IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna; Istituto "L. e A. Seràgnoli", Bologna, Italy.
EBMT ALWP Statistical Unit, Paris, France.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2024 Jul;59(7):983-990. doi: 10.1038/s41409-024-02275-6. Epub 2024 Mar 30.
Older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) refractory to initial or reinduction chemotherapy have a dismal prognosis if they do not undergo hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HCT). However, data assessing HCT outcomes from different donors are scarce. We evaluated results from a retrospective analysis on patients aged ≥70 years, with AML not in remission who received an allogeneic HCT from HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD), HLA-10/10 matched unrelated donor (MUD), or T-cell replete haploidentical (Haplo) donor, from 2010 to 2021, reported to the ALWP-EBMT database. A total of 360 patients (median age 72 years, range 70-79) were included in the analysis. Median follow-up for the entire population was 35.5 months. Donors were MSD (n = 58), 10/10 HLA-MUD (n = 228), and Haplo (n = 74). A total of 213 (59.2%) patients were primary induction failures, while 147 (40.8%) were in first or subsequent relapse. Graft source was peripheral blood in 92% of the patients. Patients transplanted from Haplo donors more frequently received marrow grafts (p < 0.01) and presented the combination female donor to male recipient (p < 0.01). The overall 2-year rates of overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) were: 62.4% (95% CI 47.2-74.3) and 47.6% (95% CI 33.1-60.8) for MSD, 43% (95% CI 35.8-49.9), and 37.5% (95% CI 30.7-44.4) for MUD, and 25.9% (95% CI 15.8-37.2), and 26.5% (95% CI 16.3-37.8) for recipients of Haplo transplants. The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (RI) was slightly lower for Haplo recipients at 29.6% (95% CI 19-40.9), for MUD it was 30.2% (95% CI 23.9-36.7), and for MSD 34.9% (95% CI 22-48.2); counterbalanced by a higher incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) of 43.9% (95% CI 31.6-55.6) for Haplo recipients, 32.2% (95% CI 26-33.1) for MUD and 17.5% (95% CI 8.4-29.3) for MSD. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 35.3% (95% CI 22.3-48.5) for MSD, 29.6% (95% CI 23.2-36.2) for MUD, and 19.2% (95% CI 10.7-29.6) for Haplo patients. In the multivariate model, compared to the referent group of MSD recipients, the risk of NRM was higher among patients transplanted from Haplo donors ([hazard ratio] HR 5.1, 95% CI 2.23-11.61, p < 0.001) and MUD (HR 3.21, 95% CI 1.48-0.6.94, p = 0.003). Furthermore, both Haplo and MUD were associated with inferior OS, (HR 3.6, 95% CI 1.98-0.6.56, p < 0.001, and HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.37-0.3.88, p = 0.002, respectively), and LFS (HR 2.24, 95% CI 1.31-0.3.84, p = 0.003, and HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.04-0.2.60, p = 0.034, respectively). Patients transplanted from Haplo donors were also associated with worse GFRS (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.07-2.77, p:0.025) compared with MSD patients. Older adult AML patients with active disease transplanted from MSD experienced prolonged OS and LFS compared to 10/10 MUD and Haplo due to lower NRM. Prospective clinical trials are warranted.
对于初始或再诱导化疗无效的老年急性髓系白血病 (AML) 患者,如果不进行造血干细胞移植 (HCT),预后极差。然而,评估来自不同供体的 HCT 结果的数据却很少。我们评估了 2010 年至 2021 年期间,来自 HLA 匹配的同胞供体 (MSD)、HLA-10/10 匹配的无关供体 (MUD) 或 T 细胞丰富的单倍体 (Haplo) 供体的年龄≥70 岁、AML 未缓解的患者的回顾性分析结果,这些结果报告给了 ALWP-EBMT 数据库。共有 360 名患者(中位年龄 72 岁,范围 70-79)被纳入分析。整个人群的中位随访时间为 35.5 个月。供体为 MSD(n=58)、10/10 HLA-MUD(n=228)和 Haplo(n=74)。213 名(59.2%)患者为原发性诱导失败,147 名(40.8%)为首次或随后复发。92%的患者接受外周血移植,Haplo 供体移植的患者更常接受骨髓移植(p<0.01),且供受者组合为女性供体至男性受体(p<0.01)。MSD、MUD 和 Haplo 移植患者的总 2 年总生存率(OS)和无白血病生存率(LFS)分别为:62.4%(95%CI 47.2-74.3)和 47.6%(95%CI 33.1-60.8)、43%(95%CI 35.8-49.9)和 37.5%(95%CI 30.7-44.4)、25.9%(95%CI 15.8-37.2)和 26.5%(95%CI 16.3-37.8)。Haplo 移植患者的 2 年累积复发率(RI)略低,为 29.6%(95%CI 19-40.9),MUD 为 30.2%(95%CI 23.9-36.7),MSD 为 34.9%(95%CI 22-48.2);但非复发死亡率(NRM)较高,Haplo 移植患者为 43.9%(95%CI 31.6-55.6),MUD 为 32.2%(95%CI 26-33.1),MSD 为 17.5%(95%CI 8.4-29.3)。无移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)-无复发生存(GRFS)为:MSD 患者为 35.3%(95%CI 22.3-48.5)、MUD 为 29.6%(95%CI 23.2-36.2)、Haplo 患者为 19.2%(95%CI 10.7-29.6)。在多变量模型中,与 MSD 患者相比,Haplo 和 MUD 供体移植患者的 NRM 风险更高(HR 5.1,95%CI 2.23-11.61,p<0.001 和 HR 3.21,95%CI 1.48-0.69,p=0.003)。此外,Haplo 和 MUD 均与 OS 降低相关(HR 3.6,95%CI 1.98-0.65,p<0.001 和 HR 2.3,95%CI 1.37-0.38,p=0.002),LFS 降低(HR 2.24,95%CI 1.31-0.38,p=0.003 和 HR 1.64,95%CI 1.04-0.26,p=0.034)。与 MSD 患者相比,Haplo 供体移植患者的 GFRS 也较差(HR 1.72,95%CI 1.07-2.77,p:0.025)。与 10/10 MUD 和 Haplo 相比,接受 MSD 供体的老年 AML 患者在患有活动性疾病时,由于 NRM 较低,OS 和 LFS 延长。需要进行前瞻性临床试验。