• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会经济剥夺与 SWOG 癌症临床试验入组患者的医疗保健使用。

Socioeconomic Deprivation and Health Care Use in Patients Enrolled in SWOG Cancer Clinical Trials.

机构信息

Columbia University, New York, New York.

SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e244008. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.4008.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.4008
PMID:38546646
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10979311/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Reducing acute care use is an important strategy for improving value. Patients with cancer are at risk for unplanned emergency department (ED) visits and hospital stays (HS). Clinical trial patients have homogeneous treatment; despite this, structural barriers to care may independently impact acute care use.

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether ED visits and HS within 12 months of trial enrollment are more common among Medicare enrollees who live in areas of socioeconomic deprivation or have Medicaid insurance.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study included patients with cancer who were 65 years or older and treated in SWOG Cancer Research Network trials from 1999 to 2018 using data linked to Medicare claims. Data were collected from 1999 to 2019 and analyzed from 2022 to 2024.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Outcomes were ED visits, HS, and costs in the first year following enrollment. Neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation was measured using patients' zip code linked to the Area Deprivation Index (ADI), measured on a 0 to 100 scale for increasing deprivation and categorized into tertiles (T1 to T3). Type of insurance was classified as Medicare with or without commercial insurance vs dual Medicare and Medicaid. Demographic, clinical, and prognostic factors were captured from trial records. Multivariable regression was used, and the association of ADI and insurance with each outcome was considered separately.

RESULTS

In total, 3027 trial participants were analyzed. The median (range) age was 71 (65-98) years, 1280 (32.3%) were female, 221 (7.3%) were Black patients, 2717 (89.8%) were White patients, 90 (3.0%) had Medicare and Medicaid insurance, and 660 (22.3%) were in the areas of highest deprivation (ADI-T3). In all, 1094 patients (36.1%) had an ED visit and 983 patients (32.4%) had an HS. In multivariable generalized estimating equation, patients living in areas categorized as ADI-T3 were more likely to have an ED visit (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.10-1.62; P = .004). A similar but nonsignificant pattern was observed for HS (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.96-1.93; P = .08). Patients from areas with the highest deprivation had a 62% increase in risk of either an ED visit or HS (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.25-2.09; P < .001). Patients with Medicare and Medicaid were 96% more likely to have an ED visit (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.56-2.46; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort of older patients enrolled in clinical trials, neighborhood deprivation and economic disadvantage were associated with an increase in ED visits and HS. Efforts are needed to ensure adequate resources to prevent unplanned use of acute care in socioeconomically vulnerable populations.

摘要

重要性

降低急性护理的使用是提高价值的一个重要策略。癌症患者有计划外急诊(ED)就诊和住院(HS)的风险。临床试验患者接受同质的治疗;尽管如此,护理的结构性障碍可能会独立影响急性护理的使用。

目的

检查医疗保险患者在试验登记后 12 个月内 ED 就诊和 HS 是否更常见,这些患者居住在社会经济贫困地区或拥有医疗补助保险。

设计、设置和参与者:本队列研究纳入了 1999 年至 2018 年期间在 SWOG 癌症研究网络试验中接受治疗的 65 岁及以上的癌症患者,使用与医疗保险索赔相关的数据进行分析。数据收集于 1999 年至 2019 年,并于 2022 年至 2024 年进行分析。

主要结果和措施

结果是登记后第一年的 ED 就诊、HS 和费用。使用患者与区域剥夺指数(ADI)相关联的邮政编码衡量邻里社会经济剥夺程度,ADI 以 0 到 100 的分数衡量,分数越高表示剥夺程度越高,并分为三分位数(T1 到 T3)。保险类型分为有或没有商业保险的医疗保险与双重医疗保险和医疗补助。从试验记录中捕获了人口统计学、临床和预后因素。使用多变量回归,分别考虑 ADI 和保险与每个结果的关联。

结果

总共分析了 3027 名试验参与者。中位(范围)年龄为 71(65-98)岁,1280 名(32.3%)为女性,221 名(7.3%)为黑人患者,2717 名(89.8%)为白人患者,90 名(3.0%)拥有医疗保险和医疗补助保险,660 名(22.3%)处于剥夺程度最高的地区(ADI-T3)。共有 1094 名患者(36.1%)有 ED 就诊,983 名患者(32.4%)有 HS。在多变量广义估计方程中,居住在被归类为 ADI-T3 的地区的患者更有可能进行 ED 就诊(OR,1.34;95%CI,1.10-1.62;P=0.004)。对于 HS 也观察到类似但不显著的模式(OR,1.36;95%CI,0.96-1.93;P=0.08)。来自贫困程度最高地区的患者有 62%的风险增加 ED 就诊或 HS(OR,1.62;95%CI,1.25-2.09;P<0.001)。拥有医疗保险和医疗补助的患者进行 ED 就诊的可能性增加 96%(OR,1.96;95%CI,1.56-2.46;P<0.001)。

结论和相关性

在这项纳入临床试验的老年患者队列研究中,邻里贫困和经济劣势与 ED 就诊和 HS 增加有关。需要努力确保为社会经济弱势群体提供足够的资源,以预防急性护理的无计划使用。

