Faculty of Medicine, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, 10520, Thailand.
Neurol Sci. 2024 Sep;45(9):4451-4462. doi: 10.1007/s10072-024-07496-7. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine whether patients with episodic (EM) or chronic migraine (CM), who were treated with anti-CGRP antibodies, showed a reversal from medication overuse (MO) or medication overuse headache (MOH) status at their baseline to non-overuse status. Furthermore, this study aimed to establish which acute headache medication (AHM) categories responded more effectively to anti-CGRP antibodies.
A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed database for relevant studies from January 2013 to September 2023. We included phase three randomized controlled trials to examine the role of anti-CGRP antibodies in patients with EM or CM and their MO status. A meta-analysis was conducted to find the association between anti-CGRP antibodies and the number of EM and CM patients with MO or MOH at baseline that reverted to non-MO status or below the MOH threshold.
The initial search yielded a total of 345 studies. After removing duplicates and screening with inclusion criteria, 5 studies fulfilled our conditions. Each study reviewed the response to changes in the MO status of patients after receiving anti-CGRP antibodies, including eptinezumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, and erenumab, compared to placebo. Our study analyzed three AHM categories: triptans, simple analgesics, and multiple drugs. The overall relative risk (RR) was 1.44 (95% CI, 1.31 to 1.59; p < 0.001). The RRs for triptans, simple analgesics, and multi-drug groups were 1.71 (95% CI, 1.53 to 1.91; p < 0.001), 1.10 (95% CI, 0.83 to 1.47; p = 0.5), and 1.29 (95%CI 1.14 to 1.46; p < 0.001) respectively.
The meta-analysis has shown that anti-CGRP antibodies were statistically significant in transitioning from MO or MOH status to non-MO status or below the MOH threshold (RR = 1.44) for all included studies and all AHM categories except for simple analgesics. Patients from the triptan group had the highest RR of 1.71 with a p-value < 0.001, while the simple analgesics group had an RR of 1.10, however, with a p-value > 0.05. Interestingly, this analysis can be interpreted as that anti-CGRP antibodies might not be effective in reducing simple analgesics use in EM or CM patients. Further studies are needed to investigate these matters.
本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是确定接受抗 CGRP 抗体治疗的发作性(EM)或慢性偏头痛(CM)患者,其基线时药物过度使用(MO)或药物过度使用性头痛(MOH)状态是否会转为非过度使用状态。此外,本研究旨在确定哪些急性头痛药物(AHM)类别对抗 CGRP 抗体的反应更有效。
在 PubMed 数据库中进行了系统搜索,以查找 2013 年 1 月至 2023 年 9 月期间的相关研究。我们纳入了三期随机对照试验,以研究抗 CGRP 抗体在 EM 或 CM 患者及其 MO 状态中的作用。进行荟萃分析以寻找抗 CGRP 抗体与基线时患有 MO 或 MOH 的 EM 和 CM 患者数量之间的关联,这些患者的 MO 或 MOH 状态转为非 MO 状态或低于 MOH 阈值。
最初的搜索共产生了 345 项研究。在去除重复项并根据纳入标准进行筛选后,有 5 项研究符合我们的条件。每项研究都回顾了接受抗 CGRP 抗体后患者 MO 状态变化的反应,包括依替唑仑、氟那佐米、加奈佐米和依那西普,与安慰剂相比。我们的研究分析了三种 AHM 类别:曲普坦类、非甾体抗炎药和多种药物。总体相对风险(RR)为 1.44(95%CI,1.31-1.59;p<0.001)。曲普坦类、非甾体抗炎药和多药组的 RR 分别为 1.71(95%CI,1.53-1.91;p<0.001)、1.10(95%CI,0.83-1.47;p=0.5)和 1.29(95%CI 1.14-1.46;p<0.001)。
荟萃分析表明,抗 CGRP 抗体在从 MO 或 MOH 状态向非 MO 状态或低于 MOH 阈值转变方面具有统计学意义(RR=1.44),所有纳入研究和所有 AHM 类别均如此,除了非甾体抗炎药。曲普坦组的 RR 最高,为 1.71,p 值<0.001,而非甾体抗炎药组的 RR 为 1.10,p 值>0.05。有趣的是,这一分析可以解释为抗 CGRP 抗体可能不会有效减少 EM 或 CM 患者对非甾体抗炎药的使用。需要进一步的研究来调查这些问题。