Järvinen S
Am J Orthod. 1985 Feb;87(2):144-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(85)90024-7.
The variation of the ANB angle was studied in a sample which consisted of 138 orthodontically untreated children 7 to 15 years of age with Class I, Class II, or Class III (Angle) malocclusion. A regression analysis was used in order to describe the proportion of the distorting variation caused by some usual changes in the cranial and facial skeleton. The results revealed that a part of the variation of the ANB angle could be attributed to factors other than the actual apical base difference, among these factors being the rotation of the S-N plane, the relative length of the S-N plane, and the rotation of the jaws. Because the ANB angle can vary without any marked abnormalities in the sagittal jaw relationship, the use of the so-called normal limits for the ANB angle is not justified. It would be better to replace the ANB angle with a more accurate indicator.
在一个由138名7至15岁未经正畸治疗、患有安氏I类、II类或III类错牙合畸形的儿童组成的样本中,对ANB角的变化进行了研究。为了描述由颅面骨骼的一些常见变化引起的扭曲变化比例,采用了回归分析。结果显示,ANB角变化的一部分可归因于实际根尖基骨差异以外的因素,这些因素包括S-N平面的旋转、S-N平面的相对长度以及颌骨的旋转。由于ANB角在矢状颌关系无明显异常的情况下也会变化,因此使用所谓的ANB角正常范围是不合理的。用一个更准确的指标取代ANB角会更好。