Jing Zi-Bo, Wang Wen-Long, Nong Yu-Jia, Peng Lu, Yang Zi-Chen, Ye Bei, Lee Min-Yong, Wu Qian-Yuan
Key Laboratory of Microorganism Application and Risk Control of Shenzhen, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Research Center for Urban Water Recycling and Environmental Safety, Institute of Environment and Ecology, Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Key Laboratory of Microorganism Application and Risk Control of Shenzhen, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Research Center for Urban Water Recycling and Environmental Safety, Institute of Environment and Ecology, Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Water Res. 2024 May 15;255:121533. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2024.121533. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
Low-pressure mercury lamps emitting at 254 nm (UV254) are used widely for disinfection. However, subsequent exposure to visible light results in photoreactivation of treated bacteria. This study employed a krypton chloride excimer lamp emitting at 222 nm (UV222) to inactivate E. coli. UV222 and UV254 treatment had similar E. coli-inactivation kinetics. Upon subsequent irradiation with visible light, E. coli inactivated by UV254 was reactivated from 2.71-log to 4.75-log, whereas E. coli inactivated by UV222 showed negligible photoreactivation. UV222 treatment irreversibly broke DNA strands in the bacterium, whereas UV254 treatment primarily formed nucleobase dimers. Additionally, UV222 treatment caused cell membrane damage, resulting in wizened, pitted cells and permeability changes. The damage to the cell membrane was mainly due to the photolysis of proteins and lipids by UV222. Furthermore, the photolysis of proteins by UV222 destroyed enzymes, which blocked photoreactivation and dark repair. The multiple damages can be further evidenced by 4.0-61.1 times higher quantum yield in the photolysis of nucleobases and amino acids for UV222 than UV254. This study demonstrates that UV222 treatment damages multiple sites in bacteria, leading to their inactivation. Employing UV222 treatment as an alternative to UV254 could be viable for inhibiting microorganism photoreactivation in water and wastewater.
发射254纳米波长(UV254)的低压汞灯被广泛用于消毒。然而,后续暴露于可见光会导致被处理细菌的光复活。本研究采用发射222纳米波长(UV222)的氪氯准分子灯来灭活大肠杆菌。UV222和UV254处理具有相似的大肠杆菌灭活动力学。在随后用可见光照射时,被UV254灭活的大肠杆菌从2.71对数级复活至4.75对数级,而被UV222灭活的大肠杆菌显示出可忽略不计的光复活。UV222处理不可逆地破坏了细菌中的DNA链,而UV254处理主要形成核碱基二聚体。此外,UV222处理导致细胞膜损伤,产生皱缩、有凹坑的细胞以及通透性变化。细胞膜的损伤主要是由于UV222对蛋白质和脂质的光解作用。此外,UV222对蛋白质的光解作用破坏了酶,从而阻断了光复活和暗修复。UV222对核碱基和氨基酸的光解量子产率比UV254高4.0 - 61.1倍,这可以进一步证明多种损伤。本研究表明,UV222处理会破坏细菌中的多个位点,导致其失活。采用UV222处理替代UV254可能是抑制水和废水中微生物光复活的可行方法。