZB), University Clinic Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School (MHB) Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg/Havel, Germany.
Faculty of Health Sciences, Joint Faculty of the Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, The Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane and the University of Potsdam, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Mar 7;11:1302152. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1302152. eCollection 2024.
In the non-metropolitan region of Brandenburg (Germany), which is characterized by high rates of cardiovascular diseases and underserved medical care, there is a lack of awareness regarding lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] as a risk factor. In addition, data from patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in diverse regional backgrounds, including the understudied Brandenburg cohort, and various healthcare statuses remain insufficient.
In this WalkByLab study, Lp(a) levels were monitored in a non-metropolitan cohort ( = 850) in Brandenburg, Germany, comprising 533 patients at high cardiovascular risk and 317 healthy controls. Patients underwent a comprehensive angiological screening, which included blood serum analysis, assessment of medical and family history, cardiovascular risk, and disease status, and evaluation of lifestyle and quality of life. All parameters were evaluated with regard to two groups based on Lp(a) levels: low (<50 mg/dl) and high (≥50 mg/dl).
Brandenburg patients with cardiovascular diseases showed higher Lp(a) levels than healthy controls (24.2% vs. 14.8%, = 0.001). Logistic regression analysis with different characteristics revealed that Lp(a) was an independent risk factor significantly associated with ASCVD (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.32-3.95, = 0.003). The high-Lp(a) group showed a higher proportion of patients with coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease, or cerebrovascular disease compared to the low-Lp(a) group (50% vs. 36.8%; 57.7% vs. 45.8%; 17.6% vs. 9.2%; = 0.004); also, a higher percentage of patients in the high-Lp(a) group had heart failure (72.8% vs. 53.2%, = 0.014) and myocardial infarction (24.7% vs. 13.9%, = 0.001). The high-Lp(a) group exhibited higher rates of statins (63.1% vs. 50.4%, = 0.003), ezetimibe (14.8% vs. 5.5.%, = 0.001), and beta-blockers (55.7% vs. 40.7%, = 0.001) use. Lp(a) levels were found to be independent of physical activity or smoking behavior and did not change over time (12 months).
Our study highlights the significance of elevated Lp(a) levels in Brandenburg cardiovascular patients and identifies them as an independent risk factor for ASCVD, which has implications for addressing cardiovascular health of non-metropolitan populations.
在德国勃兰登堡州的非大都市地区,心血管疾病发病率高且医疗服务不足,人们对脂蛋白(a)[Lp(a)]作为一种风险因素缺乏认识。此外,来自不同地区背景(包括研究不足的勃兰登堡队列)和不同医疗状况的动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)患者的数据仍然不足。
在这项“边走边测”研究中,对德国勃兰登堡州一个非大都市队列(n = 850)的Lp(a)水平进行了监测,该队列包括533名心血管高风险患者和317名健康对照者。患者接受了全面的血管学筛查,包括血清分析、病史和家族史评估、心血管风险和疾病状况评估,以及生活方式和生活质量评估。所有参数根据Lp(a)水平分为两组进行评估:低水平(<50mg/dl)和高水平(≥50mg/dl)。
勃兰登堡州患有心血管疾病的患者Lp(a)水平高于健康对照者(24.2%对14.8%,P = 0.001)。对不同特征进行逻辑回归分析显示,Lp(a)是与ASCVD显著相关的独立风险因素(OR 2.26,95%CI 1.32 - 3.95,P = 0.003)。与低Lp(a)组相比,高Lp(a)组中患冠状动脉疾病、外周动脉疾病或脑血管疾病的患者比例更高(50%对36.8%;57.7%对45.8%;17.6%对9.2%;P = 0.004);此外,高Lp(a)组中患有心力衰竭(72.8%对53.2%,P = 0.014)和心肌梗死(24.7%对13.9%,P = 0.001)的患者百分比更高。高Lp(a)组他汀类药物(63.1%对50.4%,P = 0.003)、依折麦布(14.8%对5.5%,P = 0.001)和β受体阻滞剂(55.7%对40.7%,P = 0.001)的使用比例更高。发现Lp(a)水平与身体活动或吸烟行为无关,且在12个月内未发生变化。
我们的研究强调了勃兰登堡州心血管疾病患者中Lp(a)水平升高的重要性,并将其确定为ASCVD的独立风险因素,这对解决非大都市地区人群的心血管健康问题具有重要意义。