Suppr超能文献

经尿道前列腺切除术治疗良性前列腺增生后残余/复发性腺瘤的再次手术率:系统评价和比较随机研究的荟萃分析结果。

Reoperation Rate for Residual/Regrowth Adenoma Following Transurethral Interventions for Benign Prostatic Enlargement: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Randomized Studies.

机构信息

Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.

Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2024 Jun;38(6):605-628. doi: 10.1089/end.2023.0766. Epub 2024 Apr 22.

Abstract

To perform a systematic review to assess the incidence of reoperation rate for residual/regrowth adenoma after transurethral surgeries for benign prostatic enlargement. A systematic literature search was performed on November 12, 2023, using Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and Scopus. We only included randomized studies comparing monopolar (M)/bipolar (B) transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) ablation enucleation procedures. Incidence of reoperation was assessed using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Method and reported as risk ratio (RR), 95% confidence interval (CI), and -values. Statistical significance was set at  < 0.05. Forty-eight studies were included. Six studies compared enucleation TURP, 41 ablation TURP, and 1 study enucleation ablation TURP, encompassing 457 patients in enucleation, 2259 in ablation, and 2517 in the TURP group. The pooled incidence of reoperation was 6.2%, 0.7%, 2.3%, and 4.3% after ablation, enucleation, M-TURP, and B-TURP, respectively. Meta-analysis showed that the incidence of reoperation was significantly lower in the enucleation group (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.10-0.81,  = 0.02), but the difference accounted only in studies with follow-up between 1 and 3 years (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.04-0.85,  = 0.03). The incidence of reoperation was significantly lower in the enucleation compared with the B-TURP group (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03-0.77,  = 0.02). Meta-analysis showed that the incidence of reoperation was significantly higher in the ablation group (RR 1.81, 95% CI 1.33-2.47,  = 0.0002), but there was no difference in studies with follow-up up to 1 year (odds ratio 1.78 95% CI 0.97-3.29,  = 0.06) longer than 5 years (RR 2.02, 95% CI 0.71-5.79,  = 0.19). The incidence of reoperation was significantly higher in the ablation compared with the M-TURP group (RR 1.91, 95% CI 1.44-2.54,  < 0.0001). In mid-term follow-up, reoperation rate for residual/regrowth adenoma was significantly lower after enucleation, although was significantly higher after ablation compared with TURP.

摘要

为评估经尿道前列腺切除术治疗良性前列腺增生后残余/复发性腺瘤的再次手术率,我们进行了系统评价。2023 年 11 月 12 日,我们对 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、PubMed 和 Scopus 进行了系统文献检索。我们仅纳入了比较单极(M)/双极(B)经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)消融切除术与前列腺剜除术的随机研究。使用 Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel 方法评估再次手术的发生率,并报告风险比(RR)、95%置信区间(CI)和 -值。统计显著性设为 < 0.05。共纳入 48 项研究。其中 6 项研究比较了剜除术与 TURP、41 项消融术与 TURP、1 项剜除术与消融术与 TURP,共纳入 457 例剜除术、2259 例消融术和 2517 例 TURP 患者。剜除术、消融术、M-TURP 和 B-TURP 后再次手术的发生率分别为 6.2%、0.7%、2.3%和 4.3%。Meta 分析显示,剜除术组的再次手术发生率显著较低(RR 0.28,95%CI 0.10-0.81,= 0.02),但差异仅见于随访 1-3 年的研究中(RR 0.18,95%CI 0.04-0.85,= 0.03)。与 B-TURP 组相比,剜除术组的再次手术发生率显著较低(RR 0.14,95%CI 0.03-0.77,= 0.02)。Meta 分析显示,消融术组的再次手术发生率显著较高(RR 1.81,95%CI 1.33-2.47,= 0.0002),但在随访时间不超过 1 年的研究中(比值比 1.78,95%CI 0.97-3.29,= 0.06)与随访时间超过 5 年的研究中(RR 2.02,95%CI 0.71-5.79,= 0.19)之间没有差异。与 M-TURP 组相比,消融术组的再次手术发生率显著较高(RR 1.91,95%CI 1.44-2.54,< 0.0001)。在中期随访中,尽管与 TURP 相比,剜除术后残留/复发性腺瘤的再次手术率明显较低,但消融术后的再次手术率明显较高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验