Department of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Institute of Sports Science, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Phys Ther. 2024 Jul 2;104(7). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzae053.
The objective of this study was to synthesize the evidence from systematic reviews on the efficacy of physical therapy and exercise therapy, including interventional elements explicitly aiming at physical activity promotion (PAP) in patients with noncommunicable diseases (NCDs).
PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched from inception to February 28, 2023. Two independent reviewers screened the literature to identify systematic reviews that evaluated the effects of physical therapy and exercise therapy, including PAP interventions. Patient-reported and device-based measures of physical activity (PA) outcomes were included. Qualitative and quantitative data from systematic reviews were extracted by 2 independent reviewers. Assessment of the methodological quality of the included systematic reviews was performed using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR 2). We assessed primary study overlap by calculating the corrected covered area and conducted the evidence synthesis in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
Fourteen systematic reviews were included in the present overview, including patients with a variety of NCDs. Most included systematic reviews had critically low (n = 5) to low (n = 7) methodological quality. Most meta-analyses (67%; 8/12) provided evidence supporting the short- and long-term efficacy of PAP interventions, but not all pooled estimates were clinically relevant. Only three of the systematic reviews with meta-analysis included an assessment of the certainty of the evidence. The evidence from systematic reviews without meta-analysis was inconclusive.
The results of the present overview suggest that PAP interventions in physical therapy or exercise therapy may be effective in improving PA for patients with NCDs in the short and long term. The results should be interpreted with caution due to the limited certainty of evidence and critically low-to-low methodological quality of the included systematic reviews. Both high-quality primary studies and systematic reviews are required to confirm these results.
There is limited evidence that PAP interventions in physical therapy and exercise therapy may be effective in improving PA for patients with NCDs.
本研究旨在综合系统评价中关于物理治疗和运动疗法疗效的证据,包括明确针对非传染性疾病(NCD)患者的体力活动促进(PAP)的干预元素。
从建库到 2023 年 2 月 28 日,我们在 PubMed、Scopus、PsycINFO 和 Cochrane 系统评价数据库中进行了检索。两名独立的审查员筛选文献,以确定评估物理治疗和运动疗法,包括 PAP 干预效果的系统评价。包括患者报告和基于设备的体力活动(PA)结果的措施。两名独立的审查员提取系统评价的定性和定量数据。使用评估系统评价的测量工具(AMSTAR 2)评估纳入系统评价的方法学质量。我们通过计算校正覆盖面积来评估主要研究的重叠情况,并按照 Cochrane 干预系统评价手册进行证据综合。
本综述共纳入 14 项系统评价,包括患有各种 NCD 的患者。大多数纳入的系统评价的方法学质量极低(n=5)到低(n=7)。大多数荟萃分析(67%;8/12)提供了支持 PAP 干预短期和长期疗效的证据,但并非所有汇总估计都具有临床意义。只有 3 项具有荟萃分析的系统评价包括对证据确定性的评估。没有荟萃分析的系统评价的证据不确定。
本综述的结果表明,物理治疗或运动治疗中的 PAP 干预可能在短期和长期内有效改善 NCD 患者的 PA。由于证据的确定性有限,以及纳入的系统评价的方法学质量极低到低,结果应谨慎解释。需要高质量的原始研究和系统评价来证实这些结果。
有有限的证据表明,物理治疗和运动治疗中的 PAP 干预可能有效改善 NCD 患者的 PA。