Kornelsen Jude, Taylor Matilda, Ebert Sean, Skinner Tom, Stoll Kathrin
Centre for Rural Health Research, Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Rural Coordination Centre of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Digit Health. 2024 Mar 28;10:20552076241242667. doi: 10.1177/20552076241242667. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
Rural patients face barriers to accessing surgical care and often need to travel long distance for pre- or post-surgical consultations. Although adaptation to the COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated the efficacy of virtual care, there is minimal data available to evaluate patient satisfaction with this modality and consequent health service utilization if virtual services are not available.
An online survey was conducted with participants living in rural British Columbia, Canada who had undergone surgery within 12 months of data collection and had either virtual or face-to-face pre- or post-surgical consultations. It was supplemented by an in-person survey administered in two rural sites to all patients who had a virtual visit prior to undergoing procedural care. A ten-point scale was used to assess satisfaction. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected and analyzed.
Findings from the province-wide survey (n = 163) revealed no significant differences in average satisfaction ratings between people with in-person and virtual surgical consultations (8.03 versus 8.38, = 0.26). However, most participants indicated that virtual appointments saved them time traveling, energy, and money and made them less dependent on others, accruing significant social benefit.In the community-focused sample (n = 71), 38% said they would not have had the procedure without a virtual visit option and 21% said that they would have delayed the procedure. Virtual consultations saved patients an average of 9 h (range 1-90). Participants traveled an average of 427 kilometers round trip to have the procedures.
Findings reveal costs and time saved in accessing care due to the introduction of pre- and post-operative virtual care visits, and further investments in virtual care are warranted. This will contribute to promoting equitable access to healthcare for rural residents.
农村患者在获得外科护理方面面临障碍,通常需要长途跋涉进行术前或术后会诊。尽管适应新冠疫情已证明虚拟护理的有效性,但如果没有虚拟服务,可用于评估患者对这种方式的满意度以及随之而来的医疗服务利用情况的数据极少。
对居住在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省农村地区、在数据收集前12个月内接受过手术且进行过虚拟或面对面术前或术后会诊的参与者进行了在线调查。通过在两个农村地点对所有在接受手术护理前进行过虚拟就诊的患者进行的面对面调查进行补充。使用10分制来评估满意度。收集并分析了定量和定性数据。
全省范围调查(n = 163)的结果显示,面对面和虚拟外科会诊患者的平均满意度评分没有显著差异(8.03对8.38,P = 0.26)。然而,大多数参与者表示,虚拟预约节省了他们的出行时间、精力和金钱,使他们减少了对他人的依赖,带来了显著的社会效益。在以社区为重点的样本(n = 71)中,38%的人表示如果没有虚拟就诊选项就不会进行该手术,21%的人表示会推迟手术。虚拟会诊平均为患者节省了9小时(范围1 - 90小时)。参与者进行手术的往返平均行程为427公里。
研究结果表明,术前和术后虚拟护理就诊的引入节省了就医成本和时间,有必要进一步投资虚拟护理。这将有助于促进农村居民公平获得医疗保健服务。