• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经鼻间歇正压通气(INSURE)与微创肺泡表面活性物质给药(LISA)治疗早产儿的回顾性研究

Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) Versus INSURE Method in Preterm Infants: a Retrospective Study.

机构信息

Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, "Santa Maria" Hospital, Terni, Italy.

出版信息

Med Arch. 2024;78(2):112-116. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2024.78.112-116.

DOI:10.5455/medarh.2024.78.112-116
PMID:38566872
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10983101/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. Early nasal CPAP and selective administration of surfactant via the endotracheal tube are widely used in the treatment of RDS in preterm infants.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the need for intubation and mechanical ventilation after surfactant delivery between LISA-treated and INSURE-treated premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).

METHODS

Retrospective registry-based cohort study enrolled 36 newborns admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit of the "Santa Maria" Hospital of Terni between 2016 and 2023. As a primary outcome, we followed the need for intubation and mechanical ventilation within 72 hours of life, while the secondary outcomes were major neonatal morbidities and death before discharge.

RESULTS

The LISA group and the INSURE group included 13 and 23 newborns respectively. Demographic features showed no significant differences between the two groups. The need for mechanical ventilation in the first 72 hours of life was similar in both groups (p >0.99). There were no significant differences in morbidities.

CONCLUSION

LISA and INSURE are equally effective modalities for surfactant administration for the treatment of RDS in preterm infants.

摘要

背景

呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)是早产儿发病率和死亡率的主要原因。早期经鼻持续气道正压通气(CPAP)和经气管内管选择性给予表面活性剂广泛应用于早产儿 RDS 的治疗。

目的

本研究旨在比较 LISA 治疗与 INSURE 治疗呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)早产儿在表面活性剂给药后需要插管和机械通气的情况。

方法

这是一项基于回顾性注册的队列研究,共纳入 2016 年至 2023 年期间在特尔尼“圣玛丽亚”医院新生儿重症监护病房收治的 36 名新生儿。主要结局是在出生后 72 小时内需要插管和机械通气,次要结局是主要新生儿并发症和出院前死亡。

结果

LISA 组和 INSURE 组分别纳入 13 名和 23 名新生儿。两组的人口统计学特征无显著差异。两组在出生后 72 小时内需要机械通气的情况相似(p>0.99)。两组的并发症也无显著差异。

