• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学生背负双肩包和拉杆箱时的肌肉活动比较。

Comparison of muscle activity in school students while carrying backpacks and trolley bags.

机构信息

Lee Shau Kee School of Business and Administration, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Hong Kong SAR.

Department of Health & Physical Education, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.

出版信息

Work. 2024;79(2):683-694. doi: 10.3233/WOR-230628.

DOI:10.3233/WOR-230628
PMID:38552131
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Trolley bags have gained popularity among students, but there is limited research comparing them to backpack-style school bags.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare how carrying a backpack versus a trolley bag affects the activity of trunk and lower limb muscles in secondary school students.

METHODS

Electromyographic activity was measured in 25 students (13.4±1.1 years) as they walked on level ground and up/down stairs while carrying both types of bags. The activity of the gastrocnemius, tibialis anterior, semitendinosus, rectus femoris, lumbar erector spinae, and rectus abdominis muscles was assessed on both the dominant and non-dominant sides.

RESULTS

The study found significantly reduced muscle activation in most of the targeted muscles when walking on level ground with the trolley bag and when going up/down stairs with the backpack.

CONCLUSIONS

Lifting a trolley bag depends on the slope of the walking surface and is more efficient on level ground, while carrying a backpack is more efficient when going up and down stairs. Since it is not practical to switch bags when encountering stairs in schools, a bag with a mixed model design incorporating features of both trolley and backpack may be more beneficial and practical for students to use. Students, parents, and teachers should be aware of the injury risks associated with carrying different types of bags.

摘要

背景

手推车书包在学生中越来越受欢迎,但将其与背包式书包进行比较的研究有限。

目的

本研究旨在比较背背包和手推车书包对中学生躯干和下肢肌肉活动的影响。

方法

本研究对 25 名学生(13.4±1.1 岁)进行了肌电图测量,这些学生在平地和上下楼梯时分别携带这两种书包行走。在优势侧和非优势侧评估了小腿三头肌、胫骨前肌、半腱肌、股四头肌、腰椎竖脊肌和腹直肌的活动。

结果

研究发现,在手推车上平地行走和背背包上下楼梯时,大多数目标肌肉的肌肉激活明显减少。

结论

提起手推车书包取决于行走表面的坡度,在平地更有效,而背背包上下楼梯更有效。由于在学校遇到楼梯时不可能更换书包,因此对于学生来说,使用具有混合模型设计、结合手推车和背包特点的书包可能更有益和实用。学生、家长和教师应该意识到携带不同类型书包的相关受伤风险。

相似文献

1
Comparison of muscle activity in school students while carrying backpacks and trolley bags.学生背负双肩包和拉杆箱时的肌肉活动比较。
Work. 2024;79(2):683-694. doi: 10.3233/WOR-230628.
2
Children require less gait kinematic adaptations to pull a trolley than to carry a backpack.与背背包相比,儿童拉着手推车时所需的步态运动学适应性更小。
Gait Posture. 2017 Feb;52:189-193. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.11.041. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
3
Trunk muscle activity in different modes of carrying schoolbags.不同背书包方式下的躯干肌肉活动。
Ergonomics. 2006 Feb 10;49(2):127-38. doi: 10.1080/00140130500435066.
4
Effects of backpack load on critical changes of trunk muscle activation and lumbar spine loading during walking.背包负荷对行走过程中躯干肌肉激活和腰椎负荷关键变化的影响。
Ergonomics. 2018 Apr;61(4):553-565. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2017.1365950. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
5
Comparison of four different backpacks intended for school use.四种不同的学生用背包的比较。
Appl Ergon. 2003 May;34(3):257-64. doi: 10.1016/S0003-6870(03)00034-6.
6
A kinematic comparison of gait with a backpack versus a trolley for load carriage in children.儿童背负背包与行李车行走时的运动学比较。
Appl Ergon. 2019 Oct;80:28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.05.003. Epub 2019 May 14.
7
Gait asymmetry and rating of perceived exertion: How are they influenced by carrying a backpack and pulling a trolley?步态不对称与自觉用力程度评级:背负背包和拉着手推车对它们有何影响?
Work. 2019;63(2):253-259. doi: 10.3233/WOR-192926.
8
The muscle activation patterns of lower limb during stair climbing at different backpack load.不同背包负荷下爬楼梯时下肢的肌肉激活模式。
Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2015;17(4):13-20.
9
The effect of unilateral hockey bag carriage on the muscle activities of the trunk and lower limb of young healthy males during gait.单侧曲棍球包携带对年轻健康男性行走时躯干和下肢肌肉活动的影响。
Res Sports Med. 2014;22(1):23-35. doi: 10.1080/15438627.2013.852094.
10
Interaction of body mass index and age in muscular activities among backpack carrying male schoolchildren.背负书包的男学生肌肉活动中体重指数与年龄的相互作用
Work. 2015;52(3):677-86. doi: 10.3233/WOR-152102.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of backpack load during walking: an EMG and biomechanical analysis.行走时背包负荷的影响:肌电图和生物力学分析
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2025 May;63(5):1427-1433. doi: 10.1007/s11517-024-03280-z. Epub 2025 Jan 11.