Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E3, Canada.
Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Edmonton, AB, T6H 3S5, Canada.
Planta. 2024 Mar 29;259(5):105. doi: 10.1007/s00425-024-04383-5.
Monoterpenes and phenolics play distinct roles in defending white spruce trees from insect defoliators. Monoterpenes contribute to the toxicity of the foliage, deterring herbivory, whereas phenolics impede budworm growth. This study demonstrates the complex interplay between monoterpenes and phenolics and their collective influence on the defense strategy of white spruce trees against a common insect defoliator. Long-lived coniferous trees display considerable variations in their defensive chemistry. The impact of these defense phenotype variations on insect herbivores of the same species remains to be thoroughly studied, mainly due to challenges in replicating the comprehensive defense profiles of trees under controlled conditions. This study methodically examined the defensive properties of foliar monoterpenes and phenolics across 80 distinct white spruce families. These families were subsequently grouped into two chemotypes based on their foliar monoterpene concentrations. To understand the separate and combined effects of these classes on tree defenses to the eastern spruce budworm, we conducted feeding experiments using actual defense profiles from representative families. Specifically, we assessed budworm response when exposed to substrates amended with phenolics alone or monoterpenes. Our findings indicate that the ratios and amounts of monoterpenes and phenolics present in the white spruce foliage influence the survival of spruce budworms. Phenotypes associated with complete larval mortality exhibited elevated ratios (ranging from 0.4 to 0.6) and concentrations (ranging from 1143 to 1796 ng mg) of monoterpenes. Conversely, families characterized by higher phenolic ratios (ranging from 0.62 to 0.77) and lower monoterpene concentrations (ranging from 419 to 985 ng mg) were less lethal to the spruce budworm. Both classes of defense compounds contribute significantly to the overall defensive capabilities of white spruce trees. Monoterpenes appear critical in determining the general toxicity of foliage, while phenolics play a role in slowing budworm development, thereby underscoring their collective importance in white spruce defenses.
单萜和酚类化合物在防御白松树上的昆虫食叶动物方面发挥着不同的作用。单萜化合物增加了树叶的毒性,阻止了食草动物的取食,而酚类化合物则阻碍了舞毒蛾的生长。这项研究表明了单萜和酚类化合物之间的复杂相互作用及其对白松抵御常见昆虫食叶动物的防御策略的综合影响。长寿命的针叶树在其防御化学物质方面表现出相当大的差异。这些防御表型变化对同一物种的昆虫食草动物的影响仍有待深入研究,主要是因为在控制条件下复制树木全面防御特征存在挑战。本研究系统地研究了 80 个不同白松家族的叶中单萜和酚类化合物的防御特性。根据叶中单萜浓度,这些家族随后分为两种化学型。为了了解这些类别的单独和组合效应对东部云杉芽虫对白松防御的影响,我们使用来自代表性家族的实际防御谱进行了喂养实验。具体来说,我们评估了当暴露于单独添加酚类化合物或单萜化合物的基质时,芽虫的反应。我们的研究结果表明,白松树叶中单萜和酚类化合物的比例和含量会影响云杉芽虫的存活率。与完全幼虫死亡相关的表型表现出升高的比例(范围为 0.4 至 0.6)和浓度(范围为 1143 至 1796ngmg)的单萜。相反,具有较高酚类比例(范围为 0.62 至 0.77)和较低单萜浓度(范围为 419 至 985ngmg)的家族对云杉芽虫的杀伤力较低。这两类防御化合物都对白松树木的整体防御能力做出了重要贡献。单萜在确定树叶的一般毒性方面似乎至关重要,而酚类化合物在减缓舞毒蛾发育方面发挥作用,因此突出了它们在白松防御中的共同重要性。