Zaman Tahir, Ahmed Attari Muhammad Bilal, Ahmad Adeel, Butt Muhammad Ahsan, Fayyaz Khurram, Zubair Syeda Aeman
Department of Medicine, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, PAK.
Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Chelsea, GBR.
Cureus. 2024 Feb 29;16(2):e55251. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55251. eCollection 2024 Feb.
Background In cirrhotic patients with ascites, primary prevention of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a key strategy to lower morbidity and death. Rifaximin and fluoroquinolone used alternately as main prophylaxis are as effective as reported. This study aimed to compare the frequency of occurrence of SBP in patients with decompensated chronic liver disease treated with rifaximin alone and in combination with fluoroquinolone. Methodology A total of 76 patients with hepatitis C virus-related decompensated chronic liver disease and ascites were divided into two groups based on matching age, sex, and Child-Pugh class. Group A (38 patients) received rifaximin 1,100 mg/day in two divided doses with daily fluoroquinolone 400 mg/day, whereas group B (38 patients) received rifaximin 1,100 mg/day alone as a two dosage. The patients were monitored for up to three months. The study's endpoints were SBP, hepatocellular carcinoma, compliance failure, death, or liver transplantation. Results In this comparative study involving 76 patients, the demographic and clinical characteristics were assessed across two treatment groups: rifaximin alone (n = 38) and rifaximin with fluoroquinolone (n = 38). The combination therapy demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in SBP compared to rifaximin alone. Additionally, the overall survival rate was higher in the combination group. These findings suggest potential benefits of the combined approach in managing hepatic encephalopathy-related complications. Conclusions When compared to rifaximin alone for primary SBP prophylaxis, the combination of rifaximin with fluoroquinolone exhibited greater effectiveness with the same safety profile.
背景 在肝硬化腹水患者中,自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)的一级预防是降低发病率和死亡率的关键策略。交替使用利福昔明和氟喹诺酮作为主要预防措施的效果与报道的一致。本研究旨在比较单独使用利福昔明以及联合使用氟喹诺酮治疗失代偿期慢性肝病患者时SBP的发生率。
方法 总共76例丙型肝炎病毒相关失代偿期慢性肝病且伴有腹水的患者,根据年龄、性别和Child-Pugh分级进行匹配后分为两组。A组(38例患者)接受利福昔明1100mg/天,分两次服用,同时每日服用氟喹诺酮400mg;而B组(38例患者)仅接受利福昔明1100mg/天,分两次服用。对患者进行长达三个月的监测。研究终点为SBP、肝细胞癌、依从性失败、死亡或肝移植。
结果 在这项涉及76例患者的比较研究中,对两个治疗组(单独使用利福昔明组,n = 38;利福昔明联合氟喹诺酮组,n = 38)的人口统计学和临床特征进行了评估。与单独使用利福昔明相比,联合治疗在SBP方面显示出统计学上的显著降低。此外,联合组的总生存率更高。这些发现表明联合治疗方法在管理肝性脑病相关并发症方面具有潜在益处。
结论 与单独使用利福昔明进行原发性SBP预防相比,利福昔明与氟喹诺酮联合使用在安全性相同的情况下表现出更高的有效性。