Alnaqbi Khalid A, Elezbawy Baher, Fasseeh Ahmad N, Bangash Abdul Rauf, Elshamy Amin, Shendi Hiba, Aftab Mohammed I, AlMarshoodi Mozah, Gebran Nicole, AlDhaheri Noura, Fahmy Sahar A, Al Dallal Sara, Al Naeem Waeil, Abaza Sherif, Kaló Zoltán
Internal Medicine, College of Medicine & Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, ARE.
Internal Medicine/Rheumatology, Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, ARE.
Cureus. 2024 Feb 29;16(2):e55215. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55215. eCollection 2024 Feb.
Background The number of orphan drug approvals is currently increasing globally. This creates a significant burden on payers and healthcare systems. This study aimed to create a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) tool for evaluating orphan drugs within the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The intended result of the tool is to provide evidence-based guidance to decision-makers in reimbursement and procurement decisions. Methods We conducted a literature search and local expert interviews to identify relevant preliminary criteria for the MCDA tool. Then we conducted a structured consensus-building session for healthcare experts and decision-makers in the UAE to develop the Emirati MCDA tool for orphan drugs. The experts voted for the criteria to be included in the tool and their ranking according to importance, as well as the weight of each criterion and its scoring function. To improve understanding and facilitate the voting process, experts were provided with a brief illustration of similar tools conducted in other countries before the voting sessions. Finally, the tool was developed in a Microsoft Excel sheet (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington, United States), and it was validated and tested based on real case studies, then it was fine-tuned accordingly based on the experts' discussions. The final tool was provided to the attendees to guide their decisions in the reimbursement and procurement of orphan drugs. Results The created tool provides a score for each analyzed orphan drug based on its value. Ten criteria were included in the final MCDA tool. These were cost-effectiveness (25.1% of the weight), magnitude of health gain (20.1%), availability of therapeutic alternative (14.3%), disease severity (11%), budget impact (7.9%), disease rarity (5.6%), strength of clinical evidence (5.6%), burden on households (4.5%), indication uniqueness (3.2%), and patients' age (2.6%). Conclusions Implementation of evidence-based healthcare necessitates assessing the fair value of each health technology. Addressing the high unmet medical needs and improving healthcare for patients with rare diseases are priorities within the UAE. The created Emirates MCDA tool for orphan drugs has the potential to help decision-makers implement value-based and evidence-based reimbursement decisions for orphan drugs.
背景 目前全球孤儿药获批数量正在增加。这给支付方和医疗保健系统带来了巨大负担。本研究旨在创建一种多标准决策分析(MCDA)工具,用于评估阿拉伯联合酋长国(阿联酋)境内的孤儿药。该工具的预期结果是为决策者在报销和采购决策中提供循证指导。方法 我们进行了文献检索和本地专家访谈,以确定MCDA工具的相关初步标准。然后,我们为阿联酋的医疗保健专家和决策者举办了一次结构化的共识达成会议,以开发阿联酋孤儿药MCDA工具。专家们对纳入工具的标准及其按重要性的排名进行投票,以及每个标准的权重及其评分函数。为了增进理解并促进投票过程,在投票会议前向专家提供了其他国家类似工具的简要说明。最后,该工具在Microsoft Excel工作表(美国华盛顿州雷德蒙德市的微软公司)中开发,并基于实际案例研究进行了验证和测试,然后根据专家讨论进行了相应微调。最终工具提供给与会者,以指导他们在孤儿药报销和采购中的决策。结果 创建的工具根据每种分析的孤儿药的价值为其提供一个分数。最终的MCDA工具包含十个标准。这些标准分别是成本效益(权重的25.1%)、健康收益幅度(20.1%)、治疗替代方案的可用性(14.3%)、疾病严重程度(11%)、预算影响(7.9%)、疾病罕见性(5.6%)、临床证据强度(5.6%)、家庭负担(4.5%)、适应症独特性(3.2%)和患者年龄(2.6%)。结论 实施循证医疗保健需要评估每种医疗技术的公允价值。满足高度未满足的医疗需求并改善罕见病患者的医疗保健是阿联酋的优先事项。创建的阿联酋孤儿药MCDA工具有可能帮助决策者对孤儿药实施基于价值和循证的报销决策。