Vo Jennifer, Gray Shannon, Traeger Adrian C, Di Donato Michael
Healthy Working Lives Research Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
J Occup Rehabil. 2025 Mar;35(1):48-53. doi: 10.1007/s10926-024-10194-y. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
Approximately one third of Australians with accepted time loss workers' compensation claims for low back pain (LBP) are dispensed opioid analgesics. Structured administrative payments data is scalable but does not directly link opioids to prescribers. We sought to determine whether opioid prescribing by general practitioners (GPs) to workers with workers' compensation claims for LBP can be detected in structured administrative payments data.
We used a sample of workers with accepted time loss workers' compensation claims for low back pain from 2011 to 2015 from the Australian states of Victoria and South Australia. We structured administrative data to test the assumption that opioid dispenses that occurred immediately after a GP encounter in sequence and occurred on the same date as the GP encounter are likely to be related. We measured the number and proportion of opioid dispenses with a GP encounter prior and the days between a GP encounter and opioid dispense.
Nearly one third of workers (32.2%, N = 4,128) in our sample (n = 12,816) were dispensed opioids a median of five times (interquartile range 2, 17). There were 43,324 opioid dispenses to included workers. 30,263 (69.9%) of opioid dispenses were immediately preceded by a GP encounter. Of those dispenses, 51.0% (n = 15,443) occurred on the same day as the GP encounter.
At least one third of opioids dispensed to workers with claims for LBP can be potentially linked to GP prescribing using workers' compensation structured administrative payments data. This approach could have potential applications in supporting monitoring and audit and feedback systems. Future research should test this approach with a more diverse array of pain medicines and medical practitioners.
在因腰痛(LBP)而接受工伤赔偿的澳大利亚人中,约有三分之一被开具了阿片类镇痛药。结构化行政支付数据具有可扩展性,但无法直接将阿片类药物与开处方者联系起来。我们试图确定在结构化行政支付数据中能否检测到全科医生(GP)给因LBP提出工伤赔偿申请的工人开具阿片类药物的情况。
我们使用了2011年至2015年来自澳大利亚维多利亚州和南澳大利亚州因腰痛而接受工伤赔偿的工人样本。我们对行政数据进行结构化处理,以检验这样一种假设:在全科医生诊疗后紧接着发生且与全科医生诊疗日期相同的阿片类药物配药情况可能存在关联。我们测量了在全科医生诊疗之前阿片类药物配药的数量和比例,以及全科医生诊疗与阿片类药物配药之间的天数。
在我们的样本(n = 12,816)中,近三分之一的工人(32.2%,N = 4,128)被开具了阿片类药物,中位数为5次(四分位间距为2, 17)。纳入研究的工人共接受了43,324次阿片类药物配药。30,263次(69.9%)阿片类药物配药之前紧接着是全科医生诊疗。在这些配药中,51.0%(n = 15,443)与全科医生诊疗发生在同一天。
使用工伤赔偿结构化行政支付数据,至少三分之一给因LBP提出索赔的工人开具的阿片类药物可能与全科医生的处方有关。这种方法在支持监测、审计和反馈系统方面可能具有潜在应用。未来的研究应该用更多种类的止痛药和医生来测试这种方法。