Suppr超能文献

向医学生传授临床推理:基于案例的临床推理方法简要报告

Teaching clinical reasoning to medical students: A brief report of case-based clinical reasoning approach.

作者信息

Alavi-Moghaddam Mostafa, Zeinaddini-Meymand Arman, Ahmadi Soleiman, Shirani Aryan

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Feb 26;13:42. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_355_23. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Case-based clinical reasoning (CBCR) is the proposed method to improve clinical reasoning. This brief report aimed to evaluate CBCR effectiveness to improve clinical reasoning via an online course.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

This study is a brief report of a before-after quasi-experimental study to evaluate CBCR in medical students of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten online weekly 2-hour sessions of CBCR presentations were instructed to medical students. Each session started with an illness script, and then, the instructor posed the students' five clinical questions in five steps according to the CBCR approach. The clinical reasoning ability of students was evaluated before and 2 weeks after the online courses using four types of standard clinical questions.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to assess the difference between pretest and posttest examination scores.

RESULTS

This brief report revealed that twenty-one medical students participated in all ten sessions of the CBCR online course and were evaluated in pretest and posttest examinations. A significant improvement in the clinical reasoning total scores in the posttest examination compared with the pretest examination was observed ( = 0.001). In terms of specific types of clinical questions, the mean posttest scores for clinical reasoning problem (CRP) and key feature (KF) examinations were higher than the pretest scores ( = 0.001 and = 0.005, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Applying the CBCR approach improved the total clinical reasoning score of medical students during the course. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether this improvement would persist in workplace settings or not.

摘要

背景

基于病例的临床推理(CBCR)是一种旨在提高临床推理能力的方法。本简要报告旨在通过在线课程评估CBCR在提高临床推理能力方面的有效性。

设置与设计

本研究是一项前后对照准实验研究的简要报告,旨在评估设拉子医科大学医学生的CBCR情况。

材料与方法

为医学生安排了为期十周、每周两小时的CBCR在线课程。每节课都从一个病例脚本开始,然后教师按照CBCR方法分五步向学生提出五个临床问题。在在线课程开始前和结束两周后,使用四种标准临床问题对学生的临床推理能力进行评估。

统计分析方法

采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验评估前后测考试成绩的差异。

结果

本简要报告显示,21名医学生参加了CBCR在线课程的所有十节课,并接受了前后测考试评估。与前测相比,后测的临床推理总成绩有显著提高(P = 0.001)。就特定类型的临床问题而言,临床推理问题(CRP)和关键特征(KF)考试的后测平均成绩高于前测成绩(分别为P = 0.001和P = 0.005)。

结论

应用CBCR方法提高了医学生在课程期间的临床推理总成绩。需要进一步研究以评估这种提高在工作场所环境中是否会持续存在。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

10
Clinical errors and medical negligence.临床差错和医疗事故。
Med Princ Pract. 2013;22(4):323-33. doi: 10.1159/000346296. Epub 2013 Jan 18.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验