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic Deprivation and Health Care Use in Patients Enrolled in SWOG Cancer Clinical Trials.社会经济剥夺与 SWOG 癌症临床试验入组患者的医疗保健使用。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e244008. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.4008.
2
Racial Disparities in Outcomes After THA and TKA Are Substantially Mediated by Socioeconomic Disadvantage Both in Black and White Patients.THA 和 TKA 术后结局的种族差异在黑人和白人患者中均主要由社会经济劣势所介导。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Feb 1;481(2):254-264. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002392. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
3
Patient Sociodemographics and Comorbidities and Birth Hospital Characteristics Associated With Postpartum Emergency Department Care.患者人口统计学特征和合并症以及分娩医院特征与产后急诊科护理相关。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e233927. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.3927.
4
Associations between health insurance status, neighborhood deprivation, and treatment delays in women with breast cancer living in Georgia.佐治亚州女性乳腺癌患者的医疗保险状况、居住社区贫困程度与治疗延误的相关性。
Cancer Med. 2023 Aug;12(16):17331-17339. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6341. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
5
Association of Race/Ethnicity With Emergency Department Destination of Emergency Medical Services Transport.种族/民族与紧急医疗服务转运的急诊科去向的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1910816. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10816.
6
Healthcare utilization and cost of care in elderly breast cancer patients enrolled in SWOG clinical trials.在 SWOG 临床试验中入组的老年乳腺癌患者的医疗保健利用和护理费用。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jun;181(2):455-463. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05634-1. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
7
Trends and Characteristics of Potentially Preventable Emergency Department Visits Among Patients With Cancer in the US.美国癌症患者中潜在可预防的急诊科就诊趋势和特征。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2250423. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.50423.
8
Area Vulnerability and Disparities in Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.转移性肾细胞癌患者治疗中的地区脆弱性和差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e248747. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.8747.
9
Comparison of Area Deprivation Index, Socioeconomic Parameters, and Preoperative Demographics With Postoperative Emergency Department Visits After Total Knee Arthroplasty.比较全膝关节置换术后与术后急诊就诊的地区贫困指数、社会经济参数和术前人口统计学。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Aug;36(8):2788-2794. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.03.058. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
10
Comparison of Utilization, Costs, and Quality of Medicaid vs Subsidized Private Health Insurance for Low-Income Adults.比较 Medicaid 与补贴私人医疗保险对低收入成年人的利用、成本和质量。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2032669. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.32669.

引用本文的文献

1
A retrospective study of the impact of comorbidity, polypharmacy and demographic factors on patient inclusion and healthcare delivery in phase I oncology trials.一项关于合并症、多种药物治疗及人口统计学因素对I期肿瘤试验中患者纳入及医疗服务影响的回顾性研究。
BJC Rep. 2025 Aug 25;3(1):57. doi: 10.1038/s44276-025-00165-y.
2
Patterns of Referral for Common Cancer Surgery in the United States.美国常见癌症手术的转诊模式。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 May;32(5):3429-3440. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17026-0. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
3
The Grip Strength Loss Rate and the Subsequent Cognitive Decline Rate in Older Adults: The Moderating Role of Social Isolation.老年人握力丧失率与随后的认知衰退率:社会隔离的调节作用
Innov Aging. 2024 Jun 4;8(8):igae055. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igae055. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Remote Symptom Monitoring With Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes on Hospitalization, Survival, and Cost in Community Oncology Practice: The Texas Two-Step Study.远程症状监测联合电子患者报告结局对社区肿瘤学实践中住院、生存和成本的影响:德克萨斯两步研究。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2023 Sep;7:e2300182. doi: 10.1200/CCI.23.00182.
2
Identification and Characterization of Avoidable Hospital Admissions in Patients With Lung Cancer.肺癌患者可避免住院的识别和特征描述。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023 Oct;21(10):1050-1057.e13. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.7049.
3
Thirty-Day Unplanned Hospital Readmissions in Patients With Cancer and the Impact of Social Determinants of Health: A Machine Learning Approach.癌症患者 30 天内非计划性住院再入院情况及健康社会决定因素的影响:一种机器学习方法。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2023 Jul;7:e2200143. doi: 10.1200/CCI.22.00143.
4
Effect of Electronic Symptom Monitoring on Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Patients With Metastatic Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.电子症状监测对转移性癌症患者报告结局的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2022 Jun 28;327(24):2413-2422. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.9265.
5
Increasing Racial and Ethnic Diversity in Cancer Clinical Trials: An American Society of Clinical Oncology and Association of Community Cancer Centers Joint Research Statement.提高癌症临床试验中的种族和民族多样性:美国临床肿瘤学会和社区癌症中心协会联合研究声明。
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jul 1;40(19):2163-2171. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00754. Epub 2022 May 19.
6
Neighborhood and Individual Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Survival Among Patients With Nonmetastatic Common Cancers.社区和个体社会经济劣势与非转移性常见癌症患者的生存。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2139593. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.39593.
7
Cancer Outcomes Among Medicare Beneficiaries And Their Younger Uninsured Counterparts.医疗保险受益人和他们年轻的未参保对照者的癌症结局。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 May;40(5):754-762. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01839.
8
Persistent Disparity: Socioeconomic Deprivation and Cancer Outcomes in Patients Treated in Clinical Trials.持续存在的差距:临床试验治疗患者的社会经济剥夺与癌症结局。
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Apr 20;39(12):1339-1348. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02602. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
9
Association of Patient Demographic Characteristics and Insurance Status With Survival in Cancer Randomized Clinical Trials With Positive Findings.患者人口统计学特征和保险状况与阳性发现的癌症随机临床试验生存的相关性研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e203842. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3842.
10
Persistent inequalities in unplanned hospitalisation among colon cancer patients across critical phases of their care pathway, England, 2011-13.2011-13 年,英格兰结肠癌患者在其护理路径的关键阶段,非计划性住院方面持续存在不平等现象。
Br J Cancer. 2018 Aug;119(5):551-557. doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0170-2. Epub 2018 Aug 15.