Suppr超能文献

临床决策支持的质量改进和研究原则。

Clinical Decision Support Principles for Quality Improvement and Research.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.

Divisions of Hospital Medicine.

出版信息

Hosp Pediatr. 2024 Apr 1;14(4):e219-e224. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2023-007540.

Abstract

Pediatric hospitalists frequently interact with clinical decision support (CDS) tools in patient care and use these tools for quality improvement or research. In this method/ology paper, we provide an introduction and practical approach to developing and evaluating CDS tools within the electronic health record. First, we define CDS and describe the types of CDS interventions that exist. We then outline a stepwise approach to CDS development, which begins with defining the problem and understanding the system. We present a framework for metric development and then describe tools that can be used for CDS design (eg, 5 Rights of CDS, "10 commandments," usability heuristics, human-centered design) and testing (eg, validation, simulation, usability testing). We review approaches to evaluating CDS tools, which range from randomized studies to traditional quality improvement methods. Lastly, we discuss practical considerations for implementing CDS, including the assessment of a project team's skills and an organization's information technology resources.

摘要

儿科住院医师在患者护理中经常与临床决策支持(CDS)工具交互,并将这些工具用于质量改进或研究。在本方法/学论文中,我们提供了在电子健康记录中开发和评估 CDS 工具的介绍和实用方法。首先,我们定义了 CDS,并描述了现有的 CDS 干预类型。然后,我们概述了 CDS 开发的逐步方法,该方法从定义问题和了解系统开始。我们提出了度量标准开发框架,然后描述了可用于 CDS 设计的工具(例如,CDS 的“5 项权利”,“十诫”,可用性启发式,以人为中心的设计)和测试(例如,验证,模拟,可用性测试)。我们回顾了评估 CDS 工具的方法,这些方法从随机研究到传统的质量改进方法都有。最后,我们讨论了实施 CDS 的实际考虑因素,包括评估项目团队的技能和组织的信息技术资源。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验