Instituto de Investigación Interdisciplinaria, Universidad de Talca, 3460000 Talca, Chile.
Departamento de Tecnología de Alimentos, Nutrición y Bromatología, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain.
Food Chem. 2024 Aug 1;448:139055. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.139055. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
Due to allergenic concerns, only pea, potato, and wheat proteins have been approved as alternatives for replacing animal-based fining agents in wines. In pursuit of other substitutes, this work aimed to determine the fining ability of amaranth (Amaranthus caudatus L.) proteins (AP) in red wine, compared to quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) (QP) and a commercial pea protein. Phenolic and volatile composition, as well as color characteristics, were analyzed. AP was as effective as QP at decreasing condensed tannins, with AP at 50 g/hL being the most effective treatment (25.6% reduction). QP and AP produced a minor or no statistical change in the total anthocyanins and wine color intensity. They reduced the total ester concentration, but the total alcohols remained unchanged. The outcomes of AP and QP were similar, and sometimes better than the pea proteins, thus suggesting that they could be promising options for the development of novel fining agents.
由于过敏问题,只有豌豆、土豆和小麦蛋白被批准作为替代动物澄清剂用于葡萄酒中。为了寻找其他替代品,本研究旨在比较苋(Amaranthus caudatus L.)蛋白(AP)、藜麦(Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)(QP)和一种商业豌豆蛋白对红葡萄酒的澄清能力。分析了酚类和挥发性成分以及颜色特征。AP 与 QP 一样能有效降低单宁,在 50 g/hL 的浓度下,AP 的处理效果最佳(降低了 25.6%)。QP 和 AP 对总花色苷和葡萄酒颜色强度几乎没有或没有统计学上的变化。它们降低了总酯浓度,但总醇含量保持不变。AP 和 QP 的效果相似,有时甚至优于豌豆蛋白,因此表明它们可能是开发新型澄清剂的有前途的选择。