Comparison of the accuracy of different types of bite recordings - an in vitro study.

OBJECTIVES

Reconstruction of a three-dimensional jaw position determined by a bite recording is an important aspect of prosthetic therapy. Different materials are used for this purpose. In the dental technical workflow, recordings are used to mount a lower jaw cast in a patient-like spatial position relative to the upper jaw cast. We evaluated the accuracy of positioning under the influence of different jaw positions and materials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In an experimental setup, comprising an articulator, a pair of metal casts, and an optoelectronic measurement system, the spatial position of the incisal point and two condylar points were measured. To evaluate the accuracy of repeated repositioning of casts in the technical workflow, 324 measurements were taken from 108 recordings, consisting of silicone bite-stops made of addition curing silicone with 95 shore hardness, acrylic wafers, and wax recordings. The recordings were obtained in four jaw relations differing in vertical and protrusive components.

RESULTS

Of the three materials/material combinations examined, silicone showed the most consistent results across all measurements, followed by the acrylic wafer system, and then wax recordings. Generally, recordings with smaller gaps between the jaws and no protrusive components showed greater deviations compared to jaw positions with greater protrusion and higher vertical dimensions.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

To achieve reliable model mounting with high accuracy, recordings should include the use of a frontal jig and four small recording platelets made of silicone, especially if only a slight elevation of the vertical dimension is needed.