• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助部分肾切除术和根治性肾切除术的长期功能和肿瘤学结果:来自一家机构的报告,随访时间长达 15 年。

Long-Term Functional and Oncologic Outcomes Following Robotic Partial and Radical Nephrectomy: A Report from a Single Institution with up to 15 Years of Follow-Up.

机构信息

Glickman Urological & Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2024 Jun;38(6):573-583. doi: 10.1089/end.2023.0543.

DOI:10.1089/end.2023.0543
PMID:38568897
Abstract

To evaluate the long-term functional and oncologic outcomes after robotic partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and radical nephrectomy (RARN). A retrospective review was performed on 1816 patients who underwent RAPN and RARN at our institution between January 2006 and January 2018. Patients with long-term follow-ups of at least 5 years were selected. Exclusion criteria included patients with a previous history of partial or radical nephrectomy, known genetic mutations, and whose procedures were performed for benign indications. Statistical analysis was performed with results as presented. A total of 769 and 142 patients who underwent RAPN and RARN, respectively, met our inclusion criteria. The duration of follow-up was similar after the two procedures with a median of ∼100 months. The 5- and 10-year chronic kidney disease (CKD) upstaging-free survivals were 74.5% and 65.9% after RAPN and 53% and 46.4% after RARN, respectively. Older age was identified as a potential predictor for CKD progression after RARN, whereas older age, higher body mass index, baseline renal function, and ischemia time were shown to predict CKD progression after RAPN. Renal cell carcinoma-related mortality rates for RAPN and RARN were equally 1.1%. No statistically significant differences were identified in the local recurrence, metastatic, and disease-specific survival between the two procedures. Compared with RARN, RAPN conferred a better CKD progression-free survival. Several factors were identified as potential predictors for clinically significant CKD progression both in the early and late postoperative phase. Long-term oncologic outcomes between the two procedures remained similarly favorable.

摘要

评估机器人辅助部分肾切除术(RAPN)和根治性肾切除术(RARN)后的长期功能和肿瘤学结果。 对 2006 年 1 月至 2018 年 1 月期间在我院接受 RAPN 和 RARN 的 1816 例患者进行了回顾性分析。选择了至少随访 5 年的患者。排除标准包括既往接受过部分或根治性肾切除术、已知基因突变以及因良性指征而行手术的患者。结果以呈现的形式进行了统计学分析。 分别有 769 例和 142 例接受 RAPN 和 RARN 的患者符合我们的纳入标准。两种手术的随访时间相似,中位数约为 100 个月。RAPN 和 RARN 的 5 年和 10 年慢性肾脏病(CKD)升级无进展生存率分别为 74.5%和 65.9%和 53%和 46.4%。研究发现,RARN 后 CKD 进展的潜在预测因子是年龄较大,而 RAPN 后 CKD 进展的预测因子是年龄较大、较高的体重指数、基线肾功能和缺血时间。RAPN 和 RARN 的肾细胞癌相关死亡率均为 1.1%。两种手术在局部复发、转移和疾病特异性生存率方面无统计学差异。与 RARN 相比,RAPN 可获得更好的 CKD 无进展生存率。在术后早期和晚期,有几个因素被确定为 CKD 进展的潜在预测因子。两种手术的长期肿瘤学结果仍然相似。

相似文献

1
Long-Term Functional and Oncologic Outcomes Following Robotic Partial and Radical Nephrectomy: A Report from a Single Institution with up to 15 Years of Follow-Up.机器人辅助部分肾切除术和根治性肾切除术的长期功能和肿瘤学结果:来自一家机构的报告,随访时间长达 15 年。
J Endourol. 2024 Jun;38(6):573-583. doi: 10.1089/end.2023.0543.
2
Transperitoneal Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy with Minimum Follow-up of 5 Years: Oncological and Functional Outcomes from a Single Institution.经腹腔机器人辅助部分肾切除术:单中心 5 年以上随访的肿瘤学和功能结果。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2019 Mar;2(2):207-213. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.06.012. Epub 2018 Jul 14.
3
Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Totally Endophytic Renal Tumors: Step by Step Standardized Surgical Technique and Long-Term Outcomes with a Median 59-Month Follow-Up.机器人辅助部分肾切除术治疗完全内生性肾肿瘤:逐步标准化手术技术及中位随访59个月的长期结果
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Jan;29(1):1-11. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0124. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
4
Five-year Oncologic Outcomes After Transperitoneal Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma.经腹腔机器人辅助部分肾切除术治疗肾细胞癌的 5 年肿瘤学结果。
Eur Urol. 2016 Jun;69(6):1149-54. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.004. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
5
Time-Driven Activity-based Costing and Outcomes of Same-Day Discharge vs Inpatient Robotic Partial and Radical Nephrectomy.基于时间的作业成本法与日间出院和住院机器人部分及根治性肾切除术的结果比较。
Urology. 2024 Jun;188:11-17. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.03.034. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
6
Robotic Partial Radical Nephrectomy for Clinical T3a Tumors: A Narrative Review.机器人辅助部分肾切除术治疗临床 T3a 期肿瘤:叙述性综述。
J Endourol. 2023 Sep;37(9):978-985. doi: 10.1089/end.2023.0173. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
7
Percutaneous Microwave Ablation Versus Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Stage I Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study Focusing Upon Long-Term Follow-Up of Oncologic Outcomes.经皮微波消融与机器人辅助部分肾切除术治疗 I 期肾细胞癌:一项关注长期肿瘤学结果的倾向匹配队列研究。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024 May;47(5):573-582. doi: 10.1007/s00270-024-03695-z. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
8
Concordance between renal tumour biopsy and robotic-assisted partial and radical nephrectomy histology: a 10-year experience.肾肿瘤活检与机器人辅助部分和根治性肾切除术组织学的一致性:10 年经验。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jan 19;18(1):45. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01821-0.
9
Robotic versus open partial nephrectomy for highly complex renal masses: Comparison of perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes.机器人辅助与开放性部分肾切除术治疗高度复杂肾肿物:围手术期、功能及肿瘤学结局的比较
Urol Oncol. 2018 Oct;36(10):471.e1-471.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.06.012. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
10
Robotic partial nephrectomy vs minimally invasive radical nephrectomy for clinical T2a renal mass: a propensity score-matched comparison from the ROSULA (Robotic Surgery for Large Renal Mass) Collaborative Group.机器人辅助部分肾切除术与微创根治性肾切除术治疗临床 T2a 期肾肿瘤:来自 ROSULA(机器人治疗大肾肿瘤)协作组的倾向评分匹配比较。
BJU Int. 2020 Jul;126(1):114-123. doi: 10.1111/bju.15064. Epub 2020 Jun 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation of single-port robotic urologic surgery: experience at a large academic center.单孔机器人泌尿外科手术的实施:大型学术中心的经验。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Mar 16;18(1):119. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01884-z.