CogNAC Research Group (Cognition, Neurosciences, Affect et Comportement), Québec, Canada; Département de Psychologie, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Québec, Canada.
CogNAC Research Group (Cognition, Neurosciences, Affect et Comportement), Québec, Canada; Département de Psychologie, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Québec, Canada.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2024 May;199:112338. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2024.112338. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
Interference by distractors has been associated multiple times with diminished visual and auditory working memory (WM) performance. Negative emotional distractors in particular lead to detrimental effects on WM. However, these associations have only been seen when distractors and items to maintain in WM are from the same sensory modality. In this study, we investigate cross-modal interference on WM. We invited 20 participants to complete a visual change-detection task, assessing visual WM (VWM), while hearing emotional (fearful) and neutral auditory distractors. Electrophysiological activity was recorded to measure contralateral delay activity (CDA) and auditory P2 event-related potentials (ERP), indexing WM maintenance and distractor salience respectively. At the behavioral level, fearful prosody didn't decrease significantly working memory accuracy, compared to neutral prosody. Regarding ERPs, fearful distractors evoked a greater P2 amplitude than neutral distractors. Correlations between the two ERP potentials indicated that P2 amplitude difference between the two types of prosody was associated with the difference in CDA amplitude for fearful and neutral trials. This association suggests that cognitive resources required to process fearful prosody detrimentally impact VWM maintenance. That result provides a piece of additional evidence that negative emotional stimuli produce greater interference than neutral stimuli and that the cognitive resources used to process stimuli from different modalities come from a common pool.
干扰物的干扰多次与视觉和听觉工作记忆 (WM) 表现的下降有关。特别是负性情绪干扰物会对 WM 产生不利影响。然而,只有当干扰物和要在 WM 中保持的项目来自同一感觉模态时,才会出现这些关联。在这项研究中,我们研究了 WM 的跨模态干扰。我们邀请了 20 名参与者完成视觉变化检测任务,评估视觉 WM (VWM),同时听到情绪 (恐惧) 和中性听觉干扰物。记录了脑电活动以测量对侧延迟活动 (CDA) 和听觉 P2 事件相关电位 (ERP),分别标记 WM 维持和干扰物的突显度。在行为水平上,与中性韵律相比,恐惧韵律并没有显著降低工作记忆准确性。关于 ERP,恐惧的干扰物比中性的干扰物诱发了更大的 P2 振幅。两种 ERP 电位之间的相关性表明,两种韵律之间 P2 振幅的差异与恐惧和中性试验的 CDA 振幅差异有关。这种关联表明,处理恐惧韵律所需的认知资源会对 VWM 维持产生不利影响。该结果提供了额外的证据,表明负性情绪刺激比中性刺激产生更大的干扰,并且用于处理来自不同模态的刺激的认知资源来自一个共同的资源池。