• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

安全事故报告和障碍(SIRaB)研究:在医院环境中调查患者安全事件的策略和方法。

Safety incident reporting and barriers (SIRaB) study: Strategies and approaches for investigating patient safety events in a hospital set-up.

机构信息

Department of Clinical & Experimental Pharmacology, School of Tropical Medicine, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Independent Researcher, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

出版信息

J Eval Clin Pract. 2024 Jun;30(4):651-659. doi: 10.1111/jep.13990. Epub 2024 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1111/jep.13990
PMID:38567698
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Unsafe patient events not only entail a clinical impact but also lead to economic burden in terms of prolonged hospitalization or unintended harm and delay in care delivery. Monitoring and time-bound investigation of patient safety events (PSEs) is of paramount importance in a healthcare set-up.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the safety incident reporting behaviour and the barriers in a hospital set-up.

METHODS

The study had two sections: (a) Retrospective assessment of all safety incidents in the past 1 year, and (b) Understanding the barriers of safety reporting by interviewing the major stakeholders in patient safety reporting framework. Further root cause analysis and failure mode effect analysis were performed for the situation observed. Results were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the total of 106 PSEs reported voluntarily to the system, the highest reporting functional group was that of nurses (40.57%), followed by physicians (18.87%) and pharmacists (17.92%). Among the various factors identified as barriers in safety incident reporting, fear of litigation was the most observed component. The most commonly observed event was those pertaining to medication management, followed by diagnostic delay. Glitches in healthcare delivery accounted for 8.73% of the total reported PSEs, followed by 5.72% of events occurring due to inter-stakeholder communication errors. 4.22% of the PSEs were attributed to organizational managerial dysfunctionalities. Majority of medication-related PSE has moderate risk prioritization gradation.

CONCLUSION

Effective training and sensitization regarding the need to report the patient unsafe incidents or near misses to the healthcare system can help avert many untoward experiences. The notion of 'No Blame No Shame' should be well inculcated within the minds of each hospital unit such that even if an error occurs, its prompt reporting does not get harmed.

摘要

背景

不安全的患者事件不仅会产生临床影响,还会导致经济负担,例如住院时间延长、意外伤害以及护理延迟。在医疗保健环境中,监测和限时调查患者安全事件(PSE)至关重要。

目的

探索医院环境中的安全事件报告行为和障碍。

方法

该研究分为两个部分:(a)回顾过去 1 年中所有安全事件的报告,(b)通过访谈患者安全报告框架中的主要利益相关者,了解安全报告的障碍。对观察到的情况进一步进行根本原因分析和失效模式影响分析。对结果进行了统计分析。

结果

在自愿向系统报告的总共 106 起 PSE 中,报告功能组最高的是护士(40.57%),其次是医生(18.87%)和药剂师(17.92%)。在确定的安全事件报告障碍因素中,对诉讼的恐惧是最常见的因素。最常见的事件是与药物管理有关的事件,其次是诊断延迟。医疗保健服务提供中的差错占总报告 PSE 的 8.73%,其次是由于利益相关者之间沟通错误而发生的事件占 5.72%。4.22%的 PSE 归因于组织管理功能障碍。大多数与药物相关的 PSE 具有中度风险优先级。

结论

对向医疗保健系统报告患者不安全事件或险些发生的事件的必要性进行有效的培训和宣传,可以帮助避免许多不良事件的发生。“无责无过”的观念应在每个医院科室深入人心,即使发生错误,及时报告也不会受到损害。

相似文献

1
Safety incident reporting and barriers (SIRaB) study: Strategies and approaches for investigating patient safety events in a hospital set-up.安全事故报告和障碍(SIRaB)研究:在医院环境中调查患者安全事件的策略和方法。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2024 Jun;30(4):651-659. doi: 10.1111/jep.13990. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
2
Can Patient Safety Incident Reports Be Used to Compare Hospital Safety? Results from a Quantitative Analysis of the English National Reporting and Learning System Data.患者安全事件报告能否用于比较医院安全性?对英国国家报告与学习系统数据的定量分析结果
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 9;10(12):e0144107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144107. eCollection 2015.
3
Unit-based incident reporting and root cause analysis: variation at three hospital unit types.基于科室的事件报告与根本原因分析:三种医院科室类型的差异
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 21;6(6):e011277. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011277.
4
Practice, perceived barriers and motivating factors to medical-incident reporting: a cross-section survey of health care providers at Mbarara regional referral hospital, southwestern Uganda.实践、感知障碍和医疗事故报告的激励因素:乌干达西南部姆巴拉拉地区转诊医院医护人员的横断面调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 3;20(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05155-z.
5
Nature of Blame in Patient Safety Incident Reports: Mixed Methods Analysis of a National Database.患者安全事件报告中的归咎性质:对国家数据库的混合方法分析
Ann Fam Med. 2017 Sep;15(5):455-461. doi: 10.1370/afm.2123.
6
Patient safety incident reports related to traditional Japanese Kampo medicines: medication errors and adverse drug events in a university hospital for a ten-year period.与日本传统汉方药相关的患者安全事件报告:一所大学医院十年间的用药错误和药物不良事件
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2017 Dec 21;17(1):547. doi: 10.1186/s12906-017-2051-2.
7
Exploring the safety reporting culture among healthcare practitioners in Saudi hospitals: a comprehensive 2022 national study.探索沙特医院医疗保健从业者的安全报告文化:2022 年全国综合研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jun 28;24(1):769. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11160-3.
8
Rates and reasons for safety incident reporting in the medical imaging department of a large academic health sciences centre.大型学术健康科学中心医学影像部门安全事件报告率及原因。
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2021 Mar;52(1):86-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2020.11.018. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
9
Responding to adverse patient safety events in Viet Nam.应对越南不良患者安全事件。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Sep 18;19(1):677. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4518-y.
10
Differences between serious and nonserious patient safety incidents in the largest hospital district in Finland.芬兰最大医院区严重与非严重患者安全事件之间的差异。
J Healthc Risk Manag. 2018 Oct;38(2):27-35. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.21310. Epub 2018 Jan 10.