Prediction of histopathologic grades of bladder cancer with radiomics based on MRI: Comparison with traditional MRI.

PURPOSE

To compare biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bp-MRI) radiomics signatures and traditional MRI model for the preoperative prediction of bladder cancer (BCa) grade.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 255 consecutive patients with pathologically confirmed 113 low-grade and 142 high-grade BCa. The traditional MRI nomogram model was developed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression by the mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), vesical imaging reporting and data system, tumor size, and the number of tumors. Volumes of interest were manually drawn on T-weighted imaging (TWI) and ADC maps by 2 radiologists. Using one-way analysis of variance, correlation, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator methods to select features. Then, a logistic regression classifier was used to develop the radiomics signatures. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to compare the diagnostic abilities of the radiomics and traditional MRI models by the DeLong test. Finally, decision curve analysis was performed by estimating the clinical usefulness of the 2 models.

RESULTS

The area under the ROC curves (AUCs) of the traditional MRI model were 0.841 in the training cohort and 0.806 in the validation cohort. The AUCs of the 3 groups of radiomics model [ADC, TWI, bp-MRI (ADC and TWI)] were 0.888, 0.875, and 0.899 in the training cohort and 0.863, 0.805, and 0.867 in the validation cohort, respectively. The combined radiomics model achieved higher AUCs than the traditional MRI model. decision curve analysis indicated that the radiomics model had higher net benefits than the traditional MRI model.

CONCLUSION

The bp-MRI radiomics model may help distinguish high-grade and low-grade BCa and outperforming the traditional MRI model. Multicenter validation is needed to acquire high-level evidence for its clinical application.