• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一般勤务警察在不服从嫌疑犯逮捕中的技术战术行为分析:一种确定最低武力需求的新方法。

Technical-tactical behavior analysis of general duty police officers during non-compliant suspect apprehensions: A novel approach to establish minimum force requirements.

机构信息

Human Performance Research and Development, Directorate of Fitness, Canadian Forces Morale and Welfare Services, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Royal Canadian Mounted Police, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Work. 2024;77(4):1341-1357. doi: 10.3233/WOR-230307.

DOI:10.3233/WOR-230307
PMID:38552129
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11091620/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

While effective apprehensions of non-compliant suspects are central to public safety, the minimal force needed to transition a suspect from standing to the ground, vital for apprehension success, has not been established.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the technical-tactical behaviors of general duty police officers during simulated apprehensions and quantify the minimum force required to destabilize non-compliant suspects.

METHODS

Task simulations conducted with 91 officers were analyzed to identify common grappling movements, strikes, control tactics, and changes in body posture. A separate assessment of 55 male officers aimed to determine the minimum force required for destabilization in five body regions (wrist, forearm, shoulder, mid-chest, and mid-back). Data are presented as mean±standard deviation.

RESULTS

On average, apprehensions took 7.3±3.2 seconds. While all officers used grappling movements (100%) and the majority employed control tactics (75%), strikes were seldom used (4%). Apprehensions typically began with a two-handed pull (97%; Contact Phase), 55% then attempted an arm bar takedown, followed by a two-handed cross-body pull (68%; Transition/Control Phase), and a two-handed push to the ground (19%; Ground Phase). All officers began in the upright posture, with most shifting to squat (75%), kneel (58%), or bent (45%) postures to complete the apprehension. The minimum force required to disrupt balance differed across body regions (wrist: 54±12 kg; forearm: 49±12 kg; shoulder: 42±10 kg; mid-chest: 44±11 kg; mid-back: 30±7 kg, all P < 0.05), except between the shoulder and chest (P = 0.19).

CONCLUSION

These findings provide insights that can enhance the design and accuracy of future apprehension evaluations and inform the optimization of law enforcement physical employment standards.

摘要

背景

虽然有效逮捕不遵守规定的嫌疑人对公共安全至关重要,但为了成功逮捕,将嫌疑人从站立状态过渡到地面所需的最小力量尚未确定。

目的

检查普通警察在模拟逮捕中的技术战术行为,并量化使不遵守规定的嫌疑人失去平衡所需的最小力量。

方法

对 91 名警察进行任务模拟分析,以确定常见的擒拿动作、击打、控制策略和身体姿势变化。对 55 名男性警察的单独评估旨在确定在五个身体部位(手腕、前臂、肩膀、中胸部和中背部)失稳所需的最小力量。数据以平均值±标准差表示。

结果

平均而言,逮捕需要 7.3±3.2 秒。虽然所有警察都使用擒拿动作(100%)并且大多数使用控制策略(75%),但很少使用击打(4%)。逮捕通常从双手拉(97%;接触阶段)开始,55%的人随后尝试手臂擒拿,接着是双手交叉体拉(68%;过渡/控制阶段),然后双手推到地面(19%;地面阶段)。所有警察都从直立姿势开始,大多数转换为深蹲(75%)、跪地(58%)或弯腰(45%)姿势完成逮捕。扰乱平衡所需的最小力量因身体部位而异(手腕:54±12kg;前臂:49±12kg;肩膀:42±10kg;中胸部:44±11kg;中背部:30±7kg,均 P<0.05),除了肩膀和胸部之间(P=0.19)。

