Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Apr 2;24(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02496-8.
Differences exist between sexes in pain and pain-related outcomes, such as development of chronic pain. Previous studies suggested a higher risk for pain chronification in female patients. Furthermore, pain catastrophizing is an important risk factor for chronification of pain. However, it is unclear whether sex differences in catastrophic thinking could explain the sex differences in pain chronification.
The aim of this study was to examine sex differences in pain catastrophizing. Additionally, we investigated pain catastrophizing as a potential mediator of sex differences in the transition of acute to chronic pain.
DESIGN, SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: Adults visiting one of the 15 participating emergency departments in the Netherlands with acute pain-related complaints. Subjects had to meet inclusion criteria and complete questionnaires about their health and pain.
The outcomes in this prospective cohort study were pain catastrophizing (short form pain catastrophizing) and pain chronification at 90 days (Numeric Rating Scale ≥ 1). Data was analysed using univariate and multivariable logistic regression models. Finally, stratified regression analyses were conducted to assess whether differences in pain catastrophizing accounted for observed differences in pain chronification between sexes.
In total 1,906 patients were included. Females catastrophized pain significantly more than males (p < 0.001). Multiple regression analyses suggested that pain catastrophizing is associated with pain chronification in both sexes.
This study reported differences between sexes in catastrophic cognitions in the development of chronic pain. This is possibly of clinical importance to identify high-risk patients and ensure an early intervention to prevent the transition from acute to chronic pain.
疼痛及其相关结果(如慢性疼痛的发展)存在性别差异。先前的研究表明,女性患者发生疼痛慢性化的风险更高。此外,疼痛灾难化是疼痛慢性化的一个重要危险因素。然而,尚不清楚灾难性思维的性别差异是否可以解释疼痛慢性化的性别差异。
本研究旨在检查疼痛灾难化的性别差异。此外,我们还研究了疼痛灾难化是否可以作为急性疼痛向慢性疼痛转变的性别差异的潜在中介因素。
设计、设置和参与者:患有急性疼痛相关疾病的成年人在荷兰的 15 家参与急诊室中的一家就诊。受试者必须符合纳入标准并完成有关其健康和疼痛的问卷。
本前瞻性队列研究的结果是疼痛灾难化(疼痛灾难化简短量表)和 90 天的疼痛慢性化(数字评分量表≥1)。使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归模型分析数据。最后,进行分层回归分析,以评估疼痛灾难化是否可以解释男女之间疼痛慢性化的差异。
共纳入 1906 名患者。女性对疼痛的灾难化程度明显高于男性(p<0.001)。多元回归分析表明,疼痛灾难化与两性的疼痛慢性化有关。
本研究报告了慢性疼痛发展过程中性别间灾难性认知的差异。这可能对临床具有重要意义,可以识别高风险患者,并确保早期干预以防止急性疼痛向慢性疼痛的转变。