Suppr超能文献

钛与不锈钢合金桥接板治疗股骨远端骨折:钛板是否更早形成骨痂?

Titanium versus stainless steel alloy bridge plates for distal femur fractures: Does callus form earlier with titanium?

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6400 Fannin St. Suite 1700, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, 1520 San Pablo St. Suite 2000, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 May;34(4):2147-2153. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-03919-5. Epub 2024 Apr 2.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Distal femur fractures account for 3-6% of all femur fractures. Internal fixation of most distal femur fractures with an anatomic lateral locking plate should permit some motion at the metaphyseal portion of the fracture when secondary bone healing is planned by the operating surgeon. While several studies have been performed evaluating union rates for distal femur fractures with stainless steel and titanium plates, the timing of callus formation between stainless steel and titanium implants used as bridge plates for distal femur fractures (AO/OTA 33-A and -C) has been investigated to a lesser extent. We hypothesize that callus will be visualized earlier with post-operative radiographs with titanium versus stainless steel bridge plates.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive cohort of patients over 18 years of age with acute AO/OTA 33-A and 33-C fracture patterns treated with an isolated stainless steel or titanium lateral bridge plate within 4 weeks of injury by a single fellowship-trained orthopedic trauma surgeon from 2011 to 2020 at one academic Level 1 trauma center. An independent, fellowship-trained orthopedic trauma attending surgeon reviewed anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral radiographs from every available post-operative clinic visit and graded them using the Modified Radiographic Score for Tibia (mRUST).

RESULTS

Twenty-five subjects were included in the study with 10 with stainless steel and 15 with titanium plates. There were no significant differences in demographics between both groups, including age, sex, BMI, injury classification, open versus closed, mechanism, and laterality. Statistically significant increased mRUST scores, indicating increased callus formation, were seen on 12-week radiographs (8.4 vs. 11.9, p = 0.02) when titanium bridge plates were used. There were no statistically significant differences in mRUST scores at 6 or 24-weeks, but scores in the titanium group were higher in at every timepoint.

DISCUSSION

In conclusion, we observed greater callus formation at 12 weeks after internal fixation of 33-A and 33-C distal femur fractures treated with titanium locked lateral distal femoral bridge plates compared to stainless steel plates. Our data suggest that titanium metallurgy may have quicker callus formation compared to stainless steel if an isolated, lateral locked bridge plate is chosen for distal femur fracture fixation.

摘要

引言

股骨远端骨折占所有股骨骨折的 3-6%。对于大多数股骨远端骨折,采用解剖型外侧锁定钢板内固定,如果手术医生计划进行二期骨愈合,那么在骨折的干骺端部分应该可以允许一些活动。虽然已经进行了几项研究来评估不锈钢和钛板治疗股骨远端骨折的愈合率,但对于作为股骨远端骨折桥接板(AO/OTA 33-A 和 -C)的不锈钢和钛植入物之间的骨痂形成时间的研究相对较少。我们假设与不锈钢桥接板相比,钛制桥接板术后 X 光片上更早能观察到骨痂。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2011 年至 2020 年期间,在一家学术性一级创伤中心,由一位 fellowship 培训的骨科创伤外科医生对 18 岁以上的急性 AO/OTA 33-A 和 33-C 骨折患者进行了单独的不锈钢或钛制外侧桥接板治疗,随访时间超过 4 周的连续患者队列。一位独立的 fellowship 培训的骨科创伤主治医生审查了每个可获得的术后临床就诊的前后位(AP)和侧位 X 光片,并使用改良胫骨 X 光评分(mRUST)对其进行分级。

结果

本研究共纳入 25 名患者,其中 10 名使用不锈钢板,15 名使用钛板。两组患者的人口统计学特征无显著差异,包括年龄、性别、BMI、损伤分类、开放性或闭合性、机制和侧别。使用钛制桥接板时,12 周 X 光片上的 mRUST 评分明显升高,表明骨痂形成增加(8.4 对 11.9,p=0.02)。6 周和 24 周时 mRUST 评分无统计学差异,但钛组在每个时间点的评分均较高。

讨论

总之,我们观察到在使用钛制锁定外侧股骨远端桥接板治疗 33-A 和 33-C 股骨远端骨折后 12 周时,骨痂形成量较不锈钢板更大。如果选择单独的外侧锁定桥接板治疗股骨远端骨折固定,我们的数据表明,钛金属可能比不锈钢具有更快的骨痂形成速度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验