Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia.
Section of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024 Sep;166(3):1232-1239. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15482. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
To compare the pelvic lymph node involvement and risk of recurrence in patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated endocervical adenocarcinoma stage IA2-IB1 undergoing hysterectomy and/or trachelectomy plus lymphadenectomy, according to Silva's classification system.
A retrospective cohort study was performed in two Colombian cancer centers. The cases were classified according to the Silva classification system. Clinical, surgical, and histopathological variables were evaluated. Recurrence risk was analyzed by patterns A, B, or C. A logistic regression model was performed for tumor recurrence. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS). A weighted kappa was performed to determine the degree of concordance between pathologists.
A total of 100 patients were identified, 33% pattern A, 29% pattern B, and 38% pattern C. The median follow-up time was 42.5 months. No evidence of lymph node involvement was found in patients classified as A and B, while in the C pattern was observed in 15.8% (n = 6) of cases (P < 0.01). There were 7% of cases with recurrent disease, of which 71.5% corresponded to type C pattern. Patients with Silva pattern B and C had 1.22- and 4.46-fold increased risk of relapse, respectively, compared with pattern A. The 5-year DFS values by group were 100%, 96.1%, and 80.3% for patterns A, B, and C, respectively.
For patients with early-stage HPV-associated endocervical adenocarcinoma, the type C pattern presented more lymph node involvement and risk of recurrence compared to the A and B patterns. The concordance in diagnosis of different Silva's patterns by independents pathologists were good.
比较人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)相关子宫内膜腺癌ⅠA2-IB1 期行子宫切除术和/或广泛子宫颈切除术加淋巴结切除术患者,根据席尔瓦分类系统,评估盆淋巴结受累和复发风险。
对两家哥伦比亚癌症中心的回顾性队列研究进行分析。根据席尔瓦分类系统对病例进行分类。评估临床、手术和组织病理学变量。通过模式 A、B 或 C 分析复发风险。对肿瘤复发进行逻辑回归模型分析。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法估计总生存率和无病生存率(DFS)。采用加权 Kappa 检验评估病理学家之间的一致性程度。
共确定了 100 例患者,其中 33%为 A 型,29%为 B 型,38%为 C 型。中位随访时间为 42.5 个月。A 和 B 型患者未发现淋巴结受累,而 C 型患者中则有 15.8%(n=6)发现淋巴结受累(P<0.01)。有 7%的病例出现疾病复发,其中 71.5%与 C 型模式相关。与 A 型相比,B 型和 C 型患者的复发风险分别增加了 1.22 倍和 4.46 倍。根据组别的 5 年 DFS 值分别为 A、B 和 C 型 100%、96.1%和 80.3%。
对于早期 HPV 相关子宫内膜腺癌患者,C 型模式比 A 型和 B 型模式具有更高的淋巴结受累和复发风险。不同病理学家对席尔瓦不同模式的诊断一致性良好。