• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

竞争时间:一种被忽视的维持多样性的竞争机制的证据。

Competition for time: Evidence for an overlooked, diversity-maintaining competitive mechanism.

机构信息

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.

出版信息

Ecol Lett. 2024 Mar;27(3):e14422. doi: 10.1111/ele.14422.

DOI:10.1111/ele.14422
PMID:38549235
Abstract

Understanding how diversity is maintained in plant communities requires that we first understand the mechanisms of competition for limiting resources. In ecology, there is an underappreciated but fundamental distinction between systems in which the depletion of limiting resources reduces the growth rates of competitors and systems in which resource depletion reduces the time available for competitors to grow, a mechanism we call 'competition for time'. Importantly, modern community ecology and our framing of the coexistence problem are built on the implicit assumption that competition reduces the growth rate. However, recent theoretical work suggests competition for time may be the predominant competitive mechanism in a broad array of natural communities, a significant advance given that when species compete for time, diversity-maintaining trade-offs emerge organically. In this study, we first introduce competition for time conceptually using a simple model of interacting species. Then, we perform an experiment in a Mediterranean annual grassland to determine whether competition for time is an important competitive mechanism in a field system. Indeed, we find that species respond to increased competition through reductions in their lifespan rather than their rate of growth. In total, our study suggests competition for time may be overlooked as a mechanism of biodiversity maintenance.

摘要

要理解植物群落中的多样性是如何维持的,我们首先需要了解竞争有限资源的机制。在生态学中,有一种被低估但很基本的区分,即资源耗尽会降低竞争者生长速度的系统,和资源耗尽会减少竞争者生长时间的系统,我们将后者称为“竞争时间”。重要的是,现代群落生态学和我们对共存问题的框架是建立在竞争降低生长速度的隐含假设之上的。然而,最近的理论工作表明,竞争时间可能是广泛的自然群落中的主要竞争机制,这是一个重大进展,因为当物种竞争时间时,多样性维持的权衡就会自然出现。在这项研究中,我们首先使用一个简单的相互作用物种模型从概念上介绍竞争时间。然后,我们在一个地中海一年生草原进行了一项实验,以确定竞争时间是否是一个野外系统中的重要竞争机制。事实上,我们发现物种通过减少寿命而不是生长速度来应对竞争的增加。总的来说,我们的研究表明,竞争时间可能是一个被忽视的维持生物多样性的机制。

相似文献

1
Competition for time: Evidence for an overlooked, diversity-maintaining competitive mechanism.竞争时间:一种被忽视的维持多样性的竞争机制的证据。
Ecol Lett. 2024 Mar;27(3):e14422. doi: 10.1111/ele.14422.
2
Rapid transgenerational adaptation in response to intercropping reduces competition.快速的跨代适应响应间作对竞争的减少。
Elife. 2022 Sep 13;11:e77577. doi: 10.7554/eLife.77577.
3
Nutrient levels and trade-offs control diversity in a serial dilution ecosystem.营养水平和权衡控制连续稀释生态系统中的多样性。
Elife. 2020 Sep 11;9:e57790. doi: 10.7554/eLife.57790.
4
Spatial ecology of territorial populations.领域种群的空间生态学。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Sep 3;116(36):17874-17879. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1911570116. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
5
Competition for water and species coexistence in phenologically structured annual plant communities.物候结构一年生植物群落中的水分竞争与物种共存
Ecol Lett. 2022 May;25(5):1110-1125. doi: 10.1111/ele.13990. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
6
Competition drives clumpy species coexistence in estuarine phytoplankton.竞争促进了河口浮游植物中块状物种的共存。
Sci Rep. 2013;3:1037. doi: 10.1038/srep01037. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
7
Competitive exclusion, beta diversity, and deterministic vs. stochastic drivers of community assembly.竞争排斥、β多样性以及群落组装的确定性和随机性驱动因素。
Ecol Lett. 2014 Nov;17(11):1400-8. doi: 10.1111/ele.12343. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
8
Dispersal network heterogeneity promotes species coexistence in hierarchical competitive communities.分散网络异质性促进分层竞争群落中物种共存。
Ecol Lett. 2021 Jan;24(1):50-59. doi: 10.1111/ele.13619. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
9
No evidence for trade-offs in plant responses to consumer food web manipulations.没有证据表明植物对消费者食物网操纵的反应存在权衡。
Ecology. 2018 Sep;99(9):1953-1963. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2389. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
10
Diverse phylogenetic neighborhoods enhance community resistance to drought in experimental assemblages.多样的系统发育小生境增强了实验组合体对干旱的群落抗性。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 18;11(1):22499. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01991-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Competitor-induced plasticity modifies the interactions and predicted competitive outcomes between annual plants.竞争者诱导的可塑性改变了一年生植物之间的相互作用和预测的竞争结果。
Ecology. 2025 May;106(5):e70085. doi: 10.1002/ecy.70085.