Suppr超能文献

预防连续体中的性暴力:大学生中旁观者干预参与的差异。

Preventing Sexual Violence Within the Continuum: Differences in Bystander Intervention Engagement Among College Students.

机构信息

Miami University, Oxford, OH, USA.

California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, USA.

出版信息

J Interpers Violence. 2024 Dec;39(23-24):4772-4789. doi: 10.1177/08862605241243334. Epub 2024 Apr 3.

Abstract

Sexual violence is framed along a continuum that includes (but is not limited to) sexual harassment and sexual assault. While a few studies have evaluated students' predispositions and orientations around engaging in bystander intervention (BI) to prevent sexual assault, little has been done for preventing sexual harassment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate theory-based differences in college students' willingness to engage in BI for preventing either sexual assault or sexual harassment. Students were surveyed at two time points. At T1, intentions, attitudes, perceived norms, and perceived behavioral control (PBC) for BI to prevent sexual assault were evaluated, and the same variables were evaluated at T2 for sexual harassment. Independent -tests evaluated differences between groups. Linear regression analyses were used to evaluate determinants of intentions for BI for both groups. Students' attitudes toward BI/sexual assault were significantly higher than students' attitudes toward BI/sexual harassment ( = .019;  = .22). Conversely, students' PBC toward BI/sexual harassment was significantly higher than students' PBC for BI/sexual assault ( ≤.001;  = .49). Attitudes ( < .001) and PBC ( < .001) explained 45.9% of the variance of intentions for BI/sexual assault, while perceived norms ( < .001) and attitudes ( < .001) explained 28.4% of the variance of intentions for BI/sexual harassment. Sexual violence, encompassing both sexual assault and sexual harassment, is a pervasive issue on college campuses. More attention should be focused on preventing sexual harassment, as it can create a downstream effect. Furthermore, specific BI practices should be investigated to understand which are more effective at preventing sexual harassment and sexual assault.

摘要

性暴力是一个连续体,包括(但不限于)性骚扰和性侵犯。虽然有一些研究评估了学生在参与防止性侵犯的旁观者干预(BI)方面的倾向和取向,但在防止性骚扰方面做得还很少。本研究的目的是评估大学生在预防性侵犯或性骚扰方面进行 BI 的理论基础差异。学生在两个时间点接受调查。在 T1 时,评估了 BI 预防性侵犯的意图、态度、感知规范和感知行为控制(PBC),并在 T2 时评估了 BI 预防性骚扰的相同变量。独立检验评估了组间差异。线性回归分析用于评估两组 BI 意图的决定因素。学生对 BI/性侵犯的态度明显高于学生对 BI/性骚扰的态度( = .019; = .22)。相反,学生对 BI/性骚扰的 PBC 明显高于学生对 BI/性侵犯的 PBC( ≤.001; = .49)。态度( < .001)和 PBC( < .001)解释了 BI/性侵犯意图变化的 45.9%,而感知规范( < .001)和态度( < .001)解释了 BI/性骚扰意图变化的 28.4%。性暴力,包括性侵犯和性骚扰,是大学校园普遍存在的问题。应该更加关注预防性骚扰,因为它可能会产生下游效应。此外,应研究具体的 BI 实践,以了解哪些更能有效地预防性骚扰和性侵犯。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验