• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于科尔卡巴理论模型的危重症患者舒适度感知

The comfort perception in the critically ill patient from the Kolcaba theoretical model.

作者信息

Gonzalez-Baz M D, Pacheco-Del Cerro E, Durango-Limárquez M I, Alcantarilla-Martín A, Romero-Arribas R, Ledesma-Fajardo J, Moro-Tejedor M N

机构信息

Departamento de Apoyo a la Práctica Basada en la Evidencia, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (Madrid), Departamento de Enfermería. Facultad de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), Madrid, Spain.

Departamento de Enfermería. Facultad de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Nursing Management, Hospital Clínico Universitario de San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Enferm Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2024 Oct-Dec;35(4):264-277. doi: 10.1016/j.enfie.2024.03.001. Epub 2024 Mar 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.enfie.2024.03.001
PMID:38548548
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The stay in a critical care unit (CCU) has a serious impact on physical condition causing numerous discomfort factors such as pain or difficulty in communicating. All of these are associated with possible sequelae following discharge from the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) named post-ICU syndrome. The Kolcaba Comfort Theory allows, from a holistic approach, to identify care needs from the patient's perspective using instruments such as the General Comfort Questionnaire (GCQ).

OBJECTIVES

To determine the comfort level of patients admitted to the CCU using the GCQ of Kolcaba and to identify the discomfort factors.

METHODS

Cross-sectional descriptive observational prospective study.

POPULATION

580 patients admitted to adult CCU of two high complexity hospitals from June 2015 to March 2020 with stay ≥24 h were interviewed. Descriptive analysis, Student's t-test and ANOVA and multivariate analysis were performed using SPSS v26 and STATA v16.

RESULTS

The mean age was 52,62 (16,21), 357 (61,6%) were male and 434 (74,8%) were believers. The type of admission was planned in 322 (55,5%) and the most prevalent reason for admission was surgical 486 (83,8%). The median pain score (NRS) was 3,00 [0-4] and severity score (APACHE II) was 13,26 (5,89), the median length of stay was 4,00 [2-7] days. The mean comfort level was 3,02 (0,31) showing the highest value Reanimation 3.02 (0.30) and the lowest Trauma and Emergency Unit 2.95 (0.38). Statistically significant differences were found between the units in the comfort level of patients >65 years of age (p = 0.029). The Relief comfort type obtained the lowest mean 2.81 (0.33) and the physical context 2.75 (0.41) in the three units. In the multivariate analysis, statistically significant differences were found between the comfort level and the pain level: no pain (p = 0,000) OR 4,361 CI [2,184-8,707], mild pain (p = 0,000) OR 4,007 CI [2,068-7,763], moderate pain (p = 0,007) OR 2,803 CI [1,328-5,913], and the APACHE II score equal to or greater than 10 (p = 0,000) OR 0,472 CI [0,316-0,705].

CONCLUSIONS

The comfort level showed high scores in all three units. The physical and environmental contexts and the relief comfort type negatively affected the perception of comfort. The variables that explained comfort were pain and severity of illness. The evaluation of comfort from the patient's perspective through the GCQ could be considered an indicator of quality of nursing interventions.

摘要

背景

在重症监护病房(CCU)的住院经历会对身体状况产生严重影响,引发诸多不适因素,如疼痛或沟通困难。所有这些都与重症监护病房(ICU)出院后可能出现的后遗症相关,即所谓的ICU后综合征。科尔卡巴舒适理论允许从整体方法出发,使用诸如一般舒适问卷(GCQ)等工具从患者角度确定护理需求。

目的

使用科尔卡巴的GCQ确定入住CCU患者的舒适水平,并识别不适因素。

方法

横断面描述性观察性前瞻性研究。

研究对象

对2015年6月至2020年3月期间入住两家高复杂性医院成人CCU且住院时间≥24小时的580例患者进行了访谈。使用SPSS v26和STATA v16进行描述性分析、学生t检验、方差分析和多变量分析。