结论

LISA 和 INSURE 都是治疗早产儿 RDS 时给予表面活性剂的有效方法。

相似文献

1
Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) Versus INSURE Method in Preterm Infants: a Retrospective Study.经鼻间歇正压通气(INSURE)与微创肺泡表面活性物质给药(LISA)治疗早产儿的回顾性研究
Med Arch. 2024;78(2):112-116. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2024.78.112-116.
2
The influence of the technique of surfactant administration (LISA vs INSURE) on the outcomes of respiratory distress syndrome treatment in preterm infants.表面活性剂给药技术(肺内滴注法与气管插管-肺表面活性物质给药法)对早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征治疗结局的影响。
Dev Period Med. 2019;23(3):163-171. doi: 10.34763/devperiodmed.20192303.163171.
3
Less invasive surfactant administration via infant feeding tube versus InSurE method in preterm infants: a randomized control trial.经婴儿喂养管给予微创表面活性剂与 InSurE 方法在早产儿中的应用:一项随机对照试验。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 19;12(1):21955. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23557-3.
4
Surfactant administration in preterm babies (28-36 weeks) with respiratory distress syndrome: LISA versus InSurE, an open-label randomized controlled trial.表面活性物质在有呼吸窘迫综合征的早产儿(28-36 周)中的应用:LISA 与 InSurE,一项开放标签随机对照试验。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2023 Mar;58(3):738-745. doi: 10.1002/ppul.26246. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
5
Less Invasive Surfactant Administration in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome.在患有呼吸窘迫综合征的早产儿中进行的微创表面活性剂给药
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2019 Mar;29(3):226-330. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2019.03.226.
6
Surfactant administration methods for premature newborns: LISA vs. INSURE comparative analysis.表面活性物质给药方法用于早产儿:LISA 与 INSURE 比较分析。
J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2024;17(2):233-239. doi: 10.3233/NPM-230194.
7
Effects of less invasive surfactant administration versus intubation-surfactant-extubation on bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a single-center, retrospective study from China.经鼻持续气道正压通气与肺表面活性物质联合鼻塞式气道正压通气治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的临床疗效比较 目的:探讨经鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)与肺表面活性物质(PS)联合鼻塞式气道正压通气(CPAP)治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征(NRDS)的临床疗效。方法:选择 2019 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月在我院接受治疗的 86 例 NRDS 早产儿作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,每组 43 例。观察组给予 NCPAP 联合 PS 治疗,对照组给予 CPAP 联合 PS 治疗。比较两组患儿的临床疗效、血气指标、机械通气时间、住院时间及不良反应发生情况。结果:观察组患儿的总有效率为 95.35%,明显高于对照组的 76.74%(P<0.05)。治疗后,观察组患儿的 PaO2、SaO2 水平明显高于对照组,PaCO2 水平明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组患儿的机械通气时间和住院时间明显短于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组患儿的不良反应总发生率为 4.65%,明显低于对照组的 18.60%(P<0.05)。结论:NCPAP 联合 PS 治疗 NRDS 早产儿的临床疗效优于 CPAP 联合 PS 治疗,能有效改善血气指标,缩短机械通气时间和住院时间,降低不良反应发生率。
BMC Pulm Med. 2022 Dec 5;22(1):462. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-02270-x.
8
Five-year single center experience on surfactant treatment in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: LISA vs INSURE.5 年单中心肺表面活性物质治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征经验:LISA 与 INSURE 比较。
Early Hum Dev. 2019 Aug;135:32-36. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
9
Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) vs. Intubation Surfactant Extubation (InSurE) in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.经鼻持续气道正压通气与肺表面活性物质治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的随机对照研究
J Trop Pediatr. 2021 Aug 27;67(4). doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmab086.
10
Less invasive surfactant administration versus endotracheal surfactant instillation followed by limited peak pressure ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome in China: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.经鼻给予肺表面活性物质与气管内给予肺表面活性物质后行小潮气量通气治疗中国呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿的随机对照试验研究方案
Trials. 2020 Jun 11;21(1):516. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04390-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Less invasive surfactant administration in the delivery room: A quality improvement initiative.产房内侵入性较小的表面活性剂给药:一项质量改进举措。
J Perinatol. 2025 Jul 10. doi: 10.1038/s41372-025-02350-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: Pathogenesis and Pathophysiology.支气管肺发育不良:发病机制与病理生理学
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 22;12(13):4207. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134207.
2
European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome: 2022 Update.欧洲呼吸窘迫综合征管理共识指南:2022 年更新版。
Neonatology. 2023;120(1):3-23. doi: 10.1159/000528914. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
3
International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity, Third Edition.国际早产儿视网膜病变分类,第三版。
Ophthalmology. 2021 Oct;128(10):e51-e68. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.05.031. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
4
Minimally invasive surfactant therapy versus InSurE in preterm neonates of 28 to 34 weeks with respiratory distress syndrome on non-invasive positive pressure ventilation-a randomized controlled trial.经鼻持续气道正压通气治疗的 28 至 34 周呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿应用微创肺表面活性物质治疗与 InSurE 的随机对照研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2020 Aug;179(8):1287-1293. doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03682-9. Epub 2020 May 27.
5
Influence of time under mechanical ventilation on bronchopulmonary dysplasia severity in extremely preterm infants: a pilot study.机械通气时间对极早产儿支气管肺发育不良严重程度的影响:一项初步研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2020 May 21;20(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02129-2.
6
Less invasive surfactant administration: best practices and unanswered questions.经鼻或经气管给予表面活性剂:最佳实践和未解决的问题。
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2020 Apr;32(2):228-234. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000878.
7
Surfactant therapy in premature babies: SurE or InSurE.早产儿肺表面活性物质治疗:SurE 还是 InSurE。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2019 Nov;54(11):1747-1752. doi: 10.1002/ppul.24479. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
8
Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA): chances and limitations.经鼻给予表面活性物质(LISA):机会与限制。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019 Nov;104(6):F655-F659. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316557. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
9
Less Invasive Surfactant Administration in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome.在患有呼吸窘迫综合征的早产儿中进行的微创表面活性剂给药
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2019 Mar;29(3):226-330. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2019.03.226.
10
Treatment and outcome data of very low birth weight infants treated with less invasive surfactant administration in comparison to intubation and mechanical ventilation in the clinical setting of a cross-sectional observational multicenter study.在一项横断面观察性多中心研究的临床环境中,与气管插管和机械通气相比,接受较少有创性肺表面活性剂治疗的极低出生体重儿的治疗和结局数据。
Eur J Pediatr. 2018 Aug;177(8):1207-1217. doi: 10.1007/s00431-018-3179-x. Epub 2018 May 28.