China Institute of Sport and Health Sciences, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.
School of Kinesiology and Health, Capital University of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing, China.
PeerJ. 2024 Mar 29;12:e17166. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17166. eCollection 2024.
To test the hypothesis that 'live high-base train high-interval train low' (HiHiLo) altitude training, compared to 'live low-train high' (LoHi), yields greater benefits on performance and physiological adaptations.
Sixteen young male middle-distance runners (age, 17.0 ± 1.5 y; body mass, 58.8 ± 4.9 kg; body height, 176.3 ± 4.3 cm; training years, 3-5 y; training distance per week, 30-60 km.wk) with a peak oxygen uptake averaging ~65 ml.min.kg trained in a normobaric hypoxia chamber (simulated altitude of ~2,500 m, monitored by heart rate ~170 bpm; thrice weekly) for 3 weeks. During this period, the HiHiLo group ( = 8) stayed in normobaric hypoxia (at ~2,800 m; 10 h.day), while the LoHi group ( = 8) resided near sea level. Before and immediately after the intervention, peak oxygen uptake and exercise-induced arterial hypoxemia responses (incremental cycle test) as well as running performance and time-domain heart rate variability (5-km time trial) were assessed. Hematological variables were monitored at baseline and on days 1, 7, 14 and 21 during the intervention.
Peak oxygen uptake and running performance did not differ before and after the intervention in either group (all > 0.05). Exercise-induced arterial hypoxemia responses, measured both at submaximal (240 W) and maximal loads during the incremental test, and log-transformed root mean square of successive R-R intervals during the 4-min post-run recovery period, did not change (all > 0.05). Hematocrit, mean reticulocyte absolute count and reticulocyte percentage increased above baseline levels on day 21 of the intervention (all < 0.001), irrespective of group.
Well-trained runners undertaking base training at moderate simulated altitude for 3 weeks, with or without hypoxic residence, showed no performance improvement, also with unchanged time-domain heart rate variability and exercise-induced arterial hypoxemia responses.
验证“高住高训低训”(HiHiLo)海拔训练比“低住高训”(LoHi)更能带来运动表现和生理适应方面的益处这一假设。
16 名年轻男性中长跑运动员(年龄 17.0 ± 1.5 岁;体重 58.8 ± 4.9kg;身高 176.3 ± 4.3cm;训练年限 3-5 年;每周训练距离 30-60km.wk),峰值摄氧量平均约 65ml.min.kg,在常压低氧舱(模拟海拔约 2500m,通过心率约 170bpm 监测)中每周训练 3 次,共 3 周。在此期间,HiHiLo 组( = 8)保持在常压低氧环境(海拔约 2800m,每天 10h),而 LoHi 组( = 8)居住在海平面附近。干预前后,评估了峰值摄氧量和运动引起的动脉低氧血症反应(递增循环测试)以及跑步表现和时域心率变异性(5km 计时赛)。在干预期间,每天监测基线和第 1、7、14 和 21 天的血液学变量。
两组在干预前后的峰值摄氧量和跑步表现均无差异(均>0.05)。递增测试中在亚最大(240W)和最大负荷下以及 4 分钟跑步恢复期内的均方根连续 R-R 间期的对数转换测量的运动引起的动脉低氧血症反应均未发生变化(均>0.05)。红细胞比容、平均网织红细胞绝对计数和网织红细胞百分比在干预的第 21 天高于基线水平(均<0.001),与组无关。
在模拟中度海拔进行基础训练 3 周的训练有素的跑步运动员,无论是否居住在低氧环境中,都没有表现出改善,时域心率变异性和运动引起的动脉低氧血症反应也没有变化。