Suppr超能文献

朋友、陌生人及旁观者:性侵犯干预的非正式实践。

Friends, strangers, and bystanders: Informal practices of sexual assault intervention.

机构信息

a Department of Sociology , Columbia University , New York , NY , USA.

b Division of Gender, Sexuality and Health, Departments of Psychiatry and Sociomedical Sciences , New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University Medical Center , New York , NY , USA.

出版信息

Glob Public Health. 2019 Jan;14(1):53-64. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2018.1472290. Epub 2018 May 7.

Abstract

Sexual assault is a part of many students' experiences in higher education. In U.S. universities, one in four women and one in ten men report being sexually assaulted before graduation. Bystander training programmes have been shown to modestly reduce campus sexual assault. Like all public health interventions, however, they have unintended social consequences; this research examines how undergraduate men on one campus understand bystander interventions and how those understandings shape their actual practices. We draw on ethnographic data collected between August 2015 and January 2017 at Columbia University and Barnard College. Our findings show that university training and an earnest desire to be responsible lead many men to intervene in possible sexual assaults. However, students' gendered methods target more socially vulnerable and socially distant men while protecting popular men and those to whom they are socially connected. Students' actual bystander practices thus reproduce social hierarchies in which low prestige may or may not be connected to actual risks of sexual assault. These results suggest that understanding intragroup dynamics and social hierarchies is essential to assault prevention in universities and that students' actions as bystanders may be effective at preventing assaults in some circumstances but may lead to new risks of sexual assault.

摘要

性侵犯是许多大学生经历的一部分。在美国的大学里,四分之一的女性和十分之一的男性报告在毕业前遭受过性侵犯。旁观者培训计划已被证明可以适度减少校园性侵犯。然而,像所有公共卫生干预措施一样,它们也会产生意想不到的社会后果;这项研究考察了一个校园里的本科男生如何理解旁观者干预,以及这些理解如何塑造他们的实际行为。我们借鉴了 2015 年 8 月至 2017 年 1 月在哥伦比亚大学和巴纳德学院收集的民族志数据。我们的研究结果表明,大学培训和认真负责的愿望促使许多男性干预可能发生的性侵犯。然而,学生们有性别针对性的方法针对的是更弱势和更疏远的男性,而保护受欢迎的男性和与他们有社会联系的男性。因此,学生们的实际旁观者行为再现了社会等级制度,其中低威望可能与性侵犯的实际风险有关,也可能无关。这些结果表明,了解群体内部动态和社会等级制度对于大学中的性侵犯预防至关重要,而且学生作为旁观者的行为在某些情况下可能有效预防侵犯,但可能导致新的性侵犯风险。

相似文献

1
Friends, strangers, and bystanders: Informal practices of sexual assault intervention.
Glob Public Health. 2019 Jan;14(1):53-64. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2018.1472290. Epub 2018 May 7.
2
Control, Norms, and Attitudes: Differences Between Students Who Do and Do Not Intervene as Bystanders to Sexual Assault.
J Interpers Violence. 2018 Aug;33(15):2379-2401. doi: 10.1177/0886260515625503. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
3
"She Wasn't Resisting": Students' Barriers to Prosocial Intervention as Bystanders to Sexual Assault Risk Situations.
Violence Against Women. 2019 Mar;25(4):485-505. doi: 10.1177/1077801218790697. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
4
UK and Australian University Students' Perceptions of the Nature of Sexual Assault and Intervening Behavior.
J Interpers Violence. 2024 May;39(9-10):1952-1975. doi: 10.1177/08862605231212171. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
5
Preventing Sexual Violence Within the Continuum: Differences in Bystander Intervention Engagement Among College Students.
J Interpers Violence. 2024 Dec;39(23-24):4772-4789. doi: 10.1177/08862605241243334. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
7
Institutional commitment to combating sexual violence: The practices and policies of U.S. universities.
J Community Psychol. 2020 Nov;48(8):2692-2701. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22446. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
10
Students as Prosocial Bystanders to Sexual Assault: Demographic Correlates of Intervention Norms, Intentions, and Missed Opportunities.
J Interpers Violence. 2020 Feb;35(3-4):731-754. doi: 10.1177/0886260517689888. Epub 2017 Jan 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Embodied Injustice: Comparing Lesbian, Bisexual, and Queer and Heterosexual Women's Accounts of Unwanted Sex.
Soc Curr. 2024 Dec;11(6):515-531. doi: 10.1177/23294965241254071. Epub 2024 May 21.
2
Do Environmental Cues to Discovery Influence the Likelihood to Rape?
Evol Psychol. 2022 Oct-Dec;20(4):14747049221141078. doi: 10.1177/14747049221141078.
3
A Systematic Review Exploring Variables Related to Bystander Intervention in Sexual Violence Contexts.
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2023 Jul;24(3):1727-1742. doi: 10.1177/15248380221079660. Epub 2022 Mar 27.
4
Wine night, 'bro-dinners', and jungle juice: Disaggregating practices of undergraduate binge drinking.
J Drug Issues. 2019 Oct 1;49(4):643-667. doi: 10.1177/0022042619857549. Epub 2019 Jun 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Social Dimensions of Sexual Consent Among Cisgender Heterosexual College Students: Insights From Ethnographic Research.
J Adolesc Health. 2019 Jan;64(1):26-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
2
Sexual assault incidents among college undergraduates: Prevalence and factors associated with risk.
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 8;12(11):e0186471. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186471. eCollection 2017.
3
Sexual Aggression Victimization and Perpetration among Male and Female College Students in Chile.
Front Psychol. 2016 Sep 21;7:1354. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01354. eCollection 2016.
5
Breaking the Silence at Spanish Universities: Findings From the First Study of Violence Against Women on Campuses in Spain.
Violence Against Women. 2016 Nov;22(13):1519-1539. doi: 10.1177/1077801215627511. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
8
Trajectory Analysis of the Campus Serial Rapist Assumption.
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Dec;169(12):1148-54. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0707.
9
A Qualitative Exploration of Date Rape Survivors' Physical and Psycho-Social Experiences in a Nigerian University.
J Interpers Violence. 2017 Jan;32(2):227-248. doi: 10.1177/0886260515585541. Epub 2016 Jul 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验