Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA.
Division of Chronic Pain, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Pain Pract. 2024 Sep;24(7):895-903. doi: 10.1111/papr.13373. Epub 2024 Mar 30.
The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) approved the first pain medicine fellowship programs over three decades ago, designed around a pharmacological philosophy. Following that, there has been a rise in the transition of pain medicine education toward a multidisciplinary interventional model based on a tremendous surge of contemporaneous literature in these areas. This trend has created variability in clinical experience and education amongst accredited pain medicine programs with minimal literature evaluating the differences and commonalities in education and experience of different pain medicine fellowships through Program Director (PD) experiences. This study aims to gather insight from pain medicine fellowship program directors across the country to assess clinical and interventional training, providing valuable perspectives on the future of pain medicine education.
This study involved 56 PDs of ACGME-accredited pain fellowship programs in the United States. The recruitment process included three phases: advanced notification, invitation, and follow-up to maximize response rate. Participants completed a standard online questionnaire, covering various topics such as subcategory fields, online platforms for supplemental education, clinical experience, postgraduate practice success, and training adequacy.
Surveys were completed by 39/56 (69%) standing members of the Association of Pain Program Directors (APPD). All PDs allowed fellows to participate in industry-related and professional society-related procedural workshops, with 59% encouraging these workshops. PDs emphasized the importance of integrity, professionalism, and diligence for long-term success. Fifty-four percent of PDs expressed the need for extension of fellowship training to avoid supplemental education by industry or pain/spine societies.
This study highlights the challenge of providing adequate training in all Pain Medicine subtopics within a 12-month pain medicine fellowship. PDs suggest the need for additional training for fellows and discuss the importance of curriculum standardization.
三十多年前,美国毕业后医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)批准了第一批疼痛医学研究员课程,这些课程围绕药理学理念设计。此后,随着这些领域的大量同期文献的涌现,疼痛医学教育向多学科介入模式的转变趋势越来越明显。这种趋势导致在经过认证的疼痛医学项目中,临床经验和教育存在差异,而评估不同疼痛医学研究员课程在教育和经验方面的差异和共性的文献却很少,项目主任(PD)的经验在其中起到了关键作用。本研究旨在从全国范围内的疼痛医学研究员课程主任那里收集见解,评估临床和介入培训,为疼痛医学教育的未来提供有价值的观点。
这项研究涉及美国的 56 个 ACGME 认证的疼痛研究员课程的主任。招募过程包括三个阶段:提前通知、邀请和跟进,以最大限度地提高回复率。参与者完成了一份标准的在线问卷,涵盖了各种主题,如子类别领域、补充教育的在线平台、临床经验、毕业后实践成功和培训充足性。
在协会疼痛项目主任(APPD)的 39 名(69%)常任成员中完成了调查。所有主任都允许研究员参加与行业相关和专业协会相关的程序研讨会,其中 59%的主任鼓励参加这些研讨会。主任们强调了正直、专业精神和勤奋对于长期成功的重要性。54%的主任表示需要延长研究员培训,以避免行业或疼痛/脊柱协会提供补充教育。
这项研究强调了在为期 12 个月的疼痛医学研究员课程中提供所有疼痛医学子主题的充足培训的挑战。主任们建议研究员需要额外的培训,并讨论了课程标准化的重要性。