Suppr超能文献

远皮质锁定构建物在股骨远端骨折愈合中的 X 射线表现:与标准锁定钢板的对比研究。

Radiographic Healing of Far Cortical Locking Constructs in Distal Femur Fractures: A Comparative Study With Standard Locking Plates.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Ratchathewi, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

J Orthop Trauma. 2019 Jun;33(6):277-283. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001464.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the radiographic healing of far cortical locking (FCL) construct fixation in distal femur fractures compared with traditional locking plate (LP) constructs.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort of 143 consecutive patients with 146 distal femur fractures.

SETTING

Level I trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: After excluding patients with OTA/AO type B fractures, referred nonunion cases, patients younger than 16 years, and patients with less than 24 weeks of follow-up, 69 patients with 70 total fractures were included for analysis.

INTERVENTION

AP and lateral knee radiographs were blinded to type of screws and individually reviewed by 3 orthopaedic trauma surgeons.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The modified RUST (mRUST) score was our primary outcome measure. mRUST scores were assigned at 6, 12, and 24 weeks and final follow-up based on AP and lateral radiographs and compared between FCL and LP groups as a tool for evaluating fracture healing. Secondary outcomes compared between FCL and LP included union rate and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences in mRUST scores were noted between FCL and LP groups at 6 weeks (P = 0.040), 12 weeks (P = 0.034), 24 weeks (0.044), and final follow-up (P = 0.048). There was no significant difference in union or specific complication rates between the 2 groups. The union rate was 90.5% and 82.1% for the FCL and LP groups, respectively, at final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first comparative study between FCL and LP constructs. The FCL group was noted to have significantly higher mRUST scores at all periods indicating increased callus formation, but the differences seen were small and there were no differences in healing rates or complications between the 2 groups, thus bringing the clinical benefit of FCL into question. Further prospective study designs are needed to compare FCL with LP constructs and to investigate the role of interfragmentary motion on callus formation in distal femur fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

目的

研究远皮质锁定(FCL)构建固定在治疗股骨远端骨折方面与传统锁定钢板(LP)构建的放射学愈合情况。

设计

回顾性连续纳入 143 例股骨远端骨折患者,共 146 例。

地点

一级创伤中心。

患者/参与者:排除 OTA/AO 型 B 骨折、非愈合转诊、16 岁以下和随访时间少于 24 周的患者后,纳入 69 例患者,共 70 例完全骨折进行分析。

干预

AP 和侧位膝关节 X 线片均不显示螺钉类型,并由 3 位骨科创伤外科医生单独进行评估。

测量结果

改良 RUST(mRUST)评分是我们的主要观察指标。根据 AP 和侧位 X 线片,在 6、12 和 24 周以及最终随访时分别对 mRUST 评分进行评估,并将 FCL 和 LP 组之间的评分作为评估骨折愈合的工具进行比较。FCL 和 LP 之间的次要结果比较包括愈合率和术后并发症。

结果

在 6 周(P=0.040)、12 周(P=0.034)、24 周(P=0.044)和最终随访(P=0.048)时,FCL 和 LP 组之间的 mRUST 评分存在统计学显著差异。两组之间的愈合率或特定并发症发生率无显著差异。最终随访时,FCL 和 LP 组的愈合率分别为 90.5%和 82.1%。

结论

据我们所知,这是 FCL 和 LP 构建物之间的首次比较研究。在所有时期,FCL 组的 mRUST 评分均显著较高,表明骨痂形成增加,但差异较小,两组之间愈合率和并发症无差异,从而对 FCL 的临床益处提出质疑。需要进一步的前瞻性研究设计来比较 FCL 与 LP 构建物,并研究界面运动对股骨远端骨折骨痂形成的作用。

证据水平

治疗 III 级。请参阅作者说明以获取完整的证据水平描述。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验