• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阑尾炎患儿粘连性肠梗阻的风险:一项系统评价

The Risk of Adhesive Bowel Obstruction in Children With Appendicitis: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Doshi Neel, Bandyopadhyay Soham, Green Madeline, Richardson Edward, Komber Ahmad, Chen Si Emma, Shah Rahul, Lakhoo Kokila

机构信息

University of Oxford and Oxford University Hospitals, Headley Way, Headington, Oxford, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom.

University of Oxford and Oxford University Hospitals, Headley Way, Headington, Oxford, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 2024 Aug;59(8):1477-1485. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.03.021. Epub 2024 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.03.021
PMID:38565474
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Complicated appendicitis is associated with a higher risk of postoperative complications, including adhesive bowel obstruction. The aim of this meta-analysis is to investigate the difference in rates of postoperative bowel obstruction in paediatric patients with complicated versus simple appendicitis and whether this is influenced by the surgical approach.

METHODS

A systematic literature search following PRISMA guidelines was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library for studies that analysed incidence of adhesive bowel obstruction in paediatric patients after appendicectomy. Studies from 1998 to 2022 were included in analysis. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (ID CRD42022309769).

RESULTS

Pooled analysis of 6 studies with low risk of bias and adequate follow up periods, considering 58,962 cases of appendicectomy, revealed complex appendicitis was associated with a near two-fold increase in incidence of SBO (pooled odds ratio 2.02 (95% CI 1.35-2.69)). Interestingly, a similar pooled analysis of 10 studies, considering 62,433 cases of appendicectomy, revealed no significant difference between open and laparoscopic management of complex appendicitis (pooled odds ratio 0.93 (95% CI 0.24 to 1.62)).

CONCLUSION

Complex appendicitis is associated with a two-fold increase in the rates of adhesive bowel obstruction. Whilst there are cosmetic advantages of a laparoscopic approach, surgical expertise should be favoured in decision making relating to surgical approach (laparoscopic versus open) as the evidence for a laparoscopic approach reducing risks of adhesive bowel obstruction is not convincing.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

摘要

目的

复杂性阑尾炎与术后并发症风险较高相关,包括粘连性肠梗阻。本荟萃分析的目的是研究复杂性阑尾炎与单纯性阑尾炎患儿术后肠梗阻发生率的差异,以及这是否受手术方式的影响。

方法

按照PRISMA指南,使用MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane图书馆进行系统文献检索,以分析小儿阑尾切除术后粘连性肠梗阻发生率的研究。纳入1998年至2022年的研究进行分析。研究方案已在PROSPERO上注册(ID CRD42022309769)。

结果

对6项偏倚风险低且随访期足够的研究进行汇总分析,纳入58,962例阑尾切除术病例,结果显示复杂性阑尾炎与粘连性小肠梗阻发生率增加近两倍相关(汇总比值比2.02(95%CI 1.35 - 2.69))。有趣的是,对10项研究进行类似的汇总分析,纳入62,433例阑尾切除术病例,结果显示复杂性阑尾炎的开放手术和腹腔镜手术治疗之间无显著差异(汇总比值比0.93(95%CI 0.24至1.62))。

结论

复杂性阑尾炎与粘连性肠梗阻发生率增加两倍相关。虽然腹腔镜手术有美容优势,但在决定手术方式(腹腔镜与开放)时,应优先考虑手术专业知识,因为腹腔镜手术降低粘连性肠梗阻风险的证据并不令人信服。

证据级别

二级。

相似文献

1
The Risk of Adhesive Bowel Obstruction in Children With Appendicitis: A Systematic Review.阑尾炎患儿粘连性肠梗阻的风险:一项系统评价
J Pediatr Surg. 2024 Aug;59(8):1477-1485. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.03.021. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
2
Single-incision versus conventional multi-incision laparoscopic appendicectomy for suspected uncomplicated appendicitis.单切口与传统多孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗疑似单纯性阑尾炎的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 5;11(11):CD009022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009022.pub3.
3
Abdominal drainage to prevent intraperitoneal abscess after appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.阑尾切除术后放置腹腔引流以预防复杂性阑尾炎术后腹腔脓肿。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 11;4(4):CD010168. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010168.pub5.
4
Early versus delayed appendicectomy for appendiceal phlegmon or abscess.阑尾蜂窝织炎或脓肿的早期与延迟阑尾切除术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 2;6(6):CD011670. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011670.pub2.
5
Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis.阑尾切除术与抗生素治疗急性阑尾炎的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 29;4(4):CD015038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015038.pub2.
6
Comparison of transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy (TULAA) vs conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (CTLA) in the pediatric population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.小儿经脐腹腔镜辅助阑尾切除术(TULAA)与传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术(CTLA)的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Jun 25;184(7):445. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06286-3.
7
Abdominal drainage to prevent intra-peritoneal abscess after appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.复杂性阑尾炎阑尾切除术后腹腔引流预防腹腔脓肿。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 17;8(8):CD010168. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010168.pub4.
8
Oral traditional Chinese medication for adhesive small bowel obstruction.口服中药治疗粘连性小肠梗阻。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16;2012(5):CD008836. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008836.pub2.
9
Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in pregnancy: a systematic review.妊娠期腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:一项系统评价
Int J Surg. 2008 Aug;6(4):339-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2008.01.006. Epub 2008 Feb 1.
10
Are There Specific Indications for Laparoscopic Appendectomy? A Review and Critical Appraisal of the Literature.腹腔镜阑尾切除术有特定指征吗?文献综述与批判性评价
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015 Nov;25(11):897-902. doi: 10.1089/lap.2014.0624.