Wang Zhuo, Hu Han-Shuo, Zhao Li-Mei, Li Yu, Liu Xiao-Dong
Department of Pharmacy, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Department of the Second Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Mar 14;15:1324848. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1324848. eCollection 2024.
Prophylactic antibacterial drugs are used for patients with liver cirrhosis and upper gastrointestinal bleeding, and independent studies have concluded that they can decrease the rate of infection, mortality, and rebleeding in these diseases. However, no comprehensive assessment of this effect has been reported in recent years and available data pertaining to the prognostic implications of diverse categories of antibiotic prophylaxis in individuals afflicted with cirrhosis are notably limited. The objective of this article is to assess the clinical effectiveness of prophylactic antibacterial drugs for patients with liver cirrhosis and upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Relevant randomized controlled studies and cohort studies which examined the value of prophylactic antibacterial drugs for patients with liver cirrhosis and upper gastrointestinal bleeding were retrieved via Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MedLine, and Web of Science. The search period was from database inception until 30 April 2023. Summing up the relevant data, the dichotomous variable was statistically analysed using the relative risk (RR) value and its 95% confidence interval (CI) and the continuous variable using the mean difference (MD) value and its 95% CI. All analyses were performed using Revman 5.4 software. The study has been registered on the PROSPERO website under registration number CRD42022343352. Twenty-six studies (18 RCTs and 8 cohort studies, including 13,670 participants) were included to evaluate the effect of antibacterial prophylaxis no antibacterial prophylaxis or placebo. Prophylactic antibiotics reduced mortality rates (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.51-0.83), infection rates (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.35-0.49), rebleeding rates (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.31-0.56), and length of hospital stay (MD -5.29, 95% CI -7.53, -3.04). Subgroup analysis revealed that the prophylactic administration of quinolone antimicrobials demonstrated the most favorable efficacy, followed by cephalosporins. Both interventions were effective in averting infections frequently observed in patients with liver cirrhosis and upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Based on our investigation, the prophylactic antibacterial drugs confers noteworthy advantages in patients afflicted by liver cirrhosis with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. It has been associated with reductions in mortality, infection incidence, rebleeding occurrences, and the duration of hospitalization. Among prophylactic antibacterial options, quinolones emerged as the foremost choice, with cephalosporins ranking closely thereafter. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022343352, identifier CRD42022343352.
预防性抗菌药物用于肝硬化和上消化道出血患者,独立研究得出结论,这些药物可降低这些疾病的感染率、死亡率和再出血率。然而,近年来尚未有对这种效果的全面评估报告,且关于不同类别抗生素预防对肝硬化患者预后影响的现有数据明显有限。本文的目的是评估预防性抗菌药物对肝硬化和上消化道出血患者的临床疗效。通过Cochrane图书馆、EMBASE、MedLine和Web of Science检索了相关的随机对照研究和队列研究,这些研究探讨了预防性抗菌药物对肝硬化和上消化道出血患者的价值。检索期从数据库建立至2023年4月30日。汇总相关数据后,使用相对风险(RR)值及其95%置信区间(CI)对二分变量进行统计分析,使用平均差(MD)值及其95%CI对连续变量进行统计分析。所有分析均使用Revman 5.4软件进行。该研究已在PROSPERO网站注册,注册号为CRD42022343352。纳入了26项研究(18项随机对照试验和8项队列研究,包括13670名参与者)以评估抗菌预防(无抗菌预防或安慰剂)的效果。预防性抗生素降低了死亡率(RR 0.66,95%CI 0.51 - 0.83)、感染率(RR 0.41,95%CI 0.35 - 0.49)、再出血率(RR 0.42,95%CI 0.31 - 0.56)以及住院时间(MD -5.29,95%CI -7.53,-3.04)。亚组分析显示,喹诺酮类抗菌药物的预防性给药显示出最有利的疗效,其次是头孢菌素。两种干预措施在预防肝硬化和上消化道出血患者常见感染方面均有效。基于我们的调查,预防性抗菌药物对肝硬化合并上消化道出血患者具有显著优势。它与死亡率降低、感染发生率降低、再出血发生率降低以及住院时间缩短有关。在预防性抗菌药物选择中,喹诺酮类成为首选,头孢菌素紧随其后。系统评价注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022343352,标识符CRD42022343352。