Department of Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa 56126, Italy.
Department of Psychology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403, USA; J. P. Scott Center for Neuroscience, Mind and Behavior, Bowling Green, OH 43403, USA.
Behav Brain Res. 2024 May 8;465:114971. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2024.114971. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
Within their familiar areas homing pigeons rely on familiar visual landscape features and landmarks for homing. However, the neural basis of visual landmark-based navigation has been so far investigated mainly in relation to the role of the hippocampal formation. The avian visual Wulst is the telencephalic projection field of the thalamofugal pathway that has been suggested to be involved in processing lateral visual inputs that originate from the far visual field. The Wulst is therefore a good candidate for a neural structure participating in the visual control of familiar visual landmark-based navigation. We repeatedly released and tracked Wulst-lesioned and control homing pigeons from three sites about 10-15 km from the loft. Wulst lesions did not impair the ability of the pigeons to orient homeward during the first release from each of the three sites nor to localise the loft within the home area. In addition, Wulst-lesioned pigeons displayed unimpaired route fidelity acquisition to a repeated homing path compared to the intact birds. However, compared to control birds, Wulst-lesioned pigeons displayed persistent oscillatory flight patterns across releases, diminished attention to linear (leading lines) landscape features, such as roads and wood edges, and less direct flight paths within the home area. Differences and similarities between the effects of Wulst and hippocampal lesions suggest that although the visual Wulst does not seem to play a direct role in the memory representation of a landscape-landmark map, it does seem to participate in influencing the perceptual construction of such a map.
在熟悉的区域内,家鸽依靠熟悉的视觉景观特征和地标来归巢。然而,到目前为止,基于视觉地标导航的神经基础主要是在海马结构的作用方面进行了研究。鸟类的视觉脑叶是丘脑传出通路的端脑投射区,有人认为它参与了处理来自远视野的侧方视觉输入的过程。因此,脑叶是参与基于熟悉视觉地标导航的视觉控制的神经结构的良好候选者。我们从鸽舍大约 10-15 公里的三个地点重复释放和跟踪脑叶损伤和对照家鸽。脑叶损伤并没有损害鸽子从三个地点中的每一个第一次释放时回家的能力,也没有损害它们在归巢区内定位鸽舍的能力。此外,与完整鸟类相比,脑叶损伤的鸽子在重复归巢路径的路线保真度获取方面表现出不受影响。然而,与对照鸟类相比,脑叶损伤的鸽子在整个释放过程中表现出持续的振荡飞行模式,对线性(引导线)景观特征(如道路和树林边缘)的注意力减少,在归巢区的飞行路径也不那么直接。脑叶和海马损伤的影响之间的差异和相似之处表明,尽管视觉脑叶似乎没有在景观地标地图的记忆表示中发挥直接作用,但它似乎参与了影响这种地图的感知构建。