Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
Department of Anaesthesiology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 1;24(1):407. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10848-w.
As the COVID-19 pandemic swept across the globe at the beginning of 2020, healthcare systems were forced to rapidly adapt and expand to meet the sudden surge in demand for intensive care services. This study is the first systematic analysis of the strategies employed by German hospitals to recruit personnel and expand bed capacities during the first wave of the pandemic, and to evaluate the effectiveness of those recruitment measures.
152 German hospitals with intensive care capacities were selected and invited to participate in an online-based retrospective survey. Factors like the geographic distribution, individual COVID burden and level of care were considered for inclusion in the sample. The data were analyzed descriptively.
A total of 41 hospitals participated in the survey. The additional demand for intensive care beds was met primarily by activating intensive care beds that were previously considered as non-operational in existing intensive care units (81% of respondents) and by upgrading recovery rooms (73%). The physician staffing requirements were met at approximately 75%, while the nursing staffing requirements were only met by about 45%. Staffing needs were met through reallocations/transfers (85%), staff recruitment from parental leave or retirement (49%), increased hours worked by internal staff (49%), new staff hiring (44%) and increased use of temporary staff (32%). Staff reallocations/transfers to critical care within a hospital were rated as the most effective measure. In this context, specialized personnel mostly from anesthesiology departments were appointed to intensive care medicine.
Despite multiple recruitment efforts, the pandemic has exacerbated the nursing staff shortage. The reallocation of existing staff within hospitals was a key element in covering the staffing needs. However, additional measures and efforts are required in order to ensure that critically ill patients can be cared for without compromise. The results of this study may have important implications for healthcare providers and policymakers, offering an evidence-based foundation for responding to future public health emergencies with agility, efficiency, and success.
2020 年初,COVID-19 疫情在全球范围内蔓延,医疗系统被迫迅速适应并扩大规模,以满足对重症监护服务的突然激增需求。本研究首次系统分析了德国医院在疫情第一波期间招聘人员和扩大床位容量所采用的策略,并评估了这些招聘措施的效果。
选择了 152 家具有重症监护能力的德国医院,并邀请他们参加基于在线的回顾性调查。考虑到地理分布、个体 COVID 负担和护理水平等因素,将其纳入样本。对数据进行描述性分析。
共有 41 家医院参与了调查。主要通过激活先前被认为在现有重症监护病房中无法运行的重症监护床位(81%的受访者)和升级康复室来满足对重症监护床位的额外需求。医师人员配备需求满足了约 75%,而护理人员配备需求仅满足了约 45%。人员配备需求通过重新分配/调动(85%)、从父母假或退休中招聘员工(49%)、增加内部员工工作时间(49%)、新员工招聘(44%)和增加使用临时员工(32%)来满足。医院内重症监护病房的人员重新分配/调动被评为最有效的措施。在这种情况下,主要从麻醉科任命专门人员到重症监护医学。
尽管采取了多项招聘措施,但疫情加剧了护理人员短缺。医院内部现有员工的重新分配是满足人员配备需求的关键要素。然而,需要采取额外的措施和努力,以确保危重症患者能够得到无妥协的护理。本研究的结果可能对医疗保健提供者和政策制定者具有重要意义,为以灵活、高效和成功的方式应对未来的公共卫生紧急情况提供了基于证据的基础。