Suppr超能文献

双份无关脐血与 HLA 单倍体相合骨髓移植:BMT CTN 1101 试验。

Double unrelated umbilical cord blood vs HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation: the BMT CTN 1101 trial.

机构信息

Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.

Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Blood. 2021 Jan 21;137(3):420-428. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020007535.

Abstract

Results of 2 parallel phase 2 trials of transplantation of unrelated umbilical cord blood (UCB) or bone marrow (BM) from HLA-haploidentical relatives provided equipoise for direct comparison of these donor sources. Between June 2012 and June 2018, 368 patients aged 18 to 70 years with chemotherapy-sensitive lymphoma or acute leukemia in remission were randomly assigned to undergo UCB (n = 186) or haploidentical (n = 182) transplant. Reduced-intensity conditioning comprised total-body irradiation with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine for both donor types. Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis for UCB transplantation was cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and for haploidentical transplantation, posttransplant cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus, and MMF. The primary end point was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS). Treatment groups had similar age, sex, self-reported ethnic origin, performance status, disease, and disease status at randomization. Two-year PFS was 35% (95% confidence interval [CI], 28% to 42%) compared with 41% (95% CI, 34% to 48%) after UCB and haploidentical transplants, respectively (P = .41). Prespecified analysis of secondary end points recorded higher 2-year nonrelapse mortality after UCB, 18% (95% CI, 13% to 24%), compared with haploidentical transplantation, 11% (95% CI, 6% to 16%), P = .04. This led to lower 2-year overall survival (OS) after UCB compared with haploidentical transplantation, 46% (95% CI, 38-53) and 57% (95% CI 49% to 64%), respectively (P = .04). The trial did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in the primary end point, 2-year PFS, between the donor sources. Although both donor sources extend access to reduced-intensity transplantation, analyses of secondary end points, including OS, favor haploidentical BM donors. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01597778.

摘要

两项无关供者脐带血(UCB)或亲缘单倍体相合骨髓(BM)移植的平行Ⅱ期临床试验结果为直接比较这两种供者来源提供了均衡性。2012 年 6 月至 2018 年 6 月,368 例年龄 18 至 70 岁、有化疗敏感淋巴瘤或缓解后急性白血病的患者被随机分配接受 UCB(n = 186)或单倍体相合(n = 182)移植。两种供者来源的强化预处理方案均包括全身照射联合环磷酰胺和氟达拉滨。UCB 移植的移植物抗宿主病预防方案为环孢素和霉酚酸酯(MMF),单倍体相合移植为环磷酰胺、他克莫司和 MMF。主要终点为 2 年无进展生存(PFS)。治疗组在年龄、性别、自我报告的种族、表现状态、疾病和随机分组时的疾病状态方面具有相似性。UCB 和单倍体相合移植的 2 年 PFS 分别为 35%(95%CI,28%至 42%)和 41%(95%CI,34%至 48%)(P =.41)。对次要终点的预设分析显示,UCB 组的 2 年非复发死亡率较高,为 18%(95%CI,13%至 24%),而单倍体相合移植组为 11%(95%CI,6%至 16%),P =.04。这导致 UCB 组的 2 年总生存(OS)低于单倍体相合移植组,分别为 46%(95%CI,38%至 53%)和 57%(95%CI,49%至 64%)(P =.04)。该试验未显示供者来源之间主要终点,即 2 年 PFS 有统计学意义的差异。尽管两种供者来源都扩大了接受减强度移植的机会,但包括 OS 在内的次要终点分析结果更倾向于单倍体相合 BM 供者。该试验在 www.clinicaltrials.gov 上注册,编号为 #NCT01597778。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39ce/7819761/54aaa1d80c42/bloodBLD2020007535absf1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验