Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Jul-Aug;23(4):551-559. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2018.1544327. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
There is a minimal amount of published data regarding to Emergency Medical Services (EMS) fellowship programs. The purpose of this study was to obtain program characteristics and diversity data regarding EMS fellowship programs. A survey was sent to program directors at all EMS fellowship programs accredited by the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). Data collected included: year program started, year program accredited, unfilled fellow positions, number of EMS faculty, gender, and race/ethnicity. Gender and race/ethnicity data from EMS fellowships were compared to emergency medicine (EM) residencies using data from the American Association of Medical Colleges. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS with descriptive statistics, and Chi-square tests. The response rate for the survey was 88% (45/51) of all EMS fellowship programs that were accredited at the time of this survey. Most programs (71%) offer a one-year EMS fellowship, with the remaining offering an optional second year. The median number of physician response vehicles per program was 1.0 (IQR 0.0-2.0), with 24% (11/45) not having a dedicated physician response vehicle. This survey identified that 118 EMS fellows have graduated since inception of the accreditation process, while 34 positions went unfilled. The median number of EMS fellow positions per program was 2.0 (IQR 1.0-2.0), with a range of 1 to 4. It was noted that 31% of programs had no female EMS faculty, and 48% of programs had no under-represented minority EMS faculty. There was a significantly larger proportion of female faculty in EM residency programs (30.5%; 949/3,107) compared to EMS fellowships (19%; 53/274), OR = 1.8, 95% CI:1.3-2.5, p < 0.0001. There was a significantly larger proportion of female fellows in EMS (56%; 66/118) vs. female residents in EM (38%; 2,193/5,777), OR" = 2.1, 95% CI:1.4-3.0, p < 0.0001. There was a significantly larger proportion of under-represented minority faculty in EM residency programs (19.7%; 786/3,978) vs. EMS fellowships (12.0%, 33/274), OR = 1.8, 95% CI:1.2-2.6, p < 0.002. A significant number of EMS fellowship positions have remained unfilled since implementation of an accreditation process for EMS fellowships. The percentage of females and under-represented minority faculty in EMS programs was much lower than for EM residency programs.
关于急诊医疗服务 (EMS) 研究员课程,发表的数据很少。本研究的目的是获取关于 EMS 研究员课程的课程特征和多样性数据。向所有经研究生医学教育认证委员会 (ACGME) 认证的 EMS 研究员课程的课程主任发送了一份调查。收集的数据包括:课程开始年份、课程获得认证年份、未填补的研究员职位、EMS 教师人数、性别和种族/民族。使用美国医学院协会的数据,将 EMS 研究员的性别和种族/民族数据与急诊医学 (EM) 住院医师进行了比较。使用 IBM SPSS 进行数据分析,包括描述性统计和卡方检验。调查时,所有经认证的 EMS 研究员课程的回复率为 88%(45/51)。大多数课程(71%)提供为期一年的 EMS 研究员课程,其余课程提供可选的第二年课程。每个课程的医师反应车辆中位数为 1.0(IQR 0.0-2.0),24%(11/45)没有专用的医师反应车辆。这项调查确定,自认证程序开始以来,已有 118 名 EMS 研究员毕业,而 34 个职位空缺。每个课程的 EMS 研究员职位中位数为 2.0(IQR 1.0-2.0),范围为 1 至 4。请注意,31%的课程没有女性 EMS 教师,48%的课程没有代表性不足的少数族裔 EMS 教师。EM 住院医师课程中的女性教师比例明显更高(30.5%;949/3,107),而 EMS 研究员课程中的女性教师比例(19%;53/274),OR=1.8,95%CI:1.3-2.5,p<0.0001。EMS 中的女性研究员比例明显更高(56%;66/118),而 EM 中的女性住院医师(38%;2,193/5,777),OR"=2.1,95%CI:1.4-3.0,p<0.0001。EM 住院医师课程中代表性不足的少数族裔教师比例明显更高(19.7%;786/3,978),而 EMS 研究员课程中的代表性不足的少数族裔教师比例(12.0%;33/274),OR=1.8,95%CI:1.2-2.6,p<0.002。自 EMS 研究员课程认证程序实施以来,大量 EMS 研究员职位空缺。EMS 课程中的女性和代表性不足的少数族裔教师的比例远低于 EM 住院医师课程。