• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伦理与公平的数字健康研究:确保种族化社区数据治理中的自决权

Ethical and Equitable Digital Health Research: Ensuring Self-Determination in Data Governance for Racialized Communities.

作者信息

Islam Mozharul, Valiani Arafaat A, Datta Ranjan, Chowdhury Mohammad, Turin Tanvir C

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Department of Sociology, Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University, İstanbul, Türkiye.

出版信息

Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2024 Apr 3:1-11. doi: 10.1017/S096318012400015X.

DOI:10.1017/S096318012400015X
PMID:38567458
Abstract

Recent studies highlight the need for ethical and equitable digital health research that protects the rights and interests of racialized communities. We argue for practices in digital health that promote data self-determination for these communities, especially in data collection and management. We suggest that researchers partner with racialized communities to curate data that reflects their wellness understandings and health priorities, and respects their consent over data use for policy and other outcomes. These data governance approach honors and builds on Indigenous Data Sovereignty (IDS) decolonial scholarship by Indigenous and non-indigenous researchers and its adaptations to health research involving racialized communities from former European colonies in the global South. We discuss strategies to practice equity, diversity, inclusion, accessibility and decolonization (EDIAD) principles in digital health. We draw upon and adapt the concept of Precision Health Equity (PHE) to emphasize models of data sharing that are co-defined by racialized communities and researchers, and stress their shared governance and stewardship of data that is generated from digital health research. This paper contributes to an emerging research on equity issues in digital health and reducing health, institutional, and technological disparities. It also promotes the self-determination of racialized peoples through ethical data management.

摘要

近期研究凸显了开展符合伦理且公平的数字健康研究的必要性,此类研究旨在保护种族化社区的权益。我们主张在数字健康领域采取相关做法,以促进这些社区的数据自决权,尤其是在数据收集和管理方面。我们建议研究人员与种族化社区合作,精心整理能够反映其健康认知和健康优先事项的数据,并尊重他们对数据用于政策及其他成果的同意权。这种数据治理方法借鉴并基于本土和非本土研究人员的去殖民化研究成果——本土数据主权(IDS),以及其在涉及全球南方前欧洲殖民地种族化社区的健康研究中的应用。我们讨论了在数字健康领域践行公平、多样性、包容性、可及性和去殖民化(EDIAD)原则的策略。我们借鉴并调整了精准健康公平(PHE)的概念,以强调由种族化社区和研究人员共同定义的数据共享模式,并强调他们对数字健康研究产生的数据的共同治理和管理。本文为数字健康领域中关于公平问题以及减少健康、机构和技术差距的新兴研究做出了贡献。它还通过符合伦理的数据管理促进了种族化群体的自决权。

相似文献

1
Ethical and Equitable Digital Health Research: Ensuring Self-Determination in Data Governance for Racialized Communities.伦理与公平的数字健康研究:确保种族化社区数据治理中的自决权
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2024 Apr 3:1-11. doi: 10.1017/S096318012400015X.
2
Precision health equity for racialized communities.精准健康公平:面向少数族裔群体。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Dec 12;22(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-02049-4.
3
Indigenous Peoples and research: self-determination in research governance.原住民与研究:研究治理中的自决权
Front Res Metr Anal. 2023 Nov 15;8:1272318. doi: 10.3389/frma.2023.1272318. eCollection 2023.
4
Australia in 2030: what is our path to health for all?2030 年的澳大利亚:全民健康之路在何方?
Med J Aust. 2021 May;214 Suppl 8:S5-S40. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51020.
5
The Food Equity and Environmental Data Sovereignty (FEEDS) Project: Protocol for a Quasi-Experimental Study Evaluating a Digital Platform for Climate Change Preparedness.食品公平与环境数据主权(FEEDS)项目:一项评估气候变化应对数字平台的准实验研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Sep 15;10(9):e31389. doi: 10.2196/31389.
6
Identifying Challenges, Enabling Practices, and Reviewing Existing Policies Regarding Digital Equity and Digital Divide Toward Smart and Healthy Cities: Protocol for an Integrative Review.识别关于智能健康城市的数字公平与数字鸿沟的挑战、可行做法并审查现有政策:一项综合综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Dec 8;11(12):e40068. doi: 10.2196/40068.
7
Competing interests: digital health and indigenous data sovereignty.利益冲突:数字健康与原住民数据主权
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Jul 4;7(1):178. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01171-z.
8
Digital surveillance in a pandemic response: What bioethics ought to learn from Indigenous perspectives.大流行应对中的数字监控:生物伦理学应当从原住民视角中汲取的教训。
Bioethics. 2022 Mar;36(3):305-312. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13013. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
9
Indigenous data governance approaches applied in research using routinely collected health data: a scoping review.常规收集的健康数据在研究中的应用:一项范围综述。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Mar 15;7(1):68. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01070-3.
10
The SEEDS of Indigenous population health data linkage.原住民人口健康数据链接的基础。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2021 Jun 22;6(1):1417. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v6i1.1417.

引用本文的文献

1
A decade of research on genetic privacy: the findings of the GetPreCiSe Center at Vanderbilt University.十年基因隐私研究:范德堡大学精准隐私中心的研究成果
Front Genet. 2025 Aug 21;16:1629386. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2025.1629386. eCollection 2025.