School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Pain. 2024 Oct 1;165(10):2305-2312. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003228. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
Workers with low back pain (LBP) frequently seek care from physiotherapists. We sought to identify patterns of physiotherapy attendance and factors associated with these patterns in Australian workers with accepted compensation claims for LBP. We included workers with accepted workers' compensation claims for LBP from 4 Australian states between 2011 and 2015. We used trajectory modelling to identify distinct groups of workers based on the number (ie, volume) of monthly physiotherapy attendances over a 2-year period from claim acceptance. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models were used to compare the characteristics of the groups. A small but significant proportion attend numerous times over a long period. 79.0% of the sample (N = 22,767) attended physiotherapy at least once in the 2 years after claim acceptance. Among these, trajectory modelling identified 4 distinct patterns of attendance. Most (N = 11,808, 51.9%) recorded a short-term low-volume pattern, 26.8% (n = 6089) recorded a short-term high-volume pattern, 14.3% (n = 3255) recorded a long-term low-volume pattern, and 7.1% (n = 1615) recorded a long-term high-volume pattern. Workers from Victoria (OR 0.34, 99% CI 0.31, 0.37), South Australia (OR 0.69, 99% CI 0.60, 0.80), and Western Australia (OR 0.79, 99% CI 0.69, 0.88) were significantly less likely to attend physiotherapy than workers from Queensland. Victorian workers were significantly more likely to be in one of the 2 long-term trajectory groups (OR 8.17, 99% CI 6.86, 9.73; OR 18.68, 99% CI 13.57, 25.70). In conclusion, most compensated Australian workers with LBP attend physiotherapy. Significant interjurisdictional differences between attendance patterns suggests that policy may play an important role in healthcare delivery.
患有下背痛(LBP)的工人经常寻求物理治疗师的治疗。我们试图确定澳大利亚有接受赔偿要求的工人的物理治疗就诊模式和与这些模式相关的因素。我们包括了在 2011 年至 2015 年期间从澳大利亚 4 个州获得接受补偿的工人的赔偿要求。我们使用轨迹建模,根据从索赔受理之日起 2 年内每月物理治疗就诊次数(即数量),确定工人的不同群体。使用描述性统计和逻辑回归模型比较了这些群体的特征。一小部分工人就诊次数很多且持续时间长。样本中 79.0%(N=22767)在索赔受理后 2 年内至少接受过一次物理治疗。其中,轨迹建模确定了 4 种不同的就诊模式。大多数(N=11808,51.9%)记录了短期低量模式,26.8%(n=6089)记录了短期高量模式,14.3%(n=3255)记录了长期低量模式,7.1%(n=1615)记录了长期高量模式。维多利亚州(OR 0.34,99%CI 0.31,0.37)、南澳大利亚州(OR 0.69,99%CI 0.60,0.80)和西澳大利亚州(OR 0.79,99%CI 0.69,0.88)的工人接受物理治疗的可能性显著低于昆士兰州的工人。维多利亚州的工人更有可能处于 2 个长期轨迹组中的任何一个(OR 8.17,99%CI 6.86,9.73;OR 18.68,99%CI 13.57,25.70)。总之,大多数患有 LBP 的澳大利亚补偿工人都接受了物理治疗。就诊模式之间存在显著的司法管辖区差异,这表明政策可能在医疗保健提供中发挥重要作用。