结果

平均年龄为52.62岁(16.21岁),男性357例(61.6%),信徒434例(74.8%)。322例(55.5%)为计划性入院,最常见的入院原因是手术,共486例(83.8%)。疼痛评分中位数(NRS)为3.00[0 - 4],严重程度评分(APACHE II)为13.26(5.89),住院时间中位数为4.00[2 - 7]天。平均舒适水平为3.02(0.31),其中复苏科室得分最高,为3.02(0.30),创伤与急诊科得分最低,为2.95(0.38)。在65岁以上患者的舒适水平方面,各科室之间存在统计学显著差异(p = 0.029)。在三个科室中,缓解舒适类型的平均得分最低,为2.81(0.33),身体环境方面为2.75(0.41)。在多变量分析中,舒适水平与疼痛水平之间存在统计学显著差异:无疼痛(p = 0.000),比值比(OR)为4.361,置信区间(CI)为[2.184 - 8.707];轻度疼痛(p = 0.000),OR为4.007,CI为[2.(此处原文有误,应为2.068) - 7.763];中度疼痛(p = 0.007),OR为2.803,CI为[1.328 - 5.913];以及APACHE II评分等于或大于10(p = 0.000),OR为0.472,CI为[0.316 - 0.705]。

结论

所有三个科室的舒适水平得分都较高。身体和环境背景以及缓解舒适类型对舒适感的认知产生了负面影响。解释舒适感的变量是疼痛和疾病严重程度。通过GCQ从患者角度评估舒适感可被视为护理干预质量的一个指标。

相似文献

1
The comfort perception in the critically ill patient from the Kolcaba theoretical model.基于科尔卡巴理论模型的危重症患者舒适度感知
Enferm Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2024 Oct-Dec;35(4):264-277. doi: 10.1016/j.enfie.2024.03.001. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
2
Psychometric validation of the Kolcaba General Comfort Questionnaire in critically ill patients.危重症患者科卡巴一般舒适问卷的心理计量学验证。
Aust Crit Care. 2023 Nov;36(6):1025-1034. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2022.12.013. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
3
[Clinical characteristics of critically ill pregnant women with different admission methods to intensive care unit: data analysis from 2006 to 2019 in the university hospital].[重症监护病房不同收治方式的危重症孕妇临床特征:某大学医院2006年至2019年数据分析]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Oct;33(10):1249-1254. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20210106-00013.
4
Not All Discharge Settings Are Created Equal: Thirty-Day Readmission Risk after Elective Colorectal Surgery.并非所有出院环境都相同:择期结直肠手术后 30 天再入院风险。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Sep;63(9):1302-1309. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001727.
5
Critically ill patients' experiences of discomfort and comfort in the intensive care unit: A qualitative descriptive study.重症患者在重症监护病房的不适与舒适体验:一项质性描述性研究。
Aust Crit Care. 2025 Mar;38(2):101115. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2024.08.011. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
6
[Predictive value of six critical illness scores for 28-day death risk in comprehensive and specialized intensive care unit patients based on MIMIC-IV database].基于MIMIC-IV数据库的综合及专科重症监护病房患者28天死亡风险的六种危重病评分的预测价值
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2022 Jul;34(7):752-758. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20220304-00205.
7
Perceived Discomfort in Patients admitted to Intensive Care (DETECT DISCOMFORT 1): a prospective observational study.重症监护病房患者的感知不适(DETECT DISCOMFORT 1):一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Crit Care Resusc. 2019 Jun;21(2):103-109.
8
Pronóstico de pacientes con lupus eritematoso generalizado en una unidad de cuidados intensivos.重症监护病房中系统性红斑狼疮患者的预后
Gac Med Mex. 2018;154(4):468-472. doi: 10.24875/GMM.18003614.
9
Analysis of readmission rates to the intensive care unit after implementation of a rapid response team in a University Hospital.分析在一所大学附属医院实施快速反应团队后 ICU 再入院率。
Med Intensiva. 2017 Oct;41(7):411-417. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2016.11.003. Epub 2017 Jan 7.
10
A planned admission protocol application in intensive care units.在重症监护病房应用计划入院协议。
Nurs Crit Care. 2017 Nov;22(6):362-371. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12194. Epub 2015 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
The factors affecting comfort and the comfort levels of patients hospitalized in the coronary intensive care unit: A descriptive-analytical study.影响冠心病重症监护病房住院患者舒适度及舒适水平的因素:一项描述性分析研究。
Saudi Med J. 2025 May;46(5):522-528. doi: 10.15537/smj.2025.46.5.20240702.
2
Impact of Authentic Leadership on Nurses' Ethically Oriented Practices and Patient-Oriented Outcomes: A Multilevel Analysis.真实领导对护士的道德导向实践和以患者为导向的结果的影响:一项多层次分析。
J Nurs Manag. 2025 Mar 30;2025:5336957. doi: 10.1155/jonm/5336957. eCollection 2025.