结论

这些发现提供了可以增强未来逮捕评估设计和准确性的见解,并为优化执法人员身体使用标准提供了信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a672/11091620/59a73ebea543/wor-77-wor230307-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a672/11091620/e63a1816a06a/wor-77-wor230307-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a672/11091620/2415bad2ba46/wor-77-wor230307-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a672/11091620/a9386589757f/wor-77-wor230307-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a672/11091620/739588d17316/wor-77-wor230307-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a672/11091620/59a73ebea543/wor-77-wor230307-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a672/11091620/e63a1816a06a/wor-77-wor230307-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a672/11091620/2415bad2ba46/wor-77-wor230307-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a672/11091620/a9386589757f/wor-77-wor230307-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a672/11091620/739588d17316/wor-77-wor230307-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a672/11091620/59a73ebea543/wor-77-wor230307-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Technical-tactical behavior analysis of general duty police officers during non-compliant suspect apprehensions: A novel approach to establish minimum force requirements.一般勤务警察在不服从嫌疑犯逮捕中的技术战术行为分析:一种确定最低武力需求的新方法。
Work. 2024;77(4):1341-1357. doi: 10.3233/WOR-230307.
2
A Descriptive Analysis of Occupational Fatalities Due to Felonious Assault Among U.S. Law Enforcement Officers During Tactical Incidents, 1996-2014.1996 - 2014年美国执法人员在战术事件中因重罪袭击导致的职业死亡情况描述性分析
J Spec Oper Med. 2017 Fall;17(3):69-73. doi: 10.55460/AJYT-CIQA.
3
Non-fatal injuries among police officers during use-of-force encounters.警察在使用武力时遭遇的非致命性伤害。
Occup Med (Lond). 2023 Dec 29;73(8):479-483. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqad101.
4
Is muscular strength a critical physical attribute for the apprehension of a simulated non-compliant suspect?肌肉力量是否是抓捕模拟不配合嫌疑人的关键身体属性?
Ergonomics. 2021 Sep;64(9):1183-1190. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2021.1918769. Epub 2021 May 4.
5
Comparing levels of fitness of police Officers between two United States law enforcement agencies.比较美国两个执法机构中警察的体能水平。
Work. 2019;63(4):615-622. doi: 10.3233/WOR-192954.
6
Conductive electrical devices: a prospective, population-based study of the medical safety of law enforcement use.导电电子设备:一项基于人群的执法使用医疗安全性的前瞻性研究。
J Trauma. 2008 Jun;64(6):1567-72. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31817113b9.
7
Law enforcement duties and sudden cardiac death among police officers in United States: case distribution study.美国警察的执法职责与心源性猝死:病例分布研究。
BMJ. 2014 Nov 18;349:g6534. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g6534.
8
Tactical medical skill requirements for law enforcement officers: a 10-year analysis of line-of-duty deaths.执法人员的战术医疗技能要求:对 10 年因公殉职事件的分析。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2010 Jul-Aug;25(4):346-52. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00008323.
9
Effects of Mobile Computer Terminal Configuration and Level of Driving Control on Police Officers' Performance and Workload.移动计算机终端配置和驾驶控制水平对警察绩效和工作量的影响。
Hum Factors. 2021 Sep;63(6):1106-1120. doi: 10.1177/0018720820908362. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
10
Do baseline physical fitness measures predict law enforcement academy graduation?基础体能测量能否预测执法学院的毕业情况?
Work. 2022;72(1):263-269. doi: 10.3233/WOR-205310.

本文引用的文献

1
Identifying the Physical Fitness and Health Evaluations for Police Officers: Brief Systematic Review with an Emphasis on the Portuguese Research.确定警察体能与健康评估:重点关注葡萄牙研究的简要系统评价
Biology (Basel). 2022 Jul 15;11(7):1061. doi: 10.3390/biology11071061.
2
The physiological demand of a task simulation varies when developed by independent groups of experiential experts.当由不同的经验丰富的专家团队开发任务模拟时,其生理需求会有所不同。
Appl Ergon. 2022 Jul;102:103715. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103715. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
3
Is muscular strength a critical physical attribute for the apprehension of a simulated non-compliant suspect?
肌肉力量是否是抓捕模拟不配合嫌疑人的关键身体属性?
Ergonomics. 2021 Sep;64(9):1183-1190. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2021.1918769. Epub 2021 May 4.
4
Training for the job: evaluation of a self-defence training programme for correctional officers.工作培训:惩教官员自卫培训计划的评估。
Ergonomics. 2019 Dec;62(12):1585-1597. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2019.1677947. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
5
Characterization of the Physical Fitness of Police Officers: A Systematic Review.警察体能特征的描述:系统评价。
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Oct;33(10):2860-2874. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003177.
6
The effects of time frames on self-report.时间框架对自我报告的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 9;13(8):e0201655. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201655. eCollection 2018.
7
Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation.相关系数:合理使用与解释。
Anesth Analg. 2018 May;126(5):1763-1768. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864.
8
Validity and reliability of physical employment standards.体力劳动标准的有效性和可靠性。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016 Jun;41(6 Suppl 2):S83-91. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2015-0669.
9
Standard-setting methodology: Establishing performance standards and setting cut-scores to assist score interpretation.标准设定方法:建立绩效标准并设定分数线以辅助分数解读。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016 Jun;41(6 Suppl 2):S74-82. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2015-0522.
10
Towards best practice in physical and physiological employment standards.迈向身体和生理就业标准的最佳实践。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016 Jun;41(6 Suppl 2):S47-62. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2016-0003.