State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, Department of Microbiology and Infectious Disease Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.
Institute of hepatology, Tianjin Second People's Hospital, Tianjin, China.
J Med Virol. 2024 Apr;96(4):e29569. doi: 10.1002/jmv.29569.
The natural progression of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is dynamic, but the longitudinal landscape of HBV serological markers with host antiviral immune response relevant hepatic inflammatory damage remains undetermined. To this issue, we studied the association of HBV serological markers with the severity of hepatic inflammatory damage and enumerated HBV-specific T cells using the cultured enzyme-linked immune absorbent spot (ELISpot). Five hundred and twenty-four treatment-naïve chronic HBV infection patients were enrolled. The Spearman correlation analysis revealed that in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients, all HBV virologic indicators negatively correlated with liver inflammatory damage and fibrosis (p < 0.01). Stronger correlations were accessed in the subgroup of HBeAg-positive patients with HBV DNA > 2 × 10 IU/mL (p < 0.01), whereas negative correlations disappeared in patients with HBV DNA ≤ 2 × 10 IU/mL. Surprisingly, in HBeAg-negative patients, the HBV DNA level was positively correlated with the hepatic inflammatory damage (p < 0.01). The relationship between type Ⅱ interferon genes expression and HBV DNA levels also revealed a direct shift from the initial negative to positive in HBeAg-positive patients with HBV DNA declined below 2 × 10 IU/mL. The number of HBV-specific T cells were identified by interferon γ ELISpot assays and showed a significant increase from HBeAg-positive to HBeAg-negative group. The host's anti-HBV immunity remains effective in HBeAg-positive patients with HBV DNA levels exceeding 2 × 10 IU/mL, as it efficiently eliminates infected hepatocytes and inhibits HBV replication. However, albeit the increasing number of HBV-specific T cells, the host antiviral immune response shifts towards dysfunctional when the HBV DNA load drops below this threshold, which causes more pathological damage and disease progression.
慢性乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染的自然病程是动态的,但与宿主抗病毒免疫反应相关的 HBV 血清学标志物与肝炎症性损伤的纵向特征仍不确定。针对这一问题,我们研究了 HBV 血清学标志物与肝炎症性损伤严重程度的相关性,并使用培养酶联免疫吸附斑点(ELISpot)技术对 HBV 特异性 T 细胞进行了计数。共纳入 524 例未经治疗的慢性 HBV 感染患者。Spearman 相关性分析显示,在 HBeAg 阳性患者中,所有 HBV 病毒学指标与肝炎症损伤和纤维化均呈负相关(p<0.01)。在 HBV DNA>2×10 IU/mL 的 HBeAg 阳性患者亚组中,相关性更强(p<0.01),而 HBV DNA≤2×10 IU/mL 的患者中相关性消失。令人惊讶的是,在 HBeAg 阴性患者中,HBV DNA 水平与肝炎症损伤呈正相关(p<0.01)。干扰素基因表达类型与 HBV DNA 水平的关系也表明,在 HBV DNA 下降至 2×10 IU/mL 以下的 HBeAg 阳性患者中,这种关系从最初的负相关直接转变为正相关。通过干扰素γ ELISpot 检测鉴定 HBV 特异性 T 细胞的数量,并显示出从 HBeAg 阳性组到 HBeAg 阴性组的显著增加。在 HBV DNA 水平超过 2×10 IU/mL 的 HBeAg 阳性患者中,宿主的抗 HBV 免疫仍然有效,因为它可以有效清除感染的肝细胞并抑制 HBV 复制。然而,尽管 HBV 特异性 T 细胞数量增加,但当 HBV DNA 负荷降至该阈值以下时,宿主抗病毒免疫反应会转向功能失调,从而导致更多的病理损伤和疾病进展。