• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估黑色素瘤预后:回顾性多研究分析中患者特征、生存与 BRAF、NRAS、KIT 和 TWT 突变之间的相互作用。

Assessing melanoma prognosis: the interplay between patient profiles, survival, and BRAF, NRAS, KIT, and TWT mutations in a retrospective multi-study analysis.

机构信息

Department of Education, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.

Derpartment of Education, UT Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas.

出版信息

Melanoma Res. 2024 Oct 1;34(5):419-428. doi: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000968. Epub 2024 Mar 29.

DOI:10.1097/CMR.0000000000000968
PMID:38564430
Abstract

The incidence and prevalence of melanoma are increasing globally, presenting a significant public health concern. The main genetic drivers of melanoma include BRAF, NRAS, KIT and triple wild-type (TWT) mutations. Little is known about the effects of these mutations on outcomes in terms of demographics and patient characteristics. We examined differences in melanoma mortality risk and mutation count across mutation type and patient disease profile. We extrapolated primary melanoma patient data from 14 studies via the cBioportal database. Patients were divided into demographic groups and classified according to BRAF, NRAS, KIT and TWT mutation status. Analyses included two-sample Student t -test and two-way analysis of variance tests analysis with Tukey's post hoc test. Survival outcomes were compared via Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox regression. NRAS-mutated patients exhibited decreased overall survival compared to BRAF-mutated patients. Male patients had higher mutation counts across all gene groups than females, with the fewest TWT mutations in comparison to BRAF, NRAS and KIT mutations. Males also exhibited increased mortality risk for NRAS, KIT and TWT mutations compared to BRAF mutations. An unknown primary melanoma was associated with increased mortality risk across all gene groups. NRAS-mutated acral melanoma patients had an increased mortality risk compared to NRAS-mutated cutaneous melanoma patients. Older patients had a higher mortality risk than younger patients. Patients with heavier versus lower weights had lower mortality risk, which was more pronounced for BRAF-mutated patients. These relationships highlight the importance of demographic and pathologic relationships to aid in risk assessment and personalize treatment plans.

摘要

黑色素瘤的发病率和患病率在全球范围内呈上升趋势,这是一个重大的公共卫生问题。黑色素瘤的主要遗传驱动因素包括 BRAF、NRAS、KIT 和三野生型(TWT)突变。关于这些突变对人口统计学和患者特征方面的结果的影响,我们知之甚少。我们研究了突变类型和患者疾病特征对黑色素瘤死亡率风险和突变计数的影响。我们通过 cBioportal 数据库从 14 项研究中推断出原发性黑色素瘤患者数据。患者被分为人口统计学组,并根据 BRAF、NRAS、KIT 和 TWT 突变状态进行分类。分析包括双样本 t 检验和双向方差分析,以及 Tukey 事后检验。通过 Kaplan-Meier 曲线和 Cox 回归比较生存结果。与 BRAF 突变患者相比,NRAS 突变患者的总体生存率降低。与女性相比,所有基因组的男性患者的突变计数都更高,与 BRAF、NRAS 和 KIT 突变相比,TWT 突变最少。与 BRAF 突变相比,男性的 NRAS、KIT 和 TWT 突变的死亡率风险更高。未知原发性黑色素瘤与所有基因组的死亡率风险增加有关。与肢端黑色素瘤患者相比,NRAS 突变的皮肤黑色素瘤患者的死亡率风险增加。年龄较大的患者比年轻患者的死亡率风险更高。与体重较轻的患者相比,体重较重的患者的死亡率风险更高,这在 BRAF 突变患者中更为明显。这些关系强调了人口统计学和病理关系的重要性,以帮助进行风险评估和制定个性化治疗计划。

相似文献

1
Assessing melanoma prognosis: the interplay between patient profiles, survival, and BRAF, NRAS, KIT, and TWT mutations in a retrospective multi-study analysis.评估黑色素瘤预后:回顾性多研究分析中患者特征、生存与 BRAF、NRAS、KIT 和 TWT 突变之间的相互作用。
Melanoma Res. 2024 Oct 1;34(5):419-428. doi: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000968. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
2
Prevalence of BRAF, NRAS and c-KIT mutations in Slovenian patients with advanced melanoma.斯洛文尼亚晚期黑色素瘤患者中 BRAF、NRAS 和 c-KIT 突变的流行情况。
Radiol Oncol. 2018 Apr 26;52(3):289-295. doi: 10.2478/raon-2018-0017.
3
KIT, NRAS, BRAF and PTEN mutations in a sample of Swedish patients with acral lentiginous melanoma.肢端雀斑样黑素瘤瑞典患者样本中的 KIT、NRAS、BRAF 和 PTEN 突变。
J Dermatol Sci. 2013 Dec;72(3):284-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2013.07.013. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
4
Prognostic and predictive values of oncogenic BRAF, NRAS, c-KIT and MITF in cutaneous and mucous melanoma.致癌 BRAF、NRAS、c-KIT 和 MITF 在皮肤和黏膜黑色素瘤中的预后和预测价值。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Aug;29(8):1530-8. doi: 10.1111/jdv.12910. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
5
, and Advanced Melanoma: Clinico-pathological Features, Targeted-Therapy Strategies and Survival.以及晚期黑色素瘤:临床病理特征、靶向治疗策略与生存情况
Anticancer Res. 2017 Dec;37(12):7043-7048. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.12175.
6
Clinical characteristics associated with BRAF, NRAS and KIT mutations in Japanese melanoma patients.日本黑色素瘤患者中与BRAF、NRAS和KIT突变相关的临床特征。
J Dermatol Sci. 2015 Oct;80(1):33-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2015.07.012. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
7
BRAF, KIT, and NRAS Mutations of Acral Melanoma in White Patients.肢端黑色素瘤中 BRAF、KIT 和 NRAS 基因突变。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2020 Apr 15;153(5):664-671. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqz209.
8
Association Between NRAS and BRAF Mutational Status and Melanoma-Specific Survival Among Patients With Higher-Risk Primary Melanoma.NRAS 和 BRAF 基因突变状态与高危原发性黑色素瘤患者的黑色素瘤特异性生存之间的关联。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Jun;1(3):359-68. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.0493.
9
Mutations in the BRAF, NRAS, and C-KIT Genes of Patients Diagnosed with Melanoma in Colombia Population.哥伦比亚人群中诊断为黑色素瘤患者的 BRAF、NRAS 和 C-KIT 基因突变。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Jul 22;2020:2046947. doi: 10.1155/2020/2046947. eCollection 2020.
10
The molecular profile of metastatic melanoma in Australia.澳大利亚转移性黑色素瘤的分子特征。
Pathology. 2016 Feb;48(2):188-93. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2015.12.008. Epub 2016 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Confronting Melanoma Radioresistance: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies.应对黑色素瘤放射抗性:机制与治疗策略
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Aug 14;17(16):2648. doi: 10.3390/cancers17162648.
2
Prognostic Role of Clinicopathological Characteristics and Serum Markers in Metastatic Melanoma Patients Treated with BRAF and MEK Inhibitors.临床病理特征和血清标志物在接受BRAF和MEK抑制剂治疗的转移性黑色素瘤患者中的预后作用
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Aug 27;16(17):2981. doi: 10.3390/cancers16